Digital Catapult
In research, Digital Catapult stands highest in Social Sciences (#3,924 of 16,945 worldwide), Social Sciences (#2,916 of 10,206 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#14,873 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #14,120 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #768 of 2,253
- Research works
- 749 ▼ 20% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 16k 21.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 14.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 27% world 28%
What is Digital Catapult known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #3,924 of 16,945 | 35.7% | 384 | |
| Social SciencesField | #2,916 of 10,206 | 42.2% | 216 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #14,873 of 21,541 | 18.4% | 129 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #17,396 of 20,462 | 11.6% | 163 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Digital Catapult sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 4.5×
- Social Sciences 2.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.5×
- Neuroscience 1.4×
- Health Professions 1.3×
- Psychology 1.0×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Computer Science 0.9×
- Engineering 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Decision Sciences 0.5×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Nursing 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Digital Catapult?
Ranked on the composite score, Steve Chibnall lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Digital Catapult.
- 1 Steve Chibnall United Kingdom · #652,116 worldwide 0 citations · 23 works
Which keywords describe research at Digital Catapult?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Neoliberalism, Identity, Ethics, Glaucoma, Cultural Studies, Optical Coherence Tomography and Optic Nerve.
- Geography
- Dog Domestication
- Art Therapy
- 1960s
- Refractive Error
- Embodiment
- Macular Degeneration
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Myopia
- Religion
- Marxism
- Capitalism
- Optical Coherence Tomography
- History
- Cultural Studies
- Social Media
- Quality of Life
- Ethics
- Machine Learning
- Neoliberalism
- Globalization
- Identity
- Deep Learning
- Glaucoma
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Human Rights
- Optic Nerve
- Emotion
- Gender
- Neuroscience
- Intraocular Pressure
- Precision Medicine
- In Vivo Imaging
- Texture Analysis
- Quantitative Analysis
- Visual Impairment
- Affect
- Clothing
- Fashion
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization5▲ 4.5×11 topics
- Neoliberalism4▲ 18×6 topics
- Identity3▲ 7.1×6 topics
- Machine Learning3▲ 1.58×11 topics
- Deep Learning3▲ 1.36×13 topics
- Ethics3▲ 9.2×4 topics
- Glaucoma2▲ 27×3 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 2.8×11 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 2.5×6 topics
- Social Media2▲ 2.6×4 topics
- Public Health2▲ 2.5×8 topics
- Cultural Studies2▲ 9.1×3 topics
- Human Rights2▲ 3.2×5 topics
- History2▲ 4.2×5 topics
- Optic Nerve2▲ 29×2 topics
- Optical Coherence Tomography2▲ 29×3 topics
- Emotion2▲ 13×5 topics
- Capitalism2▲ 39×1 topic
- Gender2▲ 4.8×3 topics
- Marxism2▲ 60×1 topic
- Neuroscience2▲ 8.7×4 topics
- Religion2▲ 5.3×5 topics
- Intraocular Pressure1▲ 27×2 topics
- Myopia1▲ 39×2 topics
- Precision Medicine1▲ 4.9×3 topics
- Diabetic Retinopathy1▲ 21×2 topics
- In Vivo Imaging1▲ 23×2 topics
- Macular Degeneration1▲ 17×2 topics
- Texture Analysis1▲ 8.7×2 topics
- Embodiment1▲ 10×2 topics
- Quantitative Analysis1▲ 9.2×2 topics
- Refractive Error1▲ 49×1 topic
- Visual Impairment1▲ 39×1 topic
- 1960s1▲ 160×1 topic
- Affect1▲ 45×1 topic
- Art Therapy1▲ 124×1 topic
- Clothing1▲ 87×1 topic
- Dog Domestication1▲ 73×1 topic
- Fashion1▲ 42×1 topic
- Geography1▲ 52×1 topic
Which research topics does Digital Catapult publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Political Economy and Marxism, Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies, Geographies of human-animal interactions and Art Therapy and Mental Health.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Political Economy and Marxism Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 2 Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies Epidemiology 1 works
- 3 Geographies of human-animal interactions Geography, Planning and Development 1 works
- 4 Art Therapy and Mental Health Conservation 1 works
- 5 Human-Animal Interaction Studies Genetics 1 works
- 6 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 7 Glaucoma and retinal disorders Ophthalmology 1 works
- 8 Communism, Protests, Social Movements Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 9 Fashion and Cultural Textiles Museology 1 works
- 10 Media, Religion, Digital Communication Philosophy 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Digital Catapult's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 20% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.