National Museum of Nature and Science
In research, National Museum of Nature and Science stands highest in Physical Sciences (#8,014 of 12,888 worldwide) and Life Sciences (#7,241 of 7,800 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Earth and Planetary Sciences and Ecology — Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics is 32.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #13,579 of 28,054 · #14,404 all time
- Rank in Japan
- #358 of 1,070
- Research works
- 1.2k ▲ 12% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 15k 13.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 47% world 28%
What is National Museum of Nature and Science known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,014 of 12,888 | 14.5% | 107 | #10318 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #7,241 of 7,800 | 10.4% | 93 | #10719 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Museum of Nature and Science sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does National Museum of Nature and Science specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics takes 32.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsSubfield · 32.6 works32×
- Earth and Planetary SciencesField · 49.1 works14×
- EcologySubfield · 21.6 works13×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 14.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 14.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5.3×
- Environmental Science 3.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.2×
- Veterinary 1.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Materials Science 0.8×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Dentistry 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Nursing 0.2×
- Energy 0.2×
- Psychology 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Social Sciences 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Health Professions 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at National Museum of Nature and Science?
Ranked on the composite score, Shigekazu Yoneda, Koichi Momma and Tsukasa Iwashina lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Museum of Nature and Science.
- 1 Shigekazu Yoneda Japan · #77,748 worldwide 428 citations · 35 works
- 2 Koichi Momma Japan · #180,786 worldwide 5.3k citations · 17 works
- 3 Tsukasa Iwashina Japan · #320,057 worldwide 98 citations · 32 works
- 4 Masanobu Higuchi Japan · #441,270 worldwide 45 citations · 19 works
- 5 Atsushi Ebihara Japan · #445,058 worldwide 51 citations · 23 works
- 6 Makoto Manabe Japan · #473,815 worldwide 81 citations · 23 works
- 7 Yasunari Shigeta Japan · #549,244 worldwide 110 citations · 29 works
- 8 Kentaro Hosaka Japan · #606,858 worldwide 90 citations · 25 works
- 9 Shoji Hamao Japan · #748,113 worldwide 33 citations · 17 works
- 10 Tsuyoshi Hosoya Japan · #768,693 worldwide 67 citations · 32 works
Which keywords describe research at National Museum of Nature and Science?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Biogeography, Climate Change, Biodiversity, Phylogenetic Analysis, Invasive Species, DNA Barcoding, Molecular Phylogeny and Phylogeny.
- Marine Ecosystems
- Paleoclimatology
- Glacial Cycles
- Plant-Animal Interactions
- Host Specificity
- Diversification
- Deep-Sea Ecology
- Zircon
- Ecosystem Services
- Thermodynamic Modeling
- Marine Biodiversity
- Morphology
- Global Change
- Evolution
- Ecosystem Functioning
- Taxonomy
- Phylogeny
- DNA Barcoding
- Phylogenetic Analysis
- Climate Change
- Biogeography
- Biodiversity
- Invasive Species
- Molecular Phylogeny
- Conservation
- Population Dynamics
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Plate Tectonics
- Tectonics
- Benthic Communities
- Ecology
- Holocene
- Geochronology
- Phylogenetic Relationships
- Estuarine Quality
- Sea Level
- Fisheries
- Pollinator Decline
- Mosses
- Phylogenetics
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Biogeography34▲ 61×19 topics
- Climate Change32▲ 5.5×32 topics
- Biodiversity22▲ 13×19 topics
- Phylogenetic Analysis21▲ 33×12 topics
- Invasive Species20▲ 22×17 topics
- DNA Barcoding20▲ 55×9 topics
- Molecular Phylogeny18▲ 53×11 topics
- Phylogeny16▲ 49×14 topics
- Conservation16▲ 17×14 topics
- Taxonomy15▲ 52×12 topics
- Population Dynamics14▲ 26×10 topics
- Ecosystem Functioning13▲ 31×6 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation12▲ 24×5 topics
- Evolution11▲ 21×13 topics
- Plate Tectonics10▲ 31×3 topics
- Global Change9▲ 16×4 topics
- Tectonics9▲ 35×3 topics
- Morphology9▲ 24×6 topics
- Benthic Communities9▲ 68×2 topics
- Marine Biodiversity9▲ 68×2 topics
- Ecology8▲ 25×9 topics
- Thermodynamic Modeling8▲ 32×2 topics
- Holocene7▲ 29×3 topics
- Ecosystem Services7▲ 8.8×4 topics
- Geochronology7▲ 49×1 topic
- Zircon7▲ 49×1 topic
- Phylogenetic Relationships7▲ 47×3 topics
- Deep-Sea Ecology7▲ 103×1 topic
- Estuarine Quality7▲ 103×1 topic
- Diversification7▲ 80×2 topics
- Sea Level7▲ 32×2 topics
- Host Specificity6▲ 27×3 topics
- Fisheries6▲ 72×2 topics
- Plant-Animal Interactions6▲ 33×1 topic
- Pollinator Decline6▲ 33×1 topic
- Glacial Cycles6▲ 41×1 topic
- Mosses6▲ 104×2 topics
- Paleoclimatology6▲ 33×1 topic
- Phylogenetics6▲ 62×3 topics
- Marine Ecosystems6▲ 50×2 topics
Which research topics does National Museum of Nature and Science publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Plant and animal studies and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Geological and Geochemical Analysis Geophysics 7 works
- 2 Marine Biology and Ecology Research Oceanography 7 works
- 3 Plant and animal studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 6 works
- 4 Geology and Paleoclimatology Research Atmospheric Science 6 works
- 5 Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils Paleontology 5 works
- 6 Plant Diversity and Evolution Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 5 works
- 7 Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions Molecular Biology 4 works
- 8 Lichen and fungal ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4 works
- 9 Ichthyology and Marine Biology Nature and Landscape Conservation 4 works
- 10 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 4 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has National Museum of Nature and Science's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Tokyo
- The University of Tokyo
- Tokyo Institute of Technology
- Keio University
- Waseda University
- Tokyo University of Science
- Nihon University
- Hitachi (Japan)
- NTT (Japan)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.