Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Wellesley · United States

Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation

nlmfoundation.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
2
▼ 82% vs 2013–17
Citations
11
6.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
100.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
22%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Which research topics does Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments, Melanoma and MAPK Pathways and Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions.

  1. 1 Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms Molecular Biology 0 works
  2. 2 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments Hematology 0 works
  3. 3 Melanoma and MAPK Pathways Molecular Biology 0 works
  4. 4 Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions Oncology 0 works
  5. 5 Lung Cancer Research Studies Oncology 0 works
  6. 6 Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available21.6%not open78.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors21.6%domestic only78.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 82% lower than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Wellesley

All research institutions in Wellesley

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.