Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Twitter (United States)

Research works
3.5k
▲ 675% vs 2013–17
Citations
25k
7.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
21.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
32%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Twitter (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

What does Twitter (United States) specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Museology takes 15.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. MuseologySubfield · 61.2 works16×
  2. Visual Arts and Performing ArtsSubfield · 70.1 works12×
  3. CommunicationSubfield · 59.3 works7.8×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.33× its world share, 30 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.17× its world share, 15 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.10× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.57× its world share, 16 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.19× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 0.08× its world share, 1 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.09× its world share, 4 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.73× its world share, 141 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.26× its world share, 12 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.16× its world share, 3 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.31× its world share, 125 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.28× its world share, 31 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.05× its world share, 5 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.61× its world share, 23 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.23× its world share, 17 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.27× its world share, 2 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.66× its world share, 97 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.48× its world share, 159 worksMedicineNursing: 0.17× its world share, 1 worksNursingVeterinary: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 3.78× its world share, 402 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.53× its world share, 41 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.88× its world share, 24 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.36× its world share, 90 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.83× its world share, 187 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.76× its world share, 917 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 3.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Twitter (United States)?

Ranked on the composite score, Rubén González Cuerva, Peter van Steen and Jouko Lindstedt lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Twitter (United States).

  1. 1 Rubén González Cuerva United States · #339,812 worldwide 2 citations · 32 works
  2. 2 Peter van Steen United States · #478,006 worldwide 25 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Jouko Lindstedt United States · #565,899 worldwide 16 citations · 20 works
  4. 4 Andreas Marti United States · #569,732 worldwide 0 citations · 19 works
  5. 5 Renato Cymbalista United States · #656,373 worldwide 8 citations · 16 works
  6. 6 Reindert Dhondt United States · #712,387 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
  7. 7 Cheolsoo Kim United States · #732,590 worldwide 15 citations · 16 works
  8. 8 Wessie Ling United States · #806,048 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
  9. 9 Iva Rosanda Žigo United States · #877,560 worldwide 0 citations · 21 works
  10. 10 Nehginpao Kipgen United States · #898,352 worldwide 6 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Twitter (United States)

Which research topics does Twitter (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Fashion and Cultural Textiles, Media Studies and Communication, Innovations in Medical Education and Social Media and Politics.

  1. 1 Fashion and Cultural Textiles Museology 22 works
  2. 2 Media Studies and Communication Communication 19 works
  3. 3 Innovations in Medical Education Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 18 works
  4. 4 Social Media and Politics Communication 18 works
  5. 5 Crafts, Textile, and Design Museology 16 works
  6. 6 Intelligence, Security, War Strategy Political Science and International Relations 15 works
  7. 7 Cinema and Media Studies Economics and Econometrics 15 works
  8. 8 Art Education and Development Visual Arts and Performing Arts 15 works
  9. 9 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 14 works
  10. 10 Suicide and Self-Harm Studies Clinical Psychology 14 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available32.3%not open67.7%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors18.9%domestic only81.1%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Twitter (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 675% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in San Francisco

All research institutions in San Francisco

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.