Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Billerica · United States

Exogenesis (United States)

exogenesis.usROR OpenAlex
Research works
14
▼ 47% vs 2018-21
Citations
197
14.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
15%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%
Exogenesis (United States)

Not ranked overall: Exogenesis (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Exogenesis (United States) work in?

In all years, 86% of research at Exogenesis (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 12% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (62%), Materials Science (20%), Medicine (11%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 12 fractional works · 85.7% of its workEngineering: 9 fractional works · 62.5% of its workComputational Mechanics: 4 fractional works · 27.0% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 16.7% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 10.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 8.6% of its workMaterials Science: 3 fractional works · 19.5% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 2 fractional works · 12.2% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 11.8% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 10.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 4.5% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workALL ITS WORKExogenesis(United States)14fractional works, all years
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences86%Health Sciences12%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering962.5%
    2. Materials Science319.5%
    3. Chemistry02.4%
    4. Physics and Astronomy01.2%
    1. Medicine110.6%
    2. Dentistry01.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.2%
    2. Neuroscience01.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Exogenesis (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Sean R. Kirkpatrick lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Exogenesis (United States).

  1. 1 Sean R. Kirkpatrick United States · #3,462,507 worldwide 183 citations · 19 works
All ranked researchers at Exogenesis (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Exogenesis (United States)?

The most cited paper from Exogenesis (United States) is "Neutral atom beam technique enhances bioactivity of PEEK" (Joseph T. Khoury, Sean R. Kirkpatrick, Melissa Maxwell et al., 2013), with 56 citations. Next come "Enhanced bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK with accelerated neutral atom beam technology" (55) and "Surface bioactivation of PEEK by neutral atom beam technology" (52).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Neutral atom beam technique enhances bioactivity of PEEK Joseph T. Khoury, Sean R. Kirkpatrick, Melissa Maxwell et al. · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 24 Jan 2013 56
2 Enhanced bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK with accelerated neutral atom beam technology Joseph T. Khoury, Melissa Maxwell, Raymond E. Cherian et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 23 Nov 2015 55
3 Surface bioactivation of PEEK by neutral atom beam technology Joseph T. Khoury, Irina I. Selezneva, S. Pestov et al. · Bioactive Materials Open access 23 Feb 2019 52
4 Investigation of accelerated neutral atom beams created from gas cluster ion beams A. R. Kirkpatrick, Sean R. Kirkpatrick, Mathieu Walsh et al. · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 29 Jan 2013 46
5 Augmenting the bioactivity of polyetheretherketone using a novel accelerated neutral atom beam technique Sara Ajami, MJ Coathup, Joseph T. Khoury et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 18 Apr 2016 30
All 21 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Exogenesis (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials, Polymer Surface Interaction Studies, Dental materials and restorations and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty.

Bone Tissue Engineering …0Bone Tissue Engineering Materials: 0 fractional worksPolymer Surface Interact…0Polymer Surface Interaction Studies: 0 fractional worksDental materials and res…0Dental materials and restorations: 0 fractional worksOrthopaedic implants and…0Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty: 0 fractional worksOrthopedic Infections an…0Orthopedic Infections and Treatments: 0 fractional works
Biomedical EngineeringSurfaces, Coatings and FilmsOrthodonticsSurgery

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Bone Tissue Engineering Materials Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  2. 2 Polymer Surface Interaction Studies Surfaces, Coatings and Films 0 works
  3. 3 Dental materials and restorations Orthodontics 0 works
  4. 4 Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Surgery 0 works
  5. 5 Orthopedic Infections and Treatments Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available14.9%not open85.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors24.7%domestic only75.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Exogenesis (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 47% lower than in 2018-2021.

2005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Exogenesis (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000096% in 2022.

0.000025%0.000050%0.000075%Exogenesis (United States)0.0000046% in 202320102020

Fractional works of Exogenesis (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Billerica

All research institutions in Billerica

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Exogenesis (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.