| 1 |
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul‐Hus · Scientometrics
Open access |
19 Oct 2015 |
5,117 |
| 2 |
PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
Neal Haddaway, Matthew James Page, Chris C. Pritchard et al. · Campbell Systematic Reviews
Open access |
27 Mar 2022 |
3,425 |
| 3 |
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Per O. Seglen · BMJ
Open access |
15 Feb 1997 |
2,499 |
| 4 |
Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
Alberto Martín‐Martín, Enrique Orduña‐Malea, Mike A Thelwall et al. · Journal of Informetrics
Open access |
5 Oct 2018 |
1,943 |
| 5 |
A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus et al. · Asian Social Science
Open access |
27 Apr 2013 |
1,928 |
| 6 |
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis
Vivek Kumar Singh, Prashasti Singh, Mousumi Karmakar et al. · Scientometrics
Open access |
26 Mar 2021 |
1,815 |
| 7 |
A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
Junwen Zhu, Weishu Liu · Scientometrics
|
22 Feb 2020 |
1,520 |
| 8 |
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses
John P. A. Ioannidis · Milbank Quarterly
ReviewOpen access |
Sep 2016 |
1,517 |
| 9 |
Science of science
Santo Fortunato, Carl T. Bergstrom, Katy Börner et al. · Science
Open access |
Mar 2018 |
1,455 |
| 10 |
Scopus database: a review
Judy F. Burnham · Biomedical Digital Libraries
Open access |
8 Mar 2006 |
1,278 |
| 11 |
Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity
Caroline Birkle, David Pendlebury, Joshua D. Schnell et al. · Quantitative Science Studies
Open access |
23 Jan 2020 |
1,275 |
| 12 |
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
Heather Piwowar, Jason R Priem, Vincent Larivière et al. · PeerJ
Open access |
13 Feb 2018 |
1,259 |
| 13 |
Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories
Dag W. Aksnes, Liv Langfeldt, Paul F. Wouters · SAGE Open
Open access |
2019 |
1,256 |
| 14 |
NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition
S. Adams Becker, Malcolm Brown, Eden Dahlstrom et al.
|
2017 |
1,252 |
| 15 |
An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews
Rens van de Schoot, Jonathan de Bruin, Raoul Schram et al. · Nature Machine Intelligence
ReviewOpen access |
Feb 2021 |
1,168 |
| 16 |
Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Günther Eysenbach · Journal of Medical Internet Research
Open access |
16 Dec 2011 |
1,131 |
| 17 |
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
Alberto Martín‐Martín, Mike Thelwall, Enrique Orduna-Malea et al. · Scientometrics
Open access |
21 Sep 2020 |
1,001 |
| 18 |
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index
Peder Olesen Larsen, Markus von Ins · Scientometrics
Open access |
9 Mar 2010 |
977 |
| 19 |
Does the h index have predictive power?
J. E. Hirsch · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Open access |
27 Nov 2007 |
971 |
| 20 |
Predatory publishers are corrupting open access
Jeffrey Beall · Nature
Open access |
11 Sep 2012 |
965 |
| 21 |
Understanding Financial Conflicts of Interest
Dennis Frank Thompson · New England Journal of Medicine
|
19 Aug 1993 |
863 |
| 22 |
Reform retractions to make them more transparent
Quan‐Hoang Vuong · Nature
|
8 Jun 2020 |
834 |
| 23 |
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
Cenyu Shen, Bo‐Christer Björk · BMC Medicine
Open access |
Oct 2015 |
833 |
| 24 |
Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
Daniele Fanelli · PLoS ONE
Open access |
21 Apr 2010 |
829 |
| 25 |
The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
Mikael Laakso, Patrik Welling, Helena Bukvova et al. · PLoS ONE
Open access |
13 Jun 2011 |
774 |
| 26 |
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Nisa Bakkalbasi, Kathleen Bauer, Janis G. Glover et al. · Biomedical Digital Libraries
Open access |
29 Jun 2006 |
765 |
| 27 |
Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective
Rodrigo Costas, Zohreh Zahedi, Paul F. Wouters · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Open access |
28 Jul 2014 |
733 |
| 28 |
Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature
Michael W. Norris, Charles Oppenheim · Journal of Informetrics
|
7 Feb 2007 |
715 |
| 29 |
Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition
Marc A. Edwards, Siddhartha Roy · Environmental Engineering Science
Open access |
22 Sep 2016 |
709 |
| 30 |
Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
Henk F. Moed · Journal of Informetrics
|
20 Feb 2010 |
647 |
| 31 |
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Yassine Gargouri, Chawki Hajjem, Vincent Larivière et al. · PLoS ONE
Open access |
18 Oct 2010 |
611 |
| 32 |
Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?
Somnath Saha, Sanjay K. Saint, Dimitri Christakis · PubMed
Open access |
2003 |
589 |
| 33 |
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures
Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Aric A. Hagberg et al. · PLoS ONE
Open access |
26 Jun 2009 |
586 |
| 34 |
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review
Jonathan Peter Tennant, François Waldner, Damien Jacques et al. · F1000Research
Open access |
21 Sep 2016 |
574 |
| 35 |
When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable
Drummond Rennie · JAMA
|
20 Aug 1997 |
574 |
| 36 |
A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19
Yuetian Yu, Yujie Li, Zhongheng Zhang et al. · Annals of Translational Medicine
Open access |
Jul 2020 |
568 |
| 37 |
Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future
Donald de B. Beaver · Scientometrics
|
Nov 2001 |
531 |
| 38 |
Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009
Bo‐Christer Björk, Patrik Welling, Mikael Laakso et al. · PLoS ONE
Open access |
23 Jun 2010 |
529 |
| 39 |
Adams Becker, S.; Cummins, M.; Davis, A.; Freeman, A.; Hall Giesinger, C.; Ananthanarayanan, V. NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2017
Sebastián Gómez Jaramillo · Cuaderno activa
Open access |
2017 |
514 |
| 40 |
Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900
Vincent Larivière, Yves Gingras, Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al. · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
|
6 Nov 2014 |
495 |
| 41 |
The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape
Nicholas Fraser, Liam Brierley, Gautam Kumar Dey et al. · PLoS Biology
Open access |
2 Apr 2021 |
490 |
| 42 |
Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?
Blaise Cronin · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
|
2001 |
484 |
| 43 |
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact
Bo‐Christer Björk, David Solomon · BMC Medicine
Open access |
17 Jul 2012 |
483 |
| 44 |
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
John Antonakis · The Leadership Quarterly
Open access |
28 Jan 2017 |
482 |
| 45 |
Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact
András P. Schubert, T. Braun · Scientometrics
|
May 1986 |
465 |
| 46 |
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Björn Brembs, Katherine Susan Button, Marcus Robert Munafo · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Open access |
2013 |
459 |
| 47 |
What is open peer review? A systematic review
Tony Ross‐Hellauer · F1000Research
ReviewOpen access |
31 Aug 2017 |
458 |
| 48 |
The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations
Chun‐Ting Zhang · PLoS ONE
Open access |
4 May 2009 |
456 |
| 49 |
Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
Ernesto Roldán-Valadéz, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras et al. · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
|
3 Dec 2018 |
452 |
| 50 |
Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
Anders W Jørgensen, Jørgen Hilden, Peter Christian Gøtzsche · BMJ
ReviewOpen access |
6 Oct 2006 |
448 |