Science Explorer Interactive view Map
University · Fort Kent · United States

University of Maine at Fort Kent

umfk.eduROR OpenAlex
Research works
66
▲ 52% vs 2013–17
Citations
625
9.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
33%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: University of Maine at Fort Kent is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 3.62× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Earth and Planetary Sciences: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.64× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMedicineNursing: 0.88× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 7.15× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 0.85× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.24× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 7.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at University of Maine at Fort Kent?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Identity, Nationalism, Climate Change, Biogeography, Phylogenetic Analysis, History, Mosses and Antioxidant Activity.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Identity8▲ 17×13 topics
  2. Climate Change7▲ 4.2×21 topics
  3. Nationalism6▲ 16×7 topics
  4. Biogeography5▲ 23×7 topics
  5. Phylogenetic Analysis5▲ 20×3 topics
  6. History5▲ 9.2×6 topics
  7. Antioxidant Activity4▲ 12×3 topics
  8. Mosses4▲ 181×2 topics
  9. Symbiosis4▲ 51×2 topics
  10. Biodiversity4▲ 7.6×10 topics
  11. Biomonitoring4▲ 48×1 topic
  12. Cultural Identity4▲ 13×3 topics
  13. Lichen4▲ 242×1 topic
  14. Globalization4▲ 3.0×10 topics
  15. Canada3▲ 176×1 topic
  16. Social Policy3▲ 36×1 topic
  17. Invasive Species3▲ 7.4×6 topics
  18. Biodiversity Conservation3▲ 15×4 topics
  19. Colonialism3▲ 8.2×6 topics
  20. Ecosystem Functioning2▲ 18×3 topics
  21. Conservation2▲ 7.6×4 topics
  22. Education2▲ 2.6×7 topics
  23. Innovation2▲ 3.7×3 topics
  24. Democracy2▲ 6.8×3 topics
  25. Ethics2▲ 5.4×5 topics
  26. Ethnicity2▲ 8.6×3 topics
  27. Literature2▲ 5.1×4 topics
  28. Scientific History2▲ 51×1 topic
  29. Technological Development2▲ 51×1 topic
  30. Forest Management2▲ 39×2 topics
  31. Radiology Errors2▲ 104×1 topic
  32. Structured Reporting2▲ 104×1 topic
  33. Vegetation1▲ 21×2 topics
  34. Climate Change Impacts1▲ 15×3 topics
  35. Color Psychology1▲ 60×1 topic
  36. Ecosystem1▲ 14×2 topics
  37. Kansei Engineering1▲ 60×1 topic
  38. Life Cycle Assessment1▲ 11×2 topics
  39. Race1▲ 16×3 topics
  40. Student Achievement1▲ 23×2 topics

Which research topics does University of Maine at Fort Kent publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Canadian Identity and History, Irish and British Studies, Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis and Cultural Identity and Heritage.

Canadian Identity and Hi…2Canadian Identity and History: 2 fractional worksIrish and British Studies1Irish and British Studies: 1 fractional worksHistorical Studies and S…1Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis: 1 fractional worksCultural Identity and Heritage: 1 fractional worksLichen and fungal ecology: 1 fractional worksSocial Sciences and Gove…0Social Sciences and Governance: 0 fractional worksForest Management and Policy: 0 fractional worksForest Biomass Utilization and Management: 0 fractional worksMilitary, Security, and Education Studies: 0 fractional worksHermeneutics and Narrative Identity: 0 fractional works
Sociology and Political ScienceHistory and Philosophy of ScienceArcheologyEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Canadian Identity and History Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  2. 2 Irish and British Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  3. 3 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
  4. 4 Cultural Identity and Heritage Archeology 1 works
  5. 5 Lichen and fungal ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
  6. 6 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 0 works
  7. 7 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  8. 8 Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Mechanics of Materials 0 works
  9. 9 Military, Security, and Education Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  10. 10 Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity Philosophy 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available33.1%not open66.9%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors13.0%domestic only87.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has University of Maine at Fort Kent's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 52% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.