Consortium of Universities for Global Health
In research, Consortium of Universities for Global Health stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,781 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Arts and Humanities — Arts and Humanities is 15.0× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,732 of 28,054 · #36,407 all time
- Rank in United States
- #3,720 of 4,192
- Research works
- 1.2k ▲ 17% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.5k 2.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 99% world 28%
What is Consortium of Universities for Global Health known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,781 of 10,521 | 12.5% | 61 | #10375 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Consortium of Universities for Global Health sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Consortium of Universities for Global Health specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Arts and Humanities takes 15.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 35.2 works15×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 15.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 15.0×
- Social Sciences 1.8×
- Computer Science 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.4×
- Psychology 1.4×
- Health Professions 1.0×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Engineering 0.0×
- Mathematics 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Consortium of Universities for Global Health?
Ranked on the composite score, Jean-François Draperi, Jacques Allard and Paul-Émile Langevin lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Consortium of Universities for Global Health.
- 1 Jean-François Draperi United States · #297,138 worldwide 3 citations · 46 works
- 2 Jacques Allard United States · #475,760 worldwide 6 citations · 24 works
- 3 Paul-Émile Langevin United States · #478,909 worldwide 2 citations · 22 works
- 4 Claude Beausoleil United States · #495,628 worldwide 1 citations · 21 works
- 5 Thérèse De Raedt United States · #579,198 worldwide 3 citations · 21 works
- 6 Louise Milot United States · #661,163 worldwide 0 citations · 17 works
- 7 Denis Germain United States · #849,901 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 8 Niels Planel United States · #1,025,185 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 9 Bruno Roy United States · #1,328,473 worldwide 3 citations · 23 works
- 10 Camille Martin United States · #1,390,234 worldwide 0 citations · 89 works
Which keywords describe research at Consortium of Universities for Global Health?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cultural Studies, Semiotics, Ethnography, Digital Communication, Documentary Practices, Social Media, Sociology and Pragmatics.
- Gender Roles
- Memory Studies
- Cultural Diversity
- International Relations
- Memory
- Narrative
- Pragmatism
- Gender Studies
- Culture
- Colonialism
- History
- Gender
- Identity
- Communication
- Discourse Analysis
- New Media
- Pragmatics
- Social Media
- Digital Communication
- Semiotics
- Cultural Studies
- Ethnography
- Documentary Practices
- Sociology
- Information Studies
- Argumentation
- Anthropology
- Literature
- Philosophy
- Education
- Globalization
- Feminism
- Democracy
- Dewey
- Ethics
- Nationalism
- Religion
- Box Office
- Film Industry
- Community Engagement
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Cultural Studies11▲ 36×6 topics
- Semiotics10▲ 323×3 topics
- Ethnography9▲ 66×3 topics
- Digital Communication8▲ 146×2 topics
- Documentary Practices8▲ 384×2 topics
- Social Media8▲ 7.3×3 topics
- Sociology8▲ 72×3 topics
- Pragmatics8▲ 59×2 topics
- Information Studies8▲ 442×1 topic
- New Media8▲ 229×1 topic
- Argumentation7▲ 285×1 topic
- Discourse Analysis7▲ 35×1 topic
- Anthropology7▲ 88×1 topic
- Communication7▲ 28×1 topic
- Literature7▲ 16×13 topics
- Identity6▲ 11×10 topics
- Philosophy6▲ 18×7 topics
- Gender6▲ 13×10 topics
- Education5▲ 3.3×6 topics
- History5▲ 8.2×7 topics
- Globalization4▲ 2.8×9 topics
- Colonialism4▲ 11×6 topics
- Feminism4▲ 17×2 topics
- Culture4▲ 8.7×5 topics
- Democracy4▲ 13×3 topics
- Gender Studies4▲ 31×5 topics
- Dewey3▲ 842×1 topic
- Pragmatism3▲ 147×1 topic
- Ethics3▲ 7.5×9 topics
- Narrative3▲ 21×6 topics
- Nationalism3▲ 6.9×3 topics
- Memory2▲ 13×4 topics
- Religion2▲ 6.5×5 topics
- International Relations2▲ 12×3 topics
- Box Office2▲ 109×1 topic
- Cultural Diversity2▲ 13×3 topics
- Film Industry2▲ 109×1 topic
- Memory Studies2▲ 45×2 topics
- Community Engagement2▲ 8.1×4 topics
- Gender Roles2▲ 23×3 topics
Which research topics does Consortium of Universities for Global Health publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts, Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, Semiotics and Representation Studies and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 8 works
- 2 Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophy 7 works
- 3 Semiotics and Representation Studies Literature and Literary Theory 7 works
- 4 Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education Philosophy 3 works
- 5 Cinema and Media Studies Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 6 Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies Cultural Studies 2 works
- 7 Diverse multidisciplinary academic research Cultural Studies 2 works
- 8 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 9 Climate Change and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2 works
- 10 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Consortium of Universities for Global Health's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 17% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Washington
- Georgetown University
- George Washington University
- United States Naval Research Laboratory
- Agricultural Research Service
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- United States Department of Agriculture
- American University
- Environmental Protection Agency
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.