Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Melbourne · ??

Science for All

Research works
17
▼ 57% vs 2013–17
Citations
31
1.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
42.2%
record average 16.5%
Open access
21%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Science for All is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Mathematics: 3.50× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 14.73× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.97× its world share, 0 worksMedicineDecision Sciences: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.86× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 2.36× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 14.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which research topics does Science for All publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Delphi Technique in Research, Health Policy Implementation Science, Mental Health and Patient Involvement and Frailty in Older Adults.

  1. 1 Delphi Technique in Research Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  2. 2 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 0 works
  4. 4 Frailty in Older Adults Geriatrics and Gerontology 0 works
  5. 5 COVID-19 epidemiological studies Modeling and Simulation 0 works
  6. 6 SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research Infectious Diseases 0 works
  7. 7 Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Health 0 works
  8. 8 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works
  9. 9 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  10. 10 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available20.8%not open79.2%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors17.4%domestic only82.6%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Science for All's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 57% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Melbourne

All research institutions in Melbourne

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.