Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation is a research topic within Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the management of fluid resuscitation, coagulopathy, and hemorrhage in trauma and critical care settings. It covers topics such as the use of albumin and crystalloids, thromboelastography, glycocalyx damage, and the impact of different resuscitation strategies on patient outcomes, particularly in cases of massive transfusion and sepsis.

  • Trauma
  • Coagulopathy
  • Resuscitation
  • Glycocalyx
  • Hemorrhage
  • Albumin
  • Crystalloids
  • Thromboelastography
  • Massive Transfusion
  • Sepsis
Research works
29k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+9%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
43% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.9k and 809 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 1.9k works
  2. 2 China 809 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 309 works
  4. 4 India 288 works
  5. 5 Japan 259 works
  6. 6 Germany 234 works
  7. 7 France 209 works
  8. 8 Canada 169 works
  9. 9 Australia 163 works
  10. 10 Italy 147 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 42.8%China: 17.9%United Kingdom: 6.8%India: 6.4%6 others listed: 26.1%43%largest
United States1,938 · 42.8%China809 · 17.9%United Kingdom309 · 6.8%India288 · 6.4%6 others listed1,181 · 26.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research?

By volume in 2022-now, United States Department of Defense publishes the most Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research, followed by Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Harvard University.

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States Department of DefenseUnited States 84 works
  2. 2 Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesUnited States 59 works
  3. 3 Harvard UniversityUnited States 58 works
  4. 4 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 38 works
  5. 5 Sichuan UniversityChina 36 works
  6. 6 University of TorontoCanada 34 works
  7. 7 Capital Medical UniversityChina 29 works
  8. 8 Mayo ClinicUnited States 28 works
  9. 9 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 27 works
  10. 10 Karolinska InstitutetSweden 27 works

Who are the leading researchers in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation include Valery L. Feigin, Giuseppe Remuzzi and Gordon Henry Guyatt.

  1. 1 Valery L. Feigin New Zealand 341k citations
  2. 2 Giuseppe Remuzzi Italy 328k citations
  3. 3 Gordon Henry Guyatt Canada 315k citations
  4. 4 Gregory Y.H. Lip United Kingdom 311k citations
  5. 5 Peter Jüni Switzerland 303k citations
  6. 6 Peter Christian Gøtzsche Denmark 292k citations
  7. 7 Jeremy Grimshaw Canada 281k citations
  8. 8 Stuart Pocock United Kingdom 273k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation?

The most cited paper in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation is "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses" (Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks et al., 2003), with 64,184 citations. Next come "Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock" (10,842) and "KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury" (8,233).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks et al. · BMJ Open access 4 Sep 2003 64,184
2 Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Emanuel P. Rivers, Bryant Nguyen, Suzanne L Havstad et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 8 Nov 2001 10,842
3 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury Arif Khwaja · Nephron Clinical Practice 7 Aug 2012 8,233
4 Intravenous Fluids and Acute Kidney Injury Xiaoqiang Ding, Zhen Cheng, Qi Qian · Blood Purification Open access 2017 6,843
5 Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia Ning Tang, Dengju Li, Xiong Wang et al. · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Open access 19 Feb 2020 5,896
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research done?

The largest centres of Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), San Antonio (United States) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in San Antonio and Aurora.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 127 works
  2. 2 LondonUnited Kingdom 103 works
  3. 3 San AntonioUnited States 73 works
  4. 4 ParisFrance 70 works
  5. 5 New YorkUnited States 64 works
  6. 6 BostonUnited States 60 works
  7. 7 TokyoJapan 60 works
  8. 8 BethesdaUnited States 60 works
  9. 9 PittsburghUnited States 56 works
  10. 10 SeoulSouth Korea 55 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. San AntonioUS · 72.6 works17×
  2. AuroraUS · 22.9 works8.8×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation than the world average.

See Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation on the map

Where is the best place to study Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation?

Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, Karolinska Institutet and Sichuan University score highest, combining citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 17.2%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Queen Mary Universit…Karolinska InstitutetSichuan UniversityHarvard University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Citation excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Harvard UniversityUnited States 72.712.1%3.2×58 +7.5%
2Karolinska InstitutetSweden 71.016.8%8.4×27 +43.7%
3Sichuan UniversityChina 64.916.5%2.8×36 +36.0%
4Queen Mary University of LondonUnited Kingdom 64.923.4%5.2×13 -5.8%
5University of Alabama at BirminghamUnited States 62.215.3%8.4×23 +40.3%
6Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesUnited States 61.810.1%53.2×59 -9.5%
7Humanitas UniversityItaly 60.819.3%10.3×8 +77.7%
8University of PittsburghUnited States 59.818.9%5.9×27 -11.3%
9Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 59.317.3%3.1×27 -8.9%
10Sorbonne UniversitéFrance 59.222.3%2.7×11 +122.4%

Universities only. The score blends citation excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation, country by country

Is Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 9% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.023% in 2024.

still counting0.020%0.040%Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation0.029% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation9.9% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.