United States Army Medical Command
In research, United States Army Medical Command stands highest in Health Sciences (#5,021 of 20,462 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#6,480 of 21,541 worldwide) and Engineering (#5,121 of 11,412 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #19,594 of 28,054 · #8,472 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,853 of 4,192
- Research works
- 1.6k ▼ 30% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 22k 14.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 19% world 28%
What is United States Army Medical Command known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #5,021 of 20,462 | 17.2% | 578 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #6,480 of 21,541 | 15.2% | 568 | |
| EngineeringField | #5,121 of 11,412 | 15.6% | 317 | |
| MedicineField | #8,429 of 17,978 | 18.2% | 391 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #2,232 of 3,776 | 15.0% | 156 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #10,520 of 16,945 | 15.0% | 265 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #9,997 of 14,347 | 13.7% | 149 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where United States Army Medical Command sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 5.2×
- Psychology 3.0×
- Medicine 2.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.0×
- Decision Sciences 2.0×
- Veterinary 1.8×
- Nursing 1.4×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Dentistry 0.9×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at United States Army Medical Command?
Ranked on the composite score, G. Hass, Glenn R. Hawkes and Terry A. Klein lead among researchers whose main affiliation is United States Army Medical Command.
- 1 G. Hass United States · #132,803 worldwide 232 citations · 23 works
- 2 Glenn R. Hawkes United States · #296,526 worldwide 61 citations · 27 works
- 3 Terry A. Klein United States · #306,472 worldwide 109 citations · 48 works
- 4 John D. Grabenstein United States · #445,792 worldwide 30 citations · 29 works
- 5 F Rath United States · #537,266 worldwide 8 citations · 30 works
- 6 J.I. Bruce United States · #625,724 worldwide 36 citations · 21 works
- 7 John S. Billings United States · #650,922 worldwide 8 citations · 24 works
- 8 Davies Am United States · #654,178 worldwide 44 citations · 21 works
- 9 Bonnie Mowinski Jennings United States · #773,942 worldwide 26 citations · 23 works
- 10 C.J. Babcock United States · #790,610 worldwide 17 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at United States Army Medical Command?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Public Health, Trauma, Resuscitation, Mental Health, Physical Fitness, Hemorrhage and Cancer Risk.
- Measurement Properties
- Psychological Factors
- Trauma Center
- Blood Transfusion
- Quality Improvement
- Psychological Treatment
- Pathogenesis
- Cognitive Therapy
- Psychometric Evaluation
- Risk Factors
- Infectious Diseases
- Albumin
- Coagulopathy
- Healthcare Workers
- Ethical Considerations
- Firefighters
- Cancer Risk
- Physical Fitness
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Trauma
- Resuscitation
- Hemorrhage
- Emergency Responders
- Disaster Response
- Resilience
- Sepsis
- Mortality
- Glycocalyx
- Resource Allocation
- Emergency Preparedness
- Triage
- Health Outcomes
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
- Global Burden
- Transportation
- Injury Severity
- Critical Care
- Disability
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology14▲ 3.7×51 topics
- Public Health9▲ 6.2×24 topics
- Trauma7▲ 34×4 topics
- Mental Health6▲ 4.2×14 topics
- Resuscitation5▲ 39×4 topics
- Physical Fitness4▲ 33×2 topics
- Hemorrhage4▲ 67×3 topics
- Cancer Risk4▲ 19×2 topics
- Emergency Responders4▲ 240×1 topic
- Firefighters4▲ 240×1 topic
- Disaster Response4▲ 53×2 topics
- Ethical Considerations4▲ 11×4 topics
- Resilience4▲ 7.6×8 topics
- Healthcare Workers4▲ 14×2 topics
- Sepsis4▲ 21×3 topics
- Coagulopathy3▲ 44×2 topics
- Mortality3▲ 5.9×9 topics
- Albumin3▲ 137×1 topic
- Glycocalyx3▲ 137×1 topic
- Infectious Diseases3▲ 10.0×4 topics
- Resource Allocation3▲ 18×2 topics
- Risk Factors3▲ 2.8×13 topics
- Emergency Preparedness3▲ 74×1 topic
- Psychometric Evaluation3▲ 33×2 topics
- Triage3▲ 74×1 topic
- Cognitive Therapy3▲ 26×2 topics
- Health Outcomes3▲ 9.9×3 topics
- Pathogenesis3▲ 5.3×8 topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder2▲ 94×1 topic
- Psychological Treatment2▲ 94×1 topic
- Global Burden2▲ 4.6×7 topics
- Quality Improvement2▲ 13×2 topics
- Transportation2▲ 13×2 topics
- Blood Transfusion2▲ 50×3 topics
- Injury Severity2▲ 26×1 topic
- Trauma Center2▲ 52×1 topic
- Critical Care2▲ 7.5×6 topics
- Psychological Factors2▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Disability1▲ 13×1 topic
- Measurement Properties1▲ 18×1 topic
Which research topics does United States Army Medical Command publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Occupational Health and Performance, Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation, Disaster Response and Management and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Occupational Health and Performance Occupational Therapy 4 works
- 2 Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 3 works
- 3 Disaster Response and Management Emergency Medical Services 3 works
- 4 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research Clinical Psychology 2 works
- 5 Trauma and Emergency Care Studies Emergency Medicine 2 works
- 6 Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Emergency Medicine 1 works
- 7 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 1 works
- 8 Blood transfusion and management Biochemistry 1 works
- 9 Traumatic Brain Injury Research Epidemiology 1 works
- 10 Blood donation and transfusion practices Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has United States Army Medical Command's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 30% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in San Antonio
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center
- The University of Texas at San Antonio
- Southwest Research Institute
- Trinity University
- San Antonio College
- Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Joint Base San Antonio
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.