- Research works
- 73 ▼ 60% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 432 6.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 16.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Hesburgh Libraries is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 11.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 11.6×
- Arts and Humanities 3.9×
- Computer Science 2.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.3×
- Health Professions 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Hesburgh Libraries?
Ranked on the composite score, Laura A. Sill lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Hesburgh Libraries.
- 1 Laura A. Sill United States · #607,922 worldwide 6 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Hesburgh Libraries?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Academic Libraries, Educational Technology, Digital Textbooks, E-Books, Digital Repositories, Linked Data, Semantic Web and Bibliographic Framework.
- Data Sharing
- Distributed Storage
- Student Satisfaction
- Information Retrieval
- Online Learning
- Blended Learning
- Archives
- Literary History
- Digital Humanities
- Diversity
- Web 2.0
- Technology Integration
- Information Behavior
- Social Media
- Information Literacy
- User-Centered Design
- Bibliographic Framework
- Linked Data
- E-Books
- Educational Technology
- Academic Libraries
- Digital Textbooks
- Digital Repositories
- Semantic Web
- Resource Description and Access
- Critical Thinking
- Online Research
- Digital Literacy
- User Engagement
- Library 2.0
- Digital Divide
- Social Network Analysis
- Library Services
- Social Inclusion
- Digital Preservation
- E-Learning
- Cognitive Engagement
- Distance Education
- Collaboration
- Network Coding
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Academic Libraries21▲ 619×3 topics
- Educational Technology11▲ 23×3 topics
- Digital Textbooks10▲ 1178×1 topic
- E-Books10▲ 1178×1 topic
- Digital Repositories9▲ 476×2 topics
- Linked Data8▲ 147×2 topics
- Semantic Web8▲ 77×2 topics
- Bibliographic Framework8▲ 1109×1 topic
- Resource Description and Access8▲ 1109×1 topic
- User-Centered Design6▲ 240×3 topics
- Critical Thinking6▲ 119×3 topics
- Information Literacy6▲ 64×2 topics
- Online Research6▲ 271×2 topics
- Social Media6▲ 10×4 topics
- Digital Literacy6▲ 26×1 topic
- Information Behavior6▲ 493×1 topic
- User Engagement5▲ 169×2 topics
- Technology Integration5▲ 35×2 topics
- Library 2.05▲ 363×1 topic
- Web 2.05▲ 363×1 topic
- Digital Divide4▲ 30×3 topics
- Diversity4▲ 32×3 topics
- Social Network Analysis4▲ 43×3 topics
- Digital Humanities4▲ 403×1 topic
- Library Services4▲ 313×1 topic
- Literary History4▲ 151×1 topic
- Social Inclusion4▲ 145×1 topic
- Archives3▲ 314×1 topic
- Digital Preservation3▲ 270×1 topic
- Blended Learning2▲ 26×2 topics
- E-Learning2▲ 3.9×2 topics
- Online Learning2▲ 5.0×2 topics
- Cognitive Engagement1▲ 26×2 topics
- Information Retrieval1▲ 14×4 topics
- Distance Education1▲ 13×1 topic
- Student Satisfaction1▲ 15×1 topic
- Collaboration1▲ 22×3 topics
- Distributed Storage1▲ 34×1 topic
- Network Coding1▲ 17×1 topic
- Data Sharing1▲ 69×1 topic
Which research topics does Hesburgh Libraries publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Library Science and Information Systems, Library Science and Administration, Digital Humanities and Scholarship and scientometrics and bibliometrics research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 1 works
- 2 Library Science and Administration Library and Information Sciences 1 works
- 3 Digital Humanities and Scholarship Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
- 4 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
- 5 Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
- 6 Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Archeology 0 works
- 7 Political Conflict and Governance Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 8 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 9 Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 10 Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence Strategy and Management 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Hesburgh Libraries's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 60% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Notre Dame
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.