Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Santiago · Chile

Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies

Research works
69
▲ 145% vs 2013–17
Citations
1k
15.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
67%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.17× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Neuroscience: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.46× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.78× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.35× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.35× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 1.50× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 3.34× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.42× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.80× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.82× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.05× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.50× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.52× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainability, Climate Change, Biodiversity Conservation, Food Security, Globalization, Biodiversity, Land Use Change and Social Movements.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change9▲ 4.7×30 topics
  2. Sustainability8▲ 6.3×25 topics
  3. Globalization5▲ 3.8×20 topics
  4. Biodiversity Conservation4▲ 23×7 topics
  5. Environmental Impact4▲ 3.9×14 topics
  6. Food Security4▲ 13×8 topics
  7. Biodiversity3▲ 6.2×12 topics
  8. Quality of Life3▲ 3.3×9 topics
  9. Sustainable Development3▲ 3.9×11 topics
  10. Mental Health3▲ 3.9×10 topics
  11. Innovation3▲ 4.5×13 topics
  12. Land Use Change3▲ 14×3 topics
  13. Social Movements3▲ 12×7 topics
  14. Agriculture3▲ 15×5 topics
  15. Rural Development2▲ 12×8 topics
  16. Renewable Energy2▲ 3.3×7 topics
  17. Urbanization2▲ 10×6 topics
  18. Welfare State2▲ 33×4 topics
  19. Economic Crisis2▲ 31×2 topics
  20. Latin America2▲ 16×4 topics
  21. Climate Change Impacts2▲ 21×3 topics
  22. Ecosystem Services2▲ 8.5×6 topics
  23. Migrant Integration2▲ 75×2 topics
  24. Public Policy2▲ 6.4×9 topics
  25. Social Networks2▲ 13×4 topics
  26. Sustainable Agriculture2▲ 9.9×5 topics
  27. Aging Population2▲ 30×2 topics
  28. Gender Differences2▲ 7.8×2 topics
  29. Inequality2▲ 9.8×5 topics
  30. Agroecology2▲ 18×5 topics
  31. Environmental Services2▲ 85×1 topic
  32. Indigenous Knowledge2▲ 33×4 topics
  33. Tropical Deforestation2▲ 85×1 topic
  34. Vulnerability2▲ 14×3 topics
  35. Community Intervention2▲ 68×1 topic
  36. Environmental Policy2▲ 14×3 topics
  37. Social Integration2▲ 58×2 topics
  38. Social Work2▲ 28×1 topic
  39. Environmental Impact Assessment1▲ 38×2 topics
  40. Smallholder Farmers1▲ 15×3 topics

Which research topics does Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Rural Development and Agriculture, International Law and Human Rights and Business, Innovation, and Economy.

  1. 1 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 1 works
  2. 2 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
  3. 3 International Law and Human Rights Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  4. 4 Business, Innovation, and Economy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  5. 5 Global Peace and Security Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  6. 6 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 0 works
  7. 7 Mining and Resource Management Building and Construction 0 works
  8. 8 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 0 works
  9. 9 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 0 works
  10. 10 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available66.8%not open33.2%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors54.1%domestic only45.9%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 145% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Santiago

All research institutions in Santiago

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.