Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Piscataway · United States

Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science

In research, Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science stands highest in Physical Sciences (#5,385 of 21,541 worldwide), Computer Science (#2,142 of 7,020 worldwide) and Engineering (#4,323 of 11,412 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, 2022–2025
#24,335
of 28,054 · #8,508 all time
Rank in United States
#3,655
of 4,192
Research works
1.5k
▼ 32% vs 2013–17
Citations
22k
15.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.9%
record average 16.5%
Open access
40%
world 28%

What is Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #5,385 of 21,541 13.4%1,055
Computer ScienceField #2,142 of 7,020 13.6%474
EngineeringField #4,323 of 11,412 16.0%311
MathematicsField #1,130 of 2,255 9.8%185
Social SciencesDomain #9,991 of 16,945 11.5%286
Artificial IntelligenceSubfield #2,313 of 2,981 16.1%128
Computational Theory and MathematicsSubfield #925 of 1,086 13.7%170

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.29× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.29× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.46× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.45× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 3.80× its world share, 28 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.71× its world share, 10 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.26× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 13.05× its world share, 15 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.99× its world share, 2 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.18× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.20× its world share, 4 worksMedicineVeterinary: 1.93× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.63× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.02× its world share, 3 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.39× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.61× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.62× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.42× its world share, 17 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Mathematics, 13.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science?

Ranked on the composite score, James Abello, Morten Rosenmeier and Vincent Bakker lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.

  1. 1 James Abello United States · #237,460 worldwide 167 citations · 24 works
  2. 2 Morten Rosenmeier United States · #550,426 worldwide 2 citations · 37 works
  3. 3 Vincent Bakker United States · #1,281,512 worldwide 58 citations · 15 works
  4. 4 Henrik Udsen United States · #1,329,891 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science

Which keywords describe research at Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, Approximation Algorithms, Algorithmic Applications, Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, ECHR, European Legal Systems and Graph Theory.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Human Rights7▲ 6.8×8 topics
  2. Approximation Algorithms6▲ 88×4 topics
  3. Algorithmic Applications6▲ 171×2 topics
  4. Constitutionalism5▲ 54×3 topics
  5. Judicial Review5▲ 53×2 topics
  6. ECHR4▲ 117×1 topic
  7. European Legal Systems4▲ 117×1 topic
  8. Graph Theory4▲ 40×1 topic
  9. Parameterized Complexity4▲ 204×1 topic
  10. Graph Labeling3▲ 210×1 topic
  11. Metric Dimension3▲ 210×1 topic
  12. Graph Limits2▲ 280×1 topic
  13. Szemerédi's Theorem2▲ 280×1 topic
  14. Social Sciences2▲ 16×3 topics
  15. Parallel Computing2▲ 18×3 topics
  16. Copyright2▲ 75×2 topics
  17. Power Optimization2▲ 76×2 topics
  18. Discourse Analysis2▲ 7.5×3 topics
  19. European Union2▲ 8.2×5 topics
  20. Matrix Computations2▲ 70×1 topic
  21. Numerical Linear Algebra2▲ 70×1 topic
  22. Gender Studies2▲ 12×2 topics
  23. Learning2▲ 6.0×2 topics
  24. Combinatorial Optimization2▲ 119×1 topic
  25. Complexity Theory2▲ 33×1 topic
  26. Cryptography2▲ 14×2 topics
  27. Health Policy2▲ 11×3 topics
  28. Intellectual Property Rights2▲ 21×2 topics
  29. International Trade2▲ 11×2 topics
  30. FPGA2▲ 42×2 topics
  31. Methodology2▲ 34×1 topic
  32. Resource Allocation2▲ 8.7×2 topics
  33. Special Education2▲ 28×1 topic
  34. Causal Discovery1▲ 45×2 topics
  35. Error-Correcting Codes1▲ 44×2 topics
  36. Mobile Robots1▲ 15×1 topic
  37. Online Algorithms1▲ 81×1 topic
  38. Interacting Particle Systems1▲ 110×1 topic
  39. Network Analysis1▲ 12×2 topics
  40. Scaling Limits1▲ 110×1 topic

Which research topics does Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: European and International Law Studies, Advanced Graph Theory Research, Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems and Limits and Structures in Graph Theory.

  1. 1 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  2. 2 Advanced Graph Theory Research Computational Theory and Mathematics 4 works
  3. 3 Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems Computational Theory and Mathematics 3 works
  4. 4 Limits and Structures in Graph Theory Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 3 works
  5. 5 Matrix Theory and Algorithms Computational Theory and Mathematics 2 works
  6. 6 Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs Computational Theory and Mathematics 2 works
  7. 7 Social and Educational Sciences Education 2 works
  8. 8 Optimization and Search Problems Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
  9. 9 Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics Mathematical Physics 1 works
  10. 10 Intellectual Property Law Law 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available40.5%not open59.5%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.8%domestic only74.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 32% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Piscataway

All research institutions in Piscataway

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.