University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony
In research, University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony stands highest in Health Sciences (#4,105 of 11,982 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#6,071 of 12,888 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,270 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Urban Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — Urban Studies is 11.2× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #7,294 of 28,054 · #14,405 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #93 of 714
- Research works
- 2.4k ▲ 214% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 9.1k 3.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 81% world 28%
What is University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #4,105 of 11,982 | 6.2% | 167 | #6587 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #6,071 of 12,888 | 14.3% | 165 | #12782 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,270 of 10,521 | 7.0% | 470 | #6738 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,611 of 6,365 | 7.0% | 345 | #5273 | |
| MedicineField | #6,327 of 10,443 | 6.0% | 84 | #12770 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,468 of 1,892 | 9.7% | 110 | #2219 | |
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #2,854 of 3,409 | 6.2% | 69 | #3828 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #6,542 of 7,800 | 12.8% | 97 | #11392 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #2,186 of 2,578 | 5.1% | 97 | #3468 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #1,695 of 1,928 | 6.0% | 70 | #3427 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#6,587 #4,105
- Physical Sciences#12,782 #6,071
- Social Sciences#6,738 #5,270
- Social Sciences#5,273 #3,611
- Medicine#12,770 #6,327
- Education#2,219 #1,468
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#3,828 #2,854
- Life Sciences#11,392 #6,542
- Sociology and Political Science#3,468 #2,186
- Health Professions#3,427 #1,695
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Urban Studies takes 11.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Urban StudiesSubfield · 27.8 works11×
- Literature and Literary TheorySubfield · 34.2 works7.2×
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 33.2 works6.3×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 3.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Social Sciences 3.0×
- Health Professions 3.0×
- Arts and Humanities 2.9×
- Nursing 2.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Environmental Science 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.8×
- Psychology 0.8×
- Veterinary 0.7×
- Dentistry 0.6×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Energy 0.5×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony?
Ranked on the composite score, Rafaella Pessoa Moreira, Antônio Roberto Xavier and Alexandre António ́Timbane lead among researchers whose main affiliation is University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony.
- 1 Rafaella Pessoa Moreira Brazil · #435,856 worldwide 28 citations · 26 works
- 2 Antônio Roberto Xavier Brazil · #479,777 worldwide 11 citations · 36 works
- 3 Alexandre António ́Timbane Brazil · #504,972 worldwide 0 citations · 30 works
- 4 Carolina Maria de Lima Carvalho Brazil · #577,352 worldwide 25 citations · 20 works
- 5 Lívia Barbosa Pacheco Souza Brazil · #621,927 worldwide 1 citations · 22 works
- 6 Edmara Chaves Costa Brazil · #627,037 worldwide 12 citations · 26 works
- 7 Maria Girlane Sousa Albuquerque Brandão Brazil · #680,174 worldwide 4 citations · 22 works
- 8 José Erivelton de Souza Maciel Ferreira Brazil · #684,172 worldwide 1 citations · 30 works
- 9 Elisângela André da Silva Costa Brazil · #757,308 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
- 10 Leilane Barbosa de Sousa Brazil · #763,105 worldwide 9 citations · 23 works
Which keywords describe research at University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Public Policy, Educational Technology, Social Inequality, Qualitative Research, Globalization, Cultural Identity and Public Health.
- Water Resources
- Intersectionality
- Digital Innovation
- Health Policy
- Anthropology
- Cultural Studies
- Agroecology
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Policies
- Pedagogical Practices
- Online Learning
- Social Movements
- Healthcare
- Quality of Life
- Education
- Colonialism
- Social Inequality
- Public Health
- Public Policy
- Globalization
- Teacher Training
- Educational Technology
- Sustainability
- Qualitative Research
- Cultural Identity
- Curriculum Development
- Brazil
- Identity
- Healthcare Access
- Mental Health
- Inclusive Education
- Distance Learning
- Discourse Analysis
- Educational Reform
- Health
- History
- Social Determinants
- Social Impact
- Smart Library
- Social Dynamics
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Teacher Training73▲ 13×8 topics
- Globalization70▲ 4.0×39 topics
- Educational Technology65▲ 6.1×13 topics
- Public Policy64▲ 14×14 topics
- Sustainability63▲ 2.9×37 topics
- Public Health62▲ 4.8×29 topics
- Qualitative Research58▲ 7.4×10 topics
- Social Inequality57▲ 24×6 topics
- Cultural Identity51▲ 11×8 topics
- Colonialism46▲ 11×16 topics
- Curriculum Development44▲ 7.0×4 topics
- Education44▲ 2.9×32 topics
- Brazil44▲ 50×5 topics
- Quality of Life39▲ 3.0×27 topics
- Identity38▲ 5.8×20 topics
- Healthcare38▲ 3.7×12 topics
- Healthcare Access36▲ 14×8 topics
- Social Movements34▲ 12×10 topics
- Mental Health32▲ 2.4×20 topics
- Online Learning32▲ 4.2×6 topics
- Inclusive Education31▲ 9.9×5 topics
- Pedagogical Practices31▲ 38×2 topics
- Distance Learning30▲ 10.0×4 topics
- Educational Policies30▲ 29×2 topics
- Discourse Analysis30▲ 13×5 topics
- Critical Pedagogy30▲ 38×3 topics
- Educational Reform29▲ 26×1 topic
- Agroecology29▲ 22×3 topics
- Health29▲ 8.0×7 topics
- Cultural Studies26▲ 7.8×13 topics
- History26▲ 4.1×19 topics
- Anthropology24▲ 28×6 topics
- Social Determinants23▲ 12×7 topics
- Health Policy22▲ 16×5 topics
- Social Impact21▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Digital Innovation20▲ 37×1 topic
- Smart Library20▲ 54×1 topic
- Intersectionality19▲ 12×5 topics
- Social Dynamics19▲ 35×3 topics
- Water Resources18▲ 8.2×5 topics
Which research topics does University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education Pedagogy and Practices, Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic, Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil and Health Education and Validation.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 29 works
- 2 Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic Information Systems 20 works
- 3 Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil Sociology and Political Science 18 works
- 4 Health Education and Validation Education 17 works
- 5 Linguistics and Education Research Literature and Literary Theory 16 works
- 6 Literature, Culture, and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 16 works
- 7 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 16 works
- 8 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 16 works
- 9 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 15 works
- 10 Youth, Drugs, and Violence Demography 15 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has University for International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 214% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Redenção
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.