Most cited papers from Norfolk Archaeological Trust
What are the most cited papers from Norfolk Archaeological Trust?
The most cited paper from Norfolk Archaeological Trust is "Re-Use of Roman Stone in the Reedham Area of East Norfolk: Intimations of a Possible 'Lost' Roman Fort" (J. R. L. Allen, Edwin J. Rose, Michael G. Fulford, 2003), with 7 citations. Next come "Excavations at Quidney Farm, Saham Toney, Norfolk 1995" (4) and "REVIEWS" (0).
Showing 15 of 15 papers. Every paper is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Re-Use of Roman Stone in the Reedham Area of East Norfolk: Intimations of a Possible 'Lost' Roman Fort J. R. L. Allen, Edwin J. Rose, Michael G. Fulford · Britannia | 2003 | 7 |
| 2 | Excavations at Quidney Farm, Saham Toney, Norfolk 1995 Sarah E. Bates, Trevor Ashwin, John A. Davies et al. · Britannia | 2000 | 4 |
| 3 | REVIEWS Allan Straw et al. · Landscape History | 1992 | 0 |
| 4 | REVIEWS Allan Straw et al. · Landscape History | 1990 | 0 |
| 5 | REVIEWS Charles Watkins et al. · Landscape History | 2006 | 0 |
| 6 | REVIEWS A. E. Brown et al. · Landscape History | 2003 | 0 |
| 7 | REVIEWS Della Hooke et al. · Landscape History | 2002 | 0 |
| 8 | Recent Conferences Angret Simms, Bob Silvester, Della Hooke · Landscape History | 1988 | 0 |
| 9 | REVIEWS Ian D. Whyte et al. · Landscape History | 2008 | 0 |
| 10 | REVIEWS Frank McMinn Chambers et al. · Landscape History | 2000 | 0 |
| 11 | REVIEWS Gill Evans et al. · Landscape History | 1997 | 0 |
| 12 | SHORT NOTICES CATHERINE HILLS · The English Historical Review | 1978 | 0 |
| 13 | REVIEWS Allan Straw et al. · Landscape History | 1993 | 0 |
| 14 | REVIEWS Andrew J. Fleming et al. · Landscape History | 2011 | 0 |
| 15 | REVIEWS Allan Straw et al. · Landscape History | 1996 | 0 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.