Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Funder · Missoula · United States

Humanities Montana

humanitiesmontana.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
6
▼ 100% vs 2018-21
Citations
29
4.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
1.6%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
33%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%
Humanities Montana

Not ranked overall: Humanities Montana is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Humanities Montana work in?

In all years, 40% of research at Humanities Montana is in Social Sciences, 33% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (18%), Social Sciences (17%), Health Professions (16%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 2 fractional works · 40.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 16.5% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 8.5% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 12.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 8.5% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 11.1% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 33.3% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 17.8% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 15.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 15.5% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 16.5% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 5.8% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 4.5% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 7.1% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workALL ITS WORKHumanitiesMontana6fractional works, all years
Life Sciences17%Physical Sciences10%Health Sciences33%Social Sciences40%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 11 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences116.5%
    2. Psychology112.5%
    3. Arts and Humanities111.1%
    1. Medicine117.8%
    2. Health Professions115.5%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences05.8%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology04.5%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics03.5%
    4. Neuroscience02.7%
    1. Environmental Science07.1%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences03.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    What are the most cited papers from Humanities Montana?

    The most cited paper from Humanities Montana is "Prevention of infection in the immunocompromised host" (George Risi, Vicki Tomascak, 1998), with 29 citations. Next come "Natural Life: Thoreau's Worldly Transcendentalism" (20) and "Telehealth During COVID-19: Suicide Prevention and American Indian Communities in Montana" (18).

    Most cited papers
    #PaperReleasedCitations
    1 Prevention of infection in the immunocompromised host George Risi, Vicki Tomascak · American Journal of Infection Control Open access Dec 1998 29
    2 Natural Life: Thoreau's Worldly Transcendentalism Daniel Ari Mendelson · ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment Jul 2005 20
    3 Telehealth During COVID-19: Suicide Prevention and American Indian Communities in Montana Zachary Pruitt, Kate P. Chapin, Haley Eakin et al. · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health Open access 4 Jun 2021 18
    4 Ancient mitochondrial DNA and ancestry of Paquimé inhabitants, Casas Grandes (A.D. 1200–1450) Ana Y. Morales‐Arce, Meradeth H. Snow, Jane H. Kelley et al. · American Journal of Physical Anthropology 6 Apr 2017 14
    5 Empathic accuracy and cognitions during conflict: An in‐depth analysis of understanding scores Céline Hinnekens, ALAN L. SILLARS, Lesley Verhofstadt et al. · Personal Relationships Open access Mar 2020 11
    All 19 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which research topics does Humanities Montana publish most on?

    By volume: Ethics in medical practice, Archaeology and Natural History, Historical Medical Research and Treatments and American Environmental and Regional History.

    Ethics in medical practice1Ethics in medical practice: 1 fractional worksArchaeology and Natural History: 0 fractional worksHistorical Medical Research and Treatments: 0 fractional worksAmerican Environmental and Regional History: 0 fractional worksMedical History and Innovations: 0 fractional worksHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices: 0 fractional worksWorkplace Health and Wel…0Workplace Health and Well-being: 0 fractional worksRetirement, Disability, …0Retirement, Disability, and Employment: 0 fractional worksPain Management and Plac…0Pain Management and Placebo Effect: 0 fractional worksPharmaceutical industry …0Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare: 0 fractional works
    General Health ProfessionsAnthropologyRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law5 others

    Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

    1. 1 Ethics in medical practice General Health Professions 1 works
    2. 2 Archaeology and Natural History Anthropology 0 works
    3. 3 Historical Medical Research and Treatments Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
    4. 4 American Environmental and Regional History Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
    5. 5 Medical History and Innovations History 0 works
    6. 6 Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices Clinical Psychology 0 works
    7. 7 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works
    8. 8 Retirement, Disability, and Employment Demography 0 works
    9. 9 Pain Management and Placebo Effect Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
    10. 10 Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare Pharmacology 0 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available33.3%not open66.7%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    with international co-authors9.3%domestic only90.7%

    World: 18% is written across borders.

    How has Humanities Montana's research output changed?

    Output in 2022-2025 was 100% lower than in 2018-2021.

    199520002005201020152020
    grewheldshrank

    The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

    Its share of all research

    Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Humanities Montana as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000010% in 2020.

    0.000020%0.000040%0.000060%Humanities Montana0.0000064% in 2021200020102020

    Fractional works of Humanities Montana over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

    Other research institutions in Missoula

    All research institutions in Missoula

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Humanities Montana. Posts are plain text and can be reported.