Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
In research, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná stands highest in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#559 of 3,409 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#2,339 of 12,888 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#2,412 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Forestry, Information Systems and Management and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — Forestry is 15.2× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #3,035 of 28,054 · #4,149 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #28 of 714
- Research works
- 22k ▲ 44% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 129k 5.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 56% world 28%
What is Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #559 of 3,409 | 10.0% | 504 | #459 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #2,339 of 12,888 | 7.6% | 2,528 | #3422 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #2,412 of 11,982 | 10.4% | 368 | #3797 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #2,167 of 10,521 | 7.4% | 1,732 | #3147 | |
| EngineeringField | #1,399 of 6,636 | 8.1% | 1,014 | #1987 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #567 of 1,928 | 10.2% | 99 | #741 | |
| MedicineField | #3,377 of 10,443 | 10.8% | 232 | #7524 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #1,240 of 3,551 | 5.7% | 580 | #1445 | |
| Social SciencesField | #2,323 of 6,365 | 5.6% | 1,066 | #3420 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #1,757 of 4,667 | 8.3% | 490 | #1570 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#459 #559
- Physical Sciences#3,422 #2,339
- Health Sciences#3,797 #2,412
- Social Sciences#3,147 #2,167
- Engineering#1,987 #1,399
- Health Professions#741 #567
- Medicine#7,524 #3,377
- Environmental Science#1,445 #1,240
- Social Sciences#3,420 #2,323
- Computer Science#1,570 #1,757
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Forestry takes 15.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- ForestrySubfield · 84.0 works15×
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 134.0 works8.9×
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 238.2 works7.7×
- Urban StudiesSubfield · 55.8 works3.8×
- Analytical ChemistrySubfield · 38.0 works3.7×
- Decision SciencesField · 188.0 works3.7×
- Building and ConstructionSubfield · 100.2 works3.0×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 3.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 3.7×
- Environmental Science 2.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.0×
- Social Sciences 1.6×
- Engineering 1.3×
- Computer Science 1.2×
- Arts and Humanities 1.2×
- Chemistry 1.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.0×
- Chemical Engineering 0.9×
- Energy 0.9×
- Mathematics 0.9×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Materials Science 0.8×
- Veterinary 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná?
Ranked on the composite score, Jo�ão Luiz Kovaleski, Regina Pagani and Luis Maurício Martins de Resende lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná.
- 1 Jo�ão Luiz Kovaleski Brazil · #81,409 worldwide 116 citations · 59 works
- 2 Regina Pagani Brazil · #169,280 worldwide 101 citations · 26 works
- 3 Luis Maurício Martins de Resende Brazil · #213,708 worldwide 82 citations · 32 works
- 4 Sani de Carvalho Rutz da Silva Brazil · #218,504 worldwide 10 citations · 47 works
- 5 Pedro Paulo de Andrade Brazil · #260,085 worldwide 24 citations · 33 works
- 6 Nilcéia Aparecida Maciel Pinheiro Brazil · #263,730 worldwide 13 citations · 32 works
- 7 Márcio Mendonça Brazil · #263,942 worldwide 75 citations · 31 works
- 8 Roger Gules Brazil · #279,945 worldwide 215 citations · 16 works
- 9 Eduardo Félix Ribeiro Romaneli Brazil · #330,155 worldwide 185 citations · 15 works
- 10 Sérgio Augusto Oliveira da Silva Brazil · #334,023 worldwide 109 citations · 28 works
Which keywords describe research at Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Sustainability, Public Policy, Qualitative Research, Online Learning, Waste Management, Curriculum Development and Social Inequality.
- Didactic Models
- Active Learning
- Agroecology
- Pedagogical Practices
- Educational Policies
- Marketing Strategies
- Quantitative Research
- Educational Reform
- Innovation Management
- Data Analysis
- Media Education
- Eco-friendly Practices
- Digital Literacy
- Environmental Education
- Social Inequality
- Sustainable Development
- Environmental Impact
- Online Learning
- Public Policy
- Teacher Training
- Sustainability
- Qualitative Research
- Renewable Energy
- Educational Technology
- Curriculum Development
- Waste Management
- Biodiversity
- Water Resources
- Social Network Analysis
- Social Participation
- WebQuests
- Distance Learning
- Research Methods
- Science Education
- Case Study
- Organizational Management
- Inclusive Education
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Games
- Economic Analysis
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability469▲ 3.6×77 topics
- Teacher Training378▲ 11×19 topics
- Qualitative Research292▲ 6.3×18 topics
- Public Policy285▲ 11×15 topics
- Renewable Energy247▲ 3.2×43 topics
- Online Learning236▲ 5.3×13 topics
- Educational Technology233▲ 3.7×27 topics
- Environmental Impact217▲ 2.4×53 topics
- Curriculum Development206▲ 5.5×9 topics
- Sustainable Development205▲ 2.4×52 topics
- Waste Management178▲ 8.2×10 topics
- Social Inequality171▲ 12×10 topics
- Biodiversity169▲ 4.3×26 topics
- Environmental Education158▲ 20×7 topics
- Water Resources143▲ 11×6 topics
- Digital Literacy142▲ 4.5×6 topics
- Social Network Analysis139▲ 22×5 topics
- Eco-friendly Practices137▲ 43×2 topics
- Social Participation137▲ 41×2 topics
- Media Education137▲ 46×1 topic
- WebQuests137▲ 46×1 topic
- Data Analysis133▲ 9.2×10 topics
- Distance Learning129▲ 7.2×8 topics
- Innovation Management129▲ 15×4 topics
- Research Methods126▲ 14×2 topics
- Educational Reform125▲ 19×6 topics
- Science Education125▲ 38×3 topics
- Quantitative Research124▲ 17×2 topics
- Case Study124▲ 35×1 topic
- Marketing Strategies124▲ 24×2 topics
- Organizational Management124▲ 35×1 topic
- Educational Policies124▲ 20×2 topics
- Inclusive Education124▲ 6.6×8 topics
- Pedagogical Practices124▲ 26×3 topics
- Critical Pedagogy122▲ 27×2 topics
- Agroecology110▲ 14×4 topics
- Educational Games92▲ 18×2 topics
- Active Learning83▲ 8.6×5 topics
- Economic Analysis82▲ 10×4 topics
- Didactic Models81▲ 37×1 topic
Which research topics does Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Environmental Sustainability and Education, Education and Digital Technologies, Business and Management Studies and Education Pedagogy and Practices.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 137 works
- 2 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 137 works
- 3 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 124 works
- 4 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 121 works
- 5 Science and Education Research Education 81 works
- 6 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 75 works
- 7 Agricultural and Food Sciences Forestry 72 works
- 8 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 56 works
- 9 Education and Public Policy Political Science and International Relations 47 works
- 10 Chemistry Education and Research Education 43 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 44% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Curitiba
- Universidade Federal do Paraná
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
- Instituto Federal do Paraná
- UniBrasil Centro Universitário
- Universidade Positivo
- Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
- Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná
- Centro Universitário Curitiba
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.