Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center
In research, Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,160 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #20,061 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #4,339 of 8,685
- Research works
- 348 ▼ 7% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.2k 20.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 6% world 28%
What is Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,160 of 16,945 | 14.8% | 135 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 14.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
Who are the top researchers at Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center?
Ranked on the composite score, Joseph F. Coates, Ronald J. Pekala and Margaret Mercer lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
- 1 Joseph F. Coates United States · #335,289 worldwide 91 citations · 71 works
- 2 Ronald J. Pekala United States · #419,927 worldwide 79 citations · 21 works
- 3 Margaret Mercer United States · #990,383 worldwide 8 citations · 21 works
- 4 George Ainslie United States · #1,494,099 worldwide 42 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Depression, Emotion Regulation, Meta-Analysis, Mental Health, Neuroscience, Emotion, Neurobiological Mechanisms and Clinical Trials.
- Self-Experience
- Neural Mechanisms
- Therapeutic Alliance
- Psychopathology
- Embodiment
- Psychometric Evaluation
- High-Strength Steels
- Trauma
- Neurobiology
- Prefrontal Cortex
- Resilience
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Ethics
- Stress
- Nocebo
- Microstructure
- Emotion
- Neuroscience
- Emotion Regulation
- Depression
- Epidemiology
- Mental Health
- Meta-Analysis
- Clinical Trials
- Neurobiological Mechanisms
- Decision Making
- Placebo
- Neurological Disorders
- Anxiety
- Psychiatric Disorders
- Cognitive Therapy
- Psychology
- Prevalence
- Grain Refinement
- Martensite Transformation
- Anxiety Disorders
- Phenomenology
- Psychotherapy Outcome
- DSM
- Risk Aversion
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology22▲ 1.57×31 topics
- Depression19▲ 7.2×17 topics
- Mental Health18▲ 4.6×20 topics
- Emotion Regulation16▲ 14×7 topics
- Meta-Analysis15▲ 7.7×12 topics
- Neuroscience13▲ 12×12 topics
- Clinical Trials13▲ 5.9×5 topics
- Emotion12▲ 19×6 topics
- Neurobiological Mechanisms12▲ 70×2 topics
- Microstructure11▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Decision Making11▲ 13×4 topics
- Nocebo10▲ 145×1 topic
- Placebo10▲ 145×1 topic
- Stress10▲ 7.2×8 topics
- Neurological Disorders9▲ 4.0×11 topics
- Ethics9▲ 5.7×8 topics
- Anxiety9▲ 7.3×9 topics
- Evidence-Based Practice9▲ 15×5 topics
- Psychiatric Disorders9▲ 16×4 topics
- Resilience9▲ 6.4×8 topics
- Cognitive Therapy8▲ 23×3 topics
- Prefrontal Cortex8▲ 16×3 topics
- Psychology8▲ 16×6 topics
- Neurobiology8▲ 6.6×8 topics
- Prevalence7▲ 5.2×7 topics
- Trauma7▲ 11×6 topics
- Grain Refinement6▲ 13×2 topics
- High-Strength Steels6▲ 38×1 topic
- Martensite Transformation6▲ 38×1 topic
- Psychometric Evaluation6▲ 26×2 topics
- Anxiety Disorders6▲ 14×2 topics
- Embodiment6▲ 9.4×3 topics
- Phenomenology6▲ 13×2 topics
- Psychopathology6▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Psychotherapy Outcome5▲ 37×1 topic
- Therapeutic Alliance5▲ 37×1 topic
- DSM5▲ 40×1 topic
- Neural Mechanisms5▲ 13×3 topics
- Risk Aversion5▲ 58×1 topic
- Self-Experience5▲ 40×1 topic
Which research topics does Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies and Sleep and related disorders.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 2 Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research Transplantation 0 works
- 3 Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
- 4 Sleep and related disorders Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 5 Migration, Health and Trauma Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 6 Suicide and Self-Harm Studies Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 7 Behavioral Health and Interventions Applied Psychology 0 works
- 8 Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies Automotive Engineering 0 works
- 9 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 10 Identity, Memory, and Therapy Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Coatesville
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.