Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Insect Utilization and Effects

Insect Utilization and Effects is a research topic within Insect Science. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1950. 20.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the potential of edible insects as a sustainable source of food and feed, addressing topics such as nutritional composition, environmental impact, consumer acceptance, waste management, and their role in ensuring food security. It covers a wide range of research on insect farming, sustainability, and the use of insects as a protein source for both human and animal consumption.

  • Edible Insects
  • Food Security
  • Animal Feed
  • Nutritional Composition
  • Environmental Impact
  • Insect Farming
  • Sustainability
  • Consumer Acceptance
  • Waste Management
  • Protein Source
Research works
25k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
5.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
20.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+84%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Insect Utilization and Effects research?

By volume, China and Indonesia publish the most (960 and 623 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 960 works
  2. 2 Indonesia 623 works
  3. 3 India 495 works
  4. 4 United States 456 works
  5. 5 Brazil 282 works
  6. 6 Italy 225 works
  7. 7 South Korea 214 works
  8. 8 France 170 works
  9. 9 Germany 149 works
  10. 10 Spain 143 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 25.8%Indonesia: 16.8%India: 13.3%United States: 12.3%6 others listed: 31.8%26%largest
China960 · 25.8%Indonesia623 · 16.8%India495 · 13.3%United States456 · 12.3%6 others listed1,184 · 31.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Insect Utilization and Effects research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Zambia publishes the most Insect Utilization and Effects research, followed by Institute of Natural Sciences and Wageningen University & Research.

Who are the leading researchers in Insect Utilization and Effects?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Insect Utilization and Effects include Ahmadali Enayati and Ramaswamy Govindan.

  1. 1 Ahmadali Enayati Iran 2.3k citations
  2. 2 Ramaswamy Govindan United States 2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Insect Utilization and Effects research done?

The largest centres of Insect Utilization and Effects research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Seoul (South Korea), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Lusaka (Zambia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bondo, Lusaka and Volos.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 141 works
  2. 2 Seoul South Korea 58 works
  3. 3 Jakarta Indonesia 58 works
  4. 4 Lusaka Zambia 55 works
  5. 5 Brussels Belgium 53 works
  6. 6 Paris France 53 works
  7. 7 Guangzhou China 49 works
  8. 8 Bogor Indonesia 49 works
  9. 9 Nairobi Kenya 46 works
  10. 10 Wageningen Netherlands 43 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BondoKE · 24.8 works185×
  2. LusakaZM · 54.6 works32×
  3. VolosGR · 22.9 works17×
  4. WageningenNL · 43.4 works17×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Insect Utilization and Effects than the world average.

See Insect Utilization and Effects on the map

Where is the best place to study Insect Utilization and Effects?

Among universities, judged by research, Wageningen University & Research, Huazhong Agricultural University and University of Thessaly score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%mean 42.51%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Wageningen University & Research: 42, 46.9%Huazhong Agricultural University: 22, 49.1%University of Thessaly: 23, 40.0%Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 11, 40.8%Czech University of Life Sciences Prague: 9, 45.1%IPB University: 42, 13.0%University of Turin: 20, 57.5%Kasetsart University: 15, 23.3%University of Parma: 9, 50.6%University of Pisa: 12, 58.8%Huazhong Agricultura…Wageningen Universit…Swedish University o…University of Thessaly
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Wageningen University & ResearchNetherlands 86.646.9%18.2×42 +263.0%
2 Huazhong Agricultural UniversityChina 68.349.1%10.0×22 +44.9%
3 University of ThessalyGreece 67.340.0%17.6×23 +83.7%
4 Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesSweden 65.640.8%10.8×11 +138.1%
5 Czech University of Life Sciences PragueCzechia 65.645.1%14.5×9 +135.0%
6 IPB UniversityIndonesia 65.313.0%11.5×42 +327.6%
7 University of TurinItaly 63.257.5%6.3×20
8 Kasetsart UniversityThailand 61.023.3%11.3×15 +244.6%
9 University of ParmaItaly 60.950.6%6.5×9 +292.2%
10 University of PisaItaly 60.658.8%4.0×12 +378.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Insect Utilization and Effects research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 84% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Insect Utilization and Effects.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.