Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Mounds View · United States

Minnesota Institute of Public Health

miph.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
21
▼ 71% vs 2013–17
Citations
172
8.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
55%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Minnesota Institute of Public Health is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Which keywords describe research at Minnesota Institute of Public Health?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sudden Cardiac Death, Echocardiography, Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, Arrhythmias, Catheter Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 12 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 12 words, with their numbers
  1. Sudden Cardiac Death6▲ 218×2 topics
  2. Echocardiography5▲ 94×2 topics
  3. Heart Failure5▲ 57×2 topics
  4. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy5▲ 535×1 topic
  5. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator5▲ 535×1 topic
  6. Arrhythmias2▲ 67×2 topics
  7. Catheter Ablation2▲ 59×2 topics
  8. Radiofrequency Ablation2▲ 64×1 topic
  9. Ventricular Tachycardia2▲ 120×1 topic
  10. Education1▲ 5.0×3 topics
  11. Orthostatic Hypotension1▲ 205×1 topic
  12. Syncope1▲ 205×1 topic

Which research topics does Minnesota Institute of Public Health publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: ICT in Developing Communities, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods and Occupational Health and Performance.

ICT in Developing Commun…0ICT in Developing Communities: 0 fractional worksStatistical Methods in C…0Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials: 0 fractional worksBiosimilars and Bioanaly…0Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods: 0 fractional worksOccupational Health and …0Occupational Health and Performance: 0 fractional worksSleep and Work-Related F…0Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue: 0 fractional worksSafe Handling of Antineo…0Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs: 0 fractional worksWorkplace Health and Wel…0Workplace Health and Well-being: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsStatistics and ProbabilityImmunologyOccupational Therapy2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 ICT in Developing Communities Information Systems 0 works
  2. 2 Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistics and Probability 0 works
  3. 3 Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods Immunology 0 works
  4. 4 Occupational Health and Performance Occupational Therapy 0 works
  5. 5 Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs Occupational Therapy 0 works
  7. 7 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available55.2%not open44.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors20.6%domestic only79.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Minnesota Institute of Public Health's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 71% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.