Institution · Hindawi (United Kingdom)
Most cited papers from Hindawi (United Kingdom)
What are the most cited papers from Hindawi (United Kingdom)?
The most cited paper from Hindawi (United Kingdom) is "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research" (Nathalie Percie du Sert et al., 2020), with 6,005 citations. Next come "Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0" (2,875) and "The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research" (1,053).
Showing 29 of 29 papers. Every paper is listed.
| # | Paper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · PLoS Biology | 14 Jul 2020 | 6,005 |
| 2 | Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · PLoS Biology | 14 Jul 2020 | 2,875 |
| 3 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) | 15 Jul 2019 | 1,053 |
| 4 | Predatory journals: no definition, no defence Agnes Grudniewicz et al. · Nature | 11 Dec 2019 | 732 |
| 5 | Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019 Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) | 15 Jul 2019 | 564 |
| 6 | The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal researchThe ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · BMJ Open Science | Jul 2020 | 278 |
| 7 | Recognizing the value of software: a software citation guide Daniel S. Katz et al. · F1000Research | 12 Jan 2021 | 67 |
| 8 | Unlock ways to share data on peer review Flaminio Squazzoni et al. · Nature | 25 Feb 2020 | 57 |
| 9 | Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. · BMJ Open Science | Jun 2018 | 48 |
| 10 | The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal Barbara C. McGillivray, Mathias Astell · Scientometrics | 14 Sep 2019 | 26 |
| 11 | Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science Michele Avissar-Whiting et al. · PLoS Biology | 29 Feb 2024 | 24 |
| 12 | Going all the way: how Hindawi became an open access publisher Paul Evan Peters · Learned Publishing | 20 Jun 2007 | 22 |
| 13 | The importance of software citation Daniel S. Katz et al. · F1000Research | 19 Oct 2020 | 15 |
| 14 | Data Repository Selection: Criteria That Matter Susanna‐Assunta Sansone et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) | 13 Oct 2020 | 10 |
| 15 | Journal Production Guidance for Software and Data Citations Shelley Stall et al. | 31 Dec 2022 | 4 |
| 16 | Repository Features to Help Researchers: An invitation to a dialogue Cannon, Matthew et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) | 14 Apr 2021 | 1 |
| 17 | The Role of Nursing in Community Participation in Health Facilities Shareefa.A.Tohari, Hamed.S.Alsharef, Mohammed Alghamdi et al. · Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture | 30 Sep 2024 | 0 |
| 18 | The Effect Of Fungi On Human Health Abdulrahman.J. Alkhubrani, Rahaf.A. Alzaidi, Nadin.G. Albarakati et al. · Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences | 2023 | 0 |
| 19 | State of Open Access in Africa and its Implication on Researchers [Webinar] Matt J Hodgkinson, Elizabeth Marincola, Osman Aldirdiri et al. | 24 Jun 2020 | 0 |
| 20 | Report from the Peer Review Workgroup Bev Acreman, Peter Berkery, Caroline Black et al. · Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings | 19 Apr 2016 | 0 |
| 21 | Peer Review Bev Acreman, Peter Berkery, Caroline Black et al. · Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings | 22 Apr 2016 | 0 |
| 22 | Heterogeneous population A. Al-Hindawi, D. Whittaker, T. Spruell et al. · British Journal of Anaesthesia | 20 Jul 2016 | 0 |
| 23 | Introducing the Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) Helen Duce, Ginny Hendricks, Bianca M. R. Kramer et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) | 24 Sep 2020 | 0 |
| 24 | A Software Citation Primer Daniel S. Katz et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) | 9 Nov 2020 | 0 |
| 25 | Changing Culture Through Credit in Support of Enabling FAIR Data I Denise J. Hills, Shelley Stall, Rowena Davis et al. · AGU Fall Meeting 2018 | 11 Dec 2018 | 0 |
| 26 | Being an Open Access Publisher Paul Evan Peters, Erik Lieungh · Open Science Talk | 4 Feb 2020 | 0 |
| 27 | Ensuring a Healthy and Competitive Market for Open Access Publishing Paul Evan Peters · Septentrio Conference Series | 20 Nov 2018 | 0 |
| 28 | Open Source Platforms as a Foundation for Open Science Andrew Smeall · Septentrio Conference Series | 20 Nov 2018 | 0 |
| 29 | Rogue Solutions & New Open Resources Workgroup Report Bryan Alexander, Lars Bjørnshauge, Hillary Corbett et al. · Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings | 5 Nov 2017 | 0 |
Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.