Most cited papers in Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
What are the most cited papers in Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging?
The most cited paper in Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging is "The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository" (Kenneth Clark, Bruce A. Vendt, Kirk Smith et al., 2013), with 4,730 citations. Next come "Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer" (2,510) and "Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis" (2,174).
Showing 50 of 100 papers. Every paper with more than 484 citations is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository Kenneth Clark, Bruce A. Vendt, Kirk Smith et al. · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | 24 Jul 2013 | 4,730 |
| 2 | Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer Norman F. Boyd, Helen Guo, Lisa Joy Martin et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 17 Jan 2007 | 2,510 |
| 3 | Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis Valerie McCormack, Isabel dos‐Santos‐Silva · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Jun 2006 | 2,174 |
| 4 | Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Albert L. Siu, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force · Annals of Internal Medicine | 12 Jan 2016 | 2,144 |
| 5 | Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians John D. Mathews, A. Forsythe, Zoe Brady et al. · BMJ | 21 May 2013 | 2,035 |
| 6 | Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults Perry J. Pickhardt, J. Richard Choi, Inku Hwang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 3 Dec 2003 | 1,977 |
| 7 | Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening Etta D. Pisano, Constantine A. Gatsonis, Edward R. Hendrick et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 16 Sep 2005 | 1,945 |
| 8 | Screening for breast cancer with mammography Peter Christian Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 4 Jun 2013 | 1,882 |
| 9 | Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom D. Louis Collins, Alex P. Zijdenbos, Vasken Kollokian et al. · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | Jun 1998 | 1,849 |
| 10 | Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations T M Kolb, Jacob Lichy, Jeffrey H. Newhouse · Radiology | Oct 2002 | 1,727 |
| 11 | Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk Kevin Charles Oeffinger, Elizabeth T. H. Fontham, Ruth Etzioni et al. · JAMA | 20 Oct 2015 | 1,670 |
| 12 | The Theory and Practice of Scintillation Counting J. B. Birks, F.W.K. Firk · Physics Today | Aug 1965 | 1,583 |
| 13 | Estimating Risk of Cancer Associated With Radiation Exposure From 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Milena J. Henzlova, Sanjay Rajagopalan · JAMA | 17 Jul 2007 | 1,418 |
| 14 | Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures Reza Fazel, Harlan M. Krumholz, Yongfei Wang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 26 Aug 2009 | 1,343 |
| 15 | 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research W. Paul Segars, Gregory M. Sturgeon, S. Mendonca et al. · Medical Physics | 24 Aug 2010 | 1,304 |
| 16 | Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Wendie A. Berg, C Campassi, PATRICIA W. LANGENBERG et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology | Jun 2000 | 1,280 |
| 17 | Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Heidi D Nelson, Kari Tyne, Arpana M. Naik et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine | 17 Nov 2009 | 1,254 |
| 18 | INbreast Ines C. Moreira, Igor Amaral, Inês Domingues et al. · Academic Radiology | 11 Nov 2011 | 1,188 |
| 19 | Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lennarth Nyström, Ingvar Andersson, Nils Bjurstam et al. · The Lancet | Mar 2002 | 1,184 |
| 20 | Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval Dina Demner‐Fushman, Marc D. Kohli, Marc B. Rosenman et al. · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | Jul 2015 | 1,174 |
| 21 | Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography Patricia A. Carney, Diana L. Miglioretti, Bonnie C. Yankaskas et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine | 4 Feb 2003 | 1,152 |
| 22 | Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Linda L. Humphrey, Mark Helfand, Benjamin K.S. Chan et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine | 3 Sep 2002 | 1,143 |
| 23 | Quantitative Classification of Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk: Results From the Canadian National Breast Screening Study Norman F. Boyd, J W Byng, Roberta A. Jong et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 3 May 1995 | 1,113 |
