Ethics in Clinical Research
Ethics in Clinical Research is a research topic within Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1950. 21.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the ethical considerations and challenges in medical research participation, including issues related to informed consent, clinical trials, minority recruitment, genomic research, human subjects protection, biobanking, and vulnerability in research. The papers also discuss strategies for improving recruitment and retention of diverse populations in research studies.
- Informed Consent
- Clinical Trials
- Research Participation
- Ethical Guidelines
- Minority Recruitment
- Genomic Research
- Human Subjects Protection
- Biobanking
- Vulnerability in Research
- Community Engagement
- Research works
- 25k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.4k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 21.8% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +28% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Ethics in Clinical Research research?
By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (2.2k and 515 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 2.2k works
- 2 United Kingdom 515 works
- 3 Canada 296 works
- 4 Australia 243 works
- 5 Germany 210 works
- 6 India 173 works
- 7 China 155 works
- 8 Netherlands 130 works
- 9 France 121 works
- 10 Italy 114 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Ethics in Clinical Research research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Ethics in Clinical Research research, followed by Harvard University and University of Pennsylvania.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 65 works
- 2 Harvard UniversityUnited States 35 works
- 3 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 33 works
- 4 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 27 works
- 5 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 27 works
- 6 University of California, San FranciscoUnited States 26 works
- 7 Stanford UniversityUnited States 25 works
- 8 University of WashingtonUnited States 24 works
- 9 University of MichiganUnited States 24 works
- 10 New York UniversityUnited States 21 works
Who are the leading researchers in Ethics in Clinical Research?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Ethics in Clinical Research include David Moher, Douglas G. Altman and Isabelle Boutron.
- 1 David Moher Canada 38k citations
- 2 Douglas G. Altman United Kingdom 23k citations
- 3 Isabelle Boutron France 14k citations
- 4 Asbjørn Hróbjartsson Denmark 13k citations
- 5 John P. A. Ioannidis United States 8k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Ethics in Clinical Research research done?
The largest centres of Ethics in Clinical Research research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), New York (United States), Boston (United States) and Melbourne (Australia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bethesda, Chapel Hill and San Francisco.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 London United Kingdom 150 works
- 2 New York United States 123 works
- 3 Boston United States 96 works
- 4 Melbourne Australia 70 works
- 5 Chapel Hill United States 68 works
- 6 Philadelphia United States 66 works
- 7 Washington D.C. United States 61 works
- 8 Toronto Canada 59 works
- 9 Baltimore United States 55 works
- 10 Cambridge United States 53 works
Where it is the local speciality
- BethesdaUS · 50.4 works7.7×
- Chapel HillUS · 68.2 works7.2×
- San FranciscoUS · 48.4 works7.0×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Ethics in Clinical Research than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Ethics in Clinical Research?
Among universities, judged by research, University of Aberdeen, University of Oxford and Harvard University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of AberdeenUnited Kingdom | 67.8 | 35.1% | 10.0× | 11 | +47.5% |
| 2 | University of OxfordUnited Kingdom | 62.0 | 37.5% | 4.1× | 28 | +50.2% |
| 3 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 58.2 | 27.8% | 5.3× | 35 | +64.7% |
| 4 | University of California, San FranciscoUnited States | 53.3 | 21.9% | 7.7× | 26 | +60.8% |
| 5 | The University of MelbourneAustralia | 53.0 | 29.2% | 4.0× | 20 | +114.3% |
| 6 | Makerere UniversityUganda | 52.4 | 24.7% | 9.1× | 9 | +33.8% |
| 7 | University of California, IrvineUnited States | 51.4 | 23.4% | 5.4× | 16 | +231.8% |
| 8 | Stanford UniversityUnited States | 50.5 | 29.8% | 3.9× | 25 | +64.1% |
| 9 | The University of SydneyAustralia | 50.3 | 34.8% | 3.3× | 17 | +31.6% |
| 10 | KU LeuvenBelgium | 49.7 | 37.6% | 2.4× | 11 | +54.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Ethics in Clinical Research research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 28% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Ethics in Clinical Research.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.