National Consortium for Zoonosis Research
- Research works
- 74 ▼ 86% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.5k 33.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 39% world 28%
Not ranked overall: National Consortium for Zoonosis Research is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at National Consortium for Zoonosis Research?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Antimicrobial Resistance, Vaccine Development, Infection, Public Health, Vaccine and Pathogenicity.
- Virulence
- Foot-and-Mouth Disease
- Population Dynamics
- Rabies
- Control
- Antibiotic Resistance
- Type III Secretion System
- Transmission
- Genetic Characterization
- Mycoplasma
- Diagnosis
- Campylobacter
- Norovirus
- Host-Pathogen Interactions
- Genomic Sequencing
- Climate Change
- Pathogenicity
- Public Health
- Vaccine Development
- Pathogenesis
- Epidemiology
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Infection
- Vaccine
- Virulence Factors
- Foodborne Illness
- Genomic Analysis
- Genetic Diversity
- Rotavirus
- Salmonella
- Immune Response
- Pasteurella
- Viral Pathogenesis
- Food Safety
- Virus
- Bats
- Equine Health
- Welfare Assessment
- African Swine Fever
- Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology21▲ 7.0×39 topics
- Pathogenesis11▲ 26×15 topics
- Antimicrobial Resistance8▲ 44×8 topics
- Vaccine Development7▲ 31×8 topics
- Infection7▲ 33×3 topics
- Public Health6▲ 6.5×8 topics
- Vaccine6▲ 20×8 topics
- Pathogenicity6▲ 84×4 topics
- Virulence Factors4▲ 31×5 topics
- Climate Change4▲ 2.0×10 topics
- Foodborne Illness4▲ 112×2 topics
- Genomic Sequencing4▲ 35×3 topics
- Genomic Analysis4▲ 17×7 topics
- Host-Pathogen Interactions4▲ 47×3 topics
- Genetic Diversity3▲ 9.3×6 topics
- Norovirus3▲ 80×1 topic
- Rotavirus3▲ 80×1 topic
- Campylobacter3▲ 160×1 topic
- Salmonella3▲ 160×1 topic
- Diagnosis3▲ 4.2×9 topics
- Immune Response3▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Mycoplasma3▲ 121×1 topic
- Pasteurella3▲ 121×1 topic
- Genetic Characterization3▲ 59×2 topics
- Viral Pathogenesis2▲ 43×2 topics
- Transmission2▲ 62×2 topics
- Food Safety2▲ 12×6 topics
- Type III Secretion System2▲ 40×2 topics
- Virus2▲ 24×2 topics
- Antibiotic Resistance2▲ 6.7×6 topics
- Bats2▲ 69×2 topics
- Control2▲ 20×1 topic
- Equine Health2▲ 145×1 topic
- Rabies2▲ 145×1 topic
- Welfare Assessment2▲ 145×1 topic
- Population Dynamics2▲ 8.2×4 topics
- African Swine Fever2▲ 73×1 topic
- Foot-and-Mouth Disease2▲ 73×1 topic
- Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers2▲ 49×1 topic
- Virulence2▲ 31×2 topics
Which research topics does National Consortium for Zoonosis Research publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Climate Change and Health Impacts, Energy and Environment Impacts and Air Quality and Health Impacts.
- 1 Climate Change and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
- 2 Energy and Environment Impacts Pollution 0 works
- 3 Air Quality and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has National Consortium for Zoonosis Research's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 86% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.