Chinese University of Hong Kong vs Fudan University

On research quality in 2022-now, Fudan University ranks #26 in the world and Chinese University of Hong Kong #29, of 28,054 institutions. Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 5 of the 13 fields both publish in, Fudan University in 8.

Research profiles alike: 0.48similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Chinese University of Hong Kong

China · Hong Kong

World rank, 2022-now: #29; #144 all time
Works, 2022-now: 14k; fractional
Top-10% rate: 29.1%; share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access: 32%; of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Geophysics.

Fudan University

China · Shanghai

World rank, 2022-now: #26; #232 all time
Works, 2022-now: 23k; fractional
Top-10% rate: 25.1%; share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access: 31%; of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Computational Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Acoustics and Ultrasonics.

Who leads in each field?

Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 5 of 13 fields, Fudan University in 8. Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

Chinese University of Hong Kong 58 Fudan University

#77Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#23
-Chemistry#49
#17Computer Science#49
#61Earth and Planetary Sciences-
-Economics, Econometrics and Finance#43
#62Engineering#60
-Environmental Science#59
-Immunology and Microbiology#14
#113Materials Science#43
#29Medicine#39
-Physics and Astronomy#42
#34Psychology-
#33Social Sciences#169

Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.

Where does each put its research?

Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.

¼×½×1×2×4×
Psychology1.9× 0.5×
Arts and Humanities0.8× 0.3×
Social Sciences1.0× 0.4×
Health Professions0.8× 0.3×
Decision Sciences1.1× 0.7×
Nursing0.8× 0.5×
Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.5×
Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.2×
Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.2× 1.0×
Dentistry0.6× 0.5×
Medicine1.2× 1.0×
Earth and Planetary Sciences1.2× 1.2×
Computer Science1.5× 1.6×
Veterinary0.2× 0.2×
Environmental Science0.7× 0.8×
Neuroscience1.3× 1.6×
Mathematics1.3× 1.7×
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.8× 1.1×
Engineering0.8× 1.2×
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.1× 1.6×
Physics and Astronomy1.1× 1.7×
Immunology and Microbiology1.0× 1.5×
Energy0.6× 1.3×
Chemical Engineering0.6× 1.5×
Chemistry0.6× 1.7×
Materials Science0.6× 1.8×

Chinese University of Hong KongFudan University

Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Chinese University of Hong Kong leans further are at the top, Fudan University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.

How has their output grown?

Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.

Which publishes more research, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Fudan University?

Fudan University publishes 1.6× as much research as Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2022-now (23k against 14k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Fudan University?

29.1% of Chinese University of Hong Kong's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 25.1% for Fudan University.

Other comparisons

Compare any two