Mandela Institute for Development Studies
- Research works
- 31 ▲ 37% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 288 9.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 62% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Mandela Institute for Development Studies is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3.3×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.5×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Health Professions 1.5×
- Environmental Science 1.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.8×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
Which keywords describe research at Mandela Institute for Development Studies?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Global Trade, Depression, Corporate Political Activity, Non-Communicable Diseases, Human Rights, Anxiety, Psychological Impact and Mental Health.
- Quarantine
- Globalization
- Constitutionalism
- Consumer Protection
- COVID-19
- Psychological Impact
- Anxiety
- Human Rights
- Depression
- Global Trade
- Corporate Political Activity
- Non-Communicable Diseases
- Mental Health
- Primary Care
- Epidemiology
- Psychological Distress
- Developmental Local Government
- Pandemic
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 18 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 18 words, with their numbers
- Global Trade2▲ 53×2 topics
- Depression2▲ 9.2×7 topics
- Corporate Political Activity2▲ 223×1 topic
- Human Rights2▲ 7.5×6 topics
- Non-Communicable Diseases2▲ 45×1 topic
- Anxiety2▲ 15×4 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 4.8×4 topics
- Psychological Impact1▲ 22×3 topics
- Primary Care1▲ 10×5 topics
- COVID-191▲ 5.6×2 topics
- Epidemiology1◆ 0.95×8 topics
- Consumer Protection1▲ 71×2 topics
- Psychological Distress1▲ 26×2 topics
- Constitutionalism1▲ 28×1 topic
- Developmental Local Government1▲ 223×1 topic
- Globalization1▲ 1.79×3 topics
- Pandemic1▲ 7.1×1 topic
- Quarantine1▲ 55×1 topic
Which research topics does Mandela Institute for Development Studies publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Cultural and Artistic Studies, Microfinance and Financial Inclusion, Agricultural Innovations and Practices and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Cultural and Artistic Studies Cultural Studies 0 works
- 2 Microfinance and Financial Inclusion Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 3 Agricultural Innovations and Practices General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works
- 4 Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works
- 5 Student Assessment and Feedback Education 0 works
- 6 Legal Issues in South Africa Law 0 works
- 7 Academic integrity and plagiarism Safety Research 0 works
- 8 Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
- 9 Digital Mental Health Interventions Applied Psychology 0 works
- 10 Environmental law and policy Law 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Mandela Institute for Development Studies's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 37% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.