| 24 | Body Mass Index, Serum Sex Hormones, and Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women Endogenous Hormones Breast Cancer Collaborative Group · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 19 Aug 2003 | 1,100 |
| 25 | Screening for Breast Cancer Joann G. Elmore · JAMA | 8 Mar 2005 | 1,076 |
| 26 | Efficacy of Screening Mammography Karla Kerlikowske, Deborah G. Grady, Susan M. Rubin et al. · JAMA | 11 Jan 1995 | 1,061 |
| 27 | Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis Mohammad Hossein Forouzanfar, Kyle J Foreman, Allyne M Delossantos et al. · The Lancet | 15 Sep 2011 | 1,036 |
| 28 | Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers Margaret T. Mandelson · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 5 Jul 2000 | 1,034 |
| 29 | Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program Per Skaane, Andriy I. Bandos, Randi Gullien et al. · Radiology | 8 Jan 2013 | 1,010 |
| 30 | Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups Kathleen J. Yost, Carin I. Perkins, Richard. D. Cohen et al. · Cancer Causes & Control | Oct 2001 | 971 |
| 31 | Use of Diagnostic Imaging Studies and Associated Radiation Exposure for Patients Enrolled in Large Integrated Health Care Systems, 1996-2010 Rebecca Smith‐Bindman, Diana L. Miglioretti, Eric Egan Johnson et al. · JAMA | 12 Jun 2012 | 910 |
| 32 | Mammographic Features and Breast Cancer Risk: Effects With Time, Age, and Menopause Status Celia Byrne, Catherine Schairer, J. Wolfe et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute | Nov 1995 | 872 |
| 33 | Multisection CT Protocols: Sex- and Age-specific Conversion Factors Used to Determine Effective Dose from Dose-Length Product Paul D. Deak, Yulia Smal, Willi A. Kalender · Radiology | 17 Sep 2010 | 857 |
| 34 | Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography Sarah M. Friedewald, Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Stephen L. Rose et al. · JAMA | 24 Jun 2014 | 849 |
| 35 | Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study Stefano Ciatto, Nehmat Houssami, Daniela Bernardi et al. · The Lancet Oncology | 25 Apr 2013 | 838 |
| 36 | Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. N F Boyd, Gina A Lockwood, J W Byng et al. · PubMed | Dec 1998 | 810 |
| 37 | Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential James T. Dobbins, Devon Godfrey · Physics in Medicine and Biology | 16 Sep 2003 | 809 |
| 38 | Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 Decades László K. Tabár, Bedrich Viták, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen et al. · Radiology | 28 Jun 2011 | 799 |
| 39 | Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms Etta D. Pisano, Shuquan Zong, Bradley M. Hemminger et al. · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Nov 1998 | 769 |
| 40 | Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Loren T. Niklason et al. · Radiology | Nov 1997 | 766 |
| 41 | A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device Ehsan Samei, Michael J. Flynn, David A. Reimann · Medical Physics | 1998 | 759 |
| 42 | Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center Timothy W. Freer, Michael J. Ulissey · Radiology | Sep 2001 | 755 |
| 43 | Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. Anthony B. Miller, Cornelia J. Baines, Timothy H. M. To et al. · PubMed | 15 Nov 1992 | 754 |
| 44 | Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography Yadon Arad, Louise A. Spadaro, Ken Goodman et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology | Oct 2000 | 749 |
| 45 | Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness H. Gilbert Welch, Philip C. Prorok, A. James O’Malley et al. · New England Journal of Medicine | 12 Oct 2016 | 747 |
| 46 | Learned Primal-Dual Reconstruction Jonas Adler, Ozan Oktem · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 29 Jan 2018 | 746 |
| 47 | Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening László K. Tabár, Ming‐Fang Yen, Bedrich Viták et al. · The Lancet | Apr 2003 | 742 |
| 48 | Electron-Beam Tomography Coronary Artery Calcium and Cardiac Events George T. Kondos, Julie Anne Hoff, Alexander Sevrukov et al. · Circulation | 13 May 2003 | 738 |
| 49 | Telemedicine Richard Wootton · BMJ | 8 Sep 2001 | 713 |
| 50 | A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Melvin J. Silverstein, Michael D. Lagios, Pamela H. Craig et al. · Cancer | Jun 1996 | 705 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for a field when OpenAlex files it under one of the field's topics; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.