Topic · Delphi Technique in Research
Most cited papers in Delphi Technique in Research
What are the most cited papers in Delphi Technique in Research?
The most cited paper in Delphi Technique in Research is "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews" (Matthew James Page et al., 2021), with 105,915 citations. Next come "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement" (83,711) and "PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation" (43,960).
Showing 50 of 89 papers. Every paper with more than 1,598 citations is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Matthew James Page et al. · BMJ | 29 Mar 2021 | 105,915 |
| 2 | Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ | 21 Jul 2009 | 83,711 |
| 3 | PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation Andrea C. Tricco et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine | 3 Sep 2018 | 43,960 |
| 4 | RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials Jonathan A C Sterne et al. · BMJ | 28 Aug 2019 | 33,250 |
| 5 | Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement PRISMA-P Group, David Moher, Larissa Shamseer et al. · Systematic Reviews | 2015 | 27,092 |
| 6 | The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies Erik B von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine | 10 Oct 2007 | 22,347 |
| 7 | The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration Alessandro Liberati, Doug G. Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ | 21 Jul 2009 | 17,979 |
| 8 | Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation Larissa Shamseer, David Moher, Mike J Clarke et al. · BMJ | 2 Jan 2015 | 13,503 |
| 9 | PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews Matthew James Page et al. · BMJ | 29 Mar 2021 | 11,781 |
| 10 | Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach Zachary Munn, Micah D.J. Peters, Cindy Stern et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology | 19 Nov 2018 | 11,572 |
| 11 | Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide Tammy Hoffmann, Paul Glasziou, Isabelle Boutron et al. · BMJ | 7 Mar 2014 | 10,971 |
| 12 | AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both Beverley Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George A. Wells et al. · BMJ | 21 Sep 2017 | 10,915 |
| 13 | Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Mary L. McHugh · PubMed | 2012 | 9,245 |
| 14 | The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations Brian F. Hutton, Georgia Salanti, Deborah M Caldwell et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine | Jun 2015 | 8,528 |
| 15 | Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review Jane Webster, Richard Thomas Watson · MIS Quarterly | Jun 2002 | 7,348 |
| 16 | Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations Philip H. Quanjer, Sanja Stanojevic, Tim James Cole et al. · European Respiratory Journal | 27 Jun 2012 | 6,032 |
| 17 | Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study Cleusa P. Ferri, Martin James Prince, Carol Brayne et al. · The Lancet | Dec 2005 | 5,347 |
| 18 | Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Christopher Gerard Maher, Catherine Sherrington, Rob Herbert et al. · Physical Therapy | Aug 2003 | 4,840 |
| 19 | Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique Felicity Hasson, Sinead Keeney, Hugh McKenna · Journal of Advanced Nursing | Oct 2000 | 4,666 |
| 20 | The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure Marilyn Bergner, Ruth A. Bobbitt, William B. Carter et al. · Medical Care | Aug 1981 | 4,666 |
| 21 | The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers Quan Nha Hong, Sergi Fàbregues, Gillian Bartlett et al. · Education for Information | 13 Nov 2018 | 4,662 |
| 22 | International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Christina May Moran de Brito · Acta Fisiátrica | 2002 | 4,460 |
| 23 | Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline Mhairi Campbell, Joanne E. McKenzie, Amanda J. Sowden et al. · BMJ | 16 Jan 2020 | 4,457 |
| 24 | National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary Max Hirshkowitz, Kaitlyn Whiton, Steven M. Albert et al. · Sleep Health | Mar 2015 | 4,437 |
| 25 | The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study Lidwine Brigitta Mokkink, Caroline Barbara Terwee, Donald L. Patrick et al. · Quality of Life Research | 18 Feb 2010 | 4,362 |
| 26 | The Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise Capacity Index in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Bartolomé R. Celli, Claudia Côté, José María Marín et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 3 Mar 2004 | 4,077 |
| 27 | Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies Ivan R. Diamond, Robert C. Grant, Brian Michael Feldman et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 26 Feb 2014 | 3,802 |
| 28 | Asthma and Wheezing in the First Six Years of Life Fernando D. Martínez, Anne L. Wright, Lynn M. Taussig et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 19 Jan 1995 | 3,800 |
| 29 | Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations Robert H. Dworkin et al. · Pain | 6 Nov 2004 | 3,789 |
| 30 | CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials Sandra M Eldridge, Claire L Chan, Michael Joseph Campbell et al. · BMJ | 24 Oct 2016 | 3,662 |
| 31 | Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission Gill Livingston et al. · The Lancet | 31 Jul 2024 | 3,635 |
| 32 | The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews Penny F. Whiting, Anne WS Rutjes, Johannes B. Reitsma et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology | 10 Nov 2003 | 3,635 |
| 33 | Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research Jeremy M. Jones, Duncan J. W. Hunter · BMJ | 5 Aug 1995 | 3,558 |
| 34 | Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations Dennis C. Turk et al. · Pain | 22 Sep 2003 | 3,518 |
| 35 | PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews Melissa Lyle Rethlefsen et al. · Systematic Reviews | 26 Jan 2021 | 3,377 |
| 36 | Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline Vishesh K. Kapur, Dennis H. Auckley, Susmita Chowdhuri et al. · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine | 14 Mar 2017 | 3,262 |
| 37 | Evaluating model fit. Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler | 1995 | 3,204 |
| 38 | OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis T.E. McAlindon, Raveendhara R. Bannuru, Matthew C. Sullivan et al. · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage | 24 Jan 2014 | 3,183 |
| 39 | CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials on behalf of the PAFS consensus group, Sandra M Eldridge, Claire L Chan et al. · Pilot and Feasibility Studies | 20 Oct 2016 | 3,026 |
| 40 | Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Janine Bestall, ELIZABETH A. PAUL, R. Garrod et al. · Thorax | Jul 1999 | 2,976 |
| 41 | Development of the asthma control test Robert A. Nathan, Christine A. Sorkness, Mark R. Kosinski et al. · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2004 | 2,939 |
| 42 | Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Marcelo B. P. Amato, Maureen O. Meade, Arthur S. Slutsky et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 18 Feb 2015 | 2,879 |
| 43 | Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting Heather L. Colquhoun, Danielle Elaine Levac, Kelly K. O’Brien et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 14 Jul 2014 | 2,864 |
| 44 | The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire Paul Jones, Frances H. Quirk, Chloë M. Baveystock · Respiratory Medicine | Sep 1991 | 2,720 |
| 45 | The Delphi technique: myths and realities Catherine Powell · Journal of Advanced Nursing | Feb 2003 | 2,690 |
| 46 | Summarizing systematic reviews Edoardo Aromataris, Ritin Santiago Fernandez, Christina M. Godfrey et al. · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare | 8 Jul 2015 | 2,669 |
| 47 | CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials Marion Campbell, Diana Ruth Elbourne, Douglas G. Altman · BMJ | 18 Mar 2004 | 2,586 |
| 48 | Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments Carson K. L. Lo, Dominik Mertz, Mark B Loeb · BMC Medical Research Methodology | Apr 2014 | 2,555 |
| 49 | The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis Gene Rowe, GEORGE N. WRIGHT · International Journal of Forecasting | Oct 1999 | 2,538 |
| 50 | Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 23 Feb 2015 | 2,536 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for a field when OpenAlex files it under one of the field's topics; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.