Early Manuscripts Electronic Library
In research, Early Manuscripts Electronic Library stands highest in Health Sciences (#13,942 of 20,462 worldwide) and Medicine (#15,118 of 17,978 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #26,660 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #5,717 of 8,685
- Research works
- 353 ◆ 0% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 5.4k 15.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 38% world 28%
What is Early Manuscripts Electronic Library known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #13,942 of 20,462 | 15.2% | 156 | |
| MedicineField | #15,118 of 17,978 | 14.5% | 130 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Early Manuscripts Electronic Library sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 3.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 3.0×
- Veterinary 3.0×
- Nursing 2.9×
- Health Professions 2.7×
- Medicine 2.2×
- Neuroscience 1.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.2×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.7×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Psychology 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
Which keywords describe research at Early Manuscripts Electronic Library?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Religion, History, Quality of Life, Literature, Social Support, Metabolic Syndrome, End-of-Life Care and Epidemiology.
- Renaissance Florence
- Coping
- Public Health
- Genomics
- Cancer
- Antioxidant
- Identity
- Health
- Cultural Heritage
- Risk Factors
- Insulin Resistance
- Depression
- Guidelines
- Mental Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Oxidative Stress
- Metabolic Syndrome
- History
- Quality of Life
- Epidemiology
- Inflammation
- Religion
- Literature
- Social Support
- Climate Change
- Complications
- Mortality
- End-of-Life Care
- Invasive Species
- Clinical Trials
- Global Burden
- Healthcare
- Well-being
- Biological Control
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Treatment
- Italian Renaissance
- Spirituality
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 39 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology3▲ 1.40×30 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Inflammation2▲ 2.0×22 topics
- History2▲ 5.7×7 topics
- Religion2▲ 8.1×5 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome2▲ 4.2×7 topics
- Literature2▲ 5.6×3 topics
- Oxidative Stress2▲ 1.88×14 topics
- Social Support2▲ 5.5×4 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 2.6×9 topics
- Climate Change2◆ 1.07×5 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 2.0×8 topics
- Complications1▲ 5.1×7 topics
- Guidelines1▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Mortality1▲ 4.4×6 topics
- Depression1▲ 2.7×9 topics
- End-of-Life Care1▲ 20×2 topics
- Insulin Resistance1▲ 5.0×2 topics
- Invasive Species1▲ 5.7×2 topics
- Risk Factors1▲ 2.2×8 topics
- Clinical Trials1▲ 3.2×6 topics
- Cultural Heritage1▲ 3.9×4 topics
- Global Burden1▲ 4.1×7 topics
- Health1▲ 5.3×2 topics
- Healthcare1▲ 1.91×5 topics
- Identity1▲ 2.9×3 topics
- Well-being1▲ 5.6×2 topics
- Antioxidant1▲ 2.9×9 topics
- Biological Control1▲ 13×2 topics
- Cancer1▲ 1.45×8 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines1▲ 3.6×6 topics
- Genomics1▲ 6.5×4 topics
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma1▲ 9.8×2 topics
- Public Health1▲ 1.38×10 topics
- Treatment1▲ 1.63×8 topics
- Coping1▲ 37×1 topic
- Italian Renaissance1▲ 202×1 topic
- Renaissance Florence1▲ 202×1 topic
- Spirituality1▲ 19×1 topic
Which research topics does Early Manuscripts Electronic Library publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Renaissance and Early Modern Studies, Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology, Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment and Hemiptera Insect Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Renaissance and Early Modern Studies History 1 works
- 2 Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Health 1 works
- 3 Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 1 works
- 4 Hemiptera Insect Studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
- 5 Forest Insect Ecology and Management Ecology 1 works
- 6 Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 7 Health Sciences Research and Education General Health Professions 1 works
- 8 Liver Disease and Transplantation Hepatology 1 works
- 9 Media and Digital Communication Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
- 10 Ovarian function and disorders Reproductive Medicine 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Early Manuscripts Electronic Library's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 0% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Rolling Hills Estates
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.