Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Institution · IDEAconsult

Most cited papers from IDEAconsult

What are the most cited papers from IDEAconsult?

The most cited paper from IDEAconsult is "The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) v2.0: atom typing, depiction, molecular formulas, and substructure searching" (Egon Willighagen, John W. Mayfield, Jonathan Alvarsson et al., 2017), with 597 citations. Next come "An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software" (516) and "ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics" (252).

Showing 50 of 60 papers. Every paper with more than 9 citations is listed.

Most cited papers, sortable by citations and release date
#Paper
1 The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) v2.0: atom typing, depiction, molecular formulas, and substructure searching Egon Willighagen, John W. Mayfield, Jonathan Alvarsson et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 6 Jun 2017 597
2 An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software Grace Y. Patlewicz, Nina Jeliazkova, R.J. Safford et al. · SAR and QSAR in environmental research Jul 2008 516
3 ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics Jiangming Sun, Nina Jeliazkova, Vladimir Chupakhin et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 7 Mar 2017 252
4 CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity Kamel Mansouri et al. · Environmental Health Perspectives Open access Feb 2020 218
5 A framework for grouping and read-across of nanomaterials- supporting innovation and risk assessment Vicki Stone et al. · Nano Today Open access 8 Aug 2020 152
6 Improvement of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project Masamitsu Honma et al. · Mutagenesis Open access 20 Sep 2018 149
7 The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information Nina Jeliazkova, Charalampos Chomenidis, Philip Doganis et al. · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology Open access 27 Jul 2015 146
8 Towards FAIR nanosafety data Nina Jeliazkova et al. · Nature Nanotechnology Open access 20 May 2021 122
9 Collaborative development of predictive toxicology applications Barry J. Hardy et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 31 Aug 2010 110
10 eNanoMapper: harnessing ontologies to enable data integration for nanomaterial risk assessment Janna Hastings, Nina Jeliazkova, Gareth Owen et al. · Journal of Biomedical Semantics Open access 20 Mar 2015 108
11 Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards in chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on Noel M. O’Boyle et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 14 Oct 2011 96
12 Representing and describing nanomaterials in predictive nanoinformatics Ewelina Wyrzykowska, Alicja Mikołajczyk, Iseult Lynch et al. · Nature Nanotechnology Open access 18 Aug 2022 88
13 Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations Sandra C. Karcher, Egon Willighagen, John Rumble et al. · NanoImpact Open access 11 Nov 2017 84
14 AMBIT RESTful web services: an implementation of the OpenTox application programming interface Nina Jeliazkova, Vedrin Jeliazkov · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 16 May 2011 83
15 GLORY: Generator of the Structures of Likely Cytochrome P450 Metabolites Based on Predicted Sites of Metabolism Christina de Bruyn Kops, Conrad Stork, