Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation is a research topic within Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 18.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the management of fluid resuscitation, coagulopathy, and hemorrhage in trauma and critical care settings. It covers topics such as the use of albumin and crystalloids, thromboelastography, glycocalyx damage, and the impact of different resuscitation strategies on patient outcomes, particularly in cases of massive transfusion and sepsis.
- Trauma
- Coagulopathy
- Resuscitation
- Glycocalyx
- Hemorrhage
- Albumin
- Crystalloids
- Thromboelastography
- Massive Transfusion
- Sepsis
- Research works
- 29k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.3k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 18.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +14% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.6k and 626 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.6k works
- 2 China 626 works
- 3 United Kingdom 253 works
- 4 India 221 works
- 5 Japan 209 works
- 6 Germany 187 works
- 7 France 171 works
- 8 Canada 145 works
- 9 Australia 142 works
- 10 Italy 115 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences publishes the most Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research, followed by University of Pittsburgh and United States Army Institute of Surgical Research.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesUnited States 31 works
- 2 University of PittsburghUnited States 22 works
- 3 United States Army Institute of Surgical ResearchUnited States 19 works
- 4 University of Alabama at BirminghamUnited States 18 works
- 5 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 18 works
- 6 University of Colorado DenverUnited States 17 works
- 7 Karolinska InstitutetSweden 17 works
- 8 University of Maryland, BaltimoreUnited States 16 works
- 9 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 16 works
- 10 Sichuan UniversityChina 15 works
Who are the leading researchers in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation include P.J. Devereaux.
- 1 P.J. Devereaux Canada 4.8k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research done?
The largest centres of Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), San Antonio (United States) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in San Antonio and Denver.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Beijing China 107 works
- 2 London United Kingdom 83 works
- 3 San Antonio United States 60 works
- 4 Paris France 58 works
- 5 New York United States 55 works
- 6 Bethesda United States 50 works
- 7 Boston United States 50 works
- 8 Seoul South Korea 47 works
- 9 Tokyo Japan 47 works
- 10 Pittsburgh United States 46 works
Where it is the local speciality
- San AntonioUS · 60.4 works18×
- DenverUS · 29.1 works8.8×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation?
Among universities, judged by research, Karolinska Institutet, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and University of Colorado Denver score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karolinska InstitutetSweden | 74.0 | 36.2% | 7.7× | 17 | +29.1% |
| 2 | Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesUnited States | 70.4 | 21.5% | 68.0× | 31 | +65.5% |
| 3 | University of Colorado DenverUnited States | 56.9 | 18.1% | 10.8× | 17 | +25.5% |
| 4 | University of Maryland, BaltimoreUnited States | 56.1 | 14.0% | 9.9× | 16 | +95.4% |
| 5 | The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonUnited States | 55.3 | 25.6% | 8.6× | 13 | +31.3% |
| 6 | University of PittsburghUnited States | 54.4 | 24.4% | 5.9× | 22 | +15.2% |
| 7 | University of Alabama at BirminghamUnited States | 54.3 | 22.4% | 7.7× | 18 | +26.2% |
| 8 | Queen Mary University of LondonUnited Kingdom | 50.5 | 36.0% | 4.5× | 9 | -4.1% |
| 9 | University of ArizonaUnited States | 44.7 | 25.0% | 4.5× | 14 | +22.4% |
| 10 | University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusUnited States | 43.2 | 13.2% | 7.9× | 11 | +99.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 14% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.