SciTech Strategies (United States)
- Research works
- 104 ▼ 4% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 5.9k 56.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 41% world 28%
Not ranked overall: SciTech Strategies (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 6.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 6.3×
- Chemical Engineering 5.4×
- Arts and Humanities 5.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.2×
- Mathematics 2.1×
- Environmental Science 1.9×
- Chemistry 1.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.3×
- Neuroscience 1.2×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Engineering 0.7×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at SciTech Strategies (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans lead among researchers whose main affiliation is SciTech Strategies (United States).
- 1 Kevin W. Boyack United States · #109,988 worldwide 271 citations · 30 works
- 2 Richard Klavans United States · #302,312 worldwide 206 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at SciTech Strategies (United States)?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Interdisciplinary Research, Bibliometric Analysis, Research Evaluation, Risk Assessment, Knowledge Management, Big Data, Semantic Web and Natural Language Processing.
- Automatic
- Game Theory
- Neurotoxicity
- Business Intelligence
- Open Access
- Chronic Diseases
- Content Analysis
- Data Science
- Community Structure
- Food Safety
- Ensemble Kalman Filter
- Pesticides
- Scholarly Communication
- Health Effects
- Peer Review
- Natural Language Processing
- Big Data
- Sustainability
- Risk Assessment
- Interdisciplinary Research
- Bibliometric Analysis
- Research Evaluation
- Environmental Impact
- Knowledge Management
- Semantic Web
- Data Integration
- Biomedical Ontologies
- Text Mining
- Optimization
- Data Assimilation
- Evolutionary Synthesis
- Mechanistic Explanation
- Network Dynamics
- Firm Performance
- Supply Chain Management
- Information Retrieval
- Analytics
- Exposure
- Scientific Communication
- Research Dissemination
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Bibliometric Analysis12▲ 264×1 topic
- Interdisciplinary Research12▲ 152×2 topics
- Research Evaluation12▲ 565×1 topic
- Risk Assessment6▲ 9.9×6 topics
- Environmental Impact5▲ 3.6×9 topics
- Sustainability5▲ 2.7×9 topics
- Knowledge Management4▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Big Data4▲ 7.5×4 topics
- Semantic Web4▲ 27×3 topics
- Natural Language Processing4▲ 28×2 topics
- Data Integration4▲ 14×2 topics
- Peer Review3▲ 100×3 topics
- Biomedical Ontologies3▲ 113×1 topic
- Health Effects3▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Text Mining3▲ 35×1 topic
- Scholarly Communication3▲ 112×2 topics
- Optimization3▲ 5.2×2 topics
- Pesticides3▲ 28×3 topics
- Data Assimilation3▲ 14×1 topic
- Ensemble Kalman Filter3▲ 23×1 topic
- Evolutionary Synthesis3▲ 96×1 topic
- Food Safety3▲ 9.8×2 topics
- Mechanistic Explanation3▲ 96×1 topic
- Community Structure3▲ 31×1 topic
- Network Dynamics3▲ 22×1 topic
- Data Science3▲ 36×2 topics
- Firm Performance3▲ 16×2 topics
- Content Analysis2▲ 24×3 topics
- Supply Chain Management2▲ 4.5×2 topics
- Chronic Diseases2▲ 7.9×2 topics
- Information Retrieval2▲ 15×4 topics
- Open Access2▲ 26×3 topics
- Analytics2▲ 41×1 topic
- Business Intelligence2▲ 41×1 topic
- Exposure2▲ 32×1 topic
- Neurotoxicity2▲ 12×1 topic
- Scientific Communication2▲ 75×2 topics
- Game Theory2▲ 13×3 topics
- Research Dissemination2▲ 102×2 topics
- Automatic2▲ 55×1 topic
Which research topics does SciTech Strategies (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Philosophy and History of Science, Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies and scientometrics and bibliometrics research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Philosophy and History of Science History and Philosophy of Science 2 works
- 2 Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers Building and Construction 1 works
- 3 Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies Molecular Biology 1 works
- 4 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1 works
- 5 Environmental Chemistry and Analysis Environmental Chemistry 0 works
- 6 Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity Plant Science 0 works
- 7 Antimicrobial agents and applications Organic Chemistry 0 works
- 8 Student Assessment and Feedback Education 0 works
- 9 Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy 0 works
- 10 Ecosystem dynamics and resilience Global and Planetary Change 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has SciTech Strategies (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 4% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Berwyn
- TE Connectivity (United States)
- Ametek (United States)
- Triumph Group (United States)
- QR Pharma (United States)
- VitalStrategic Research Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.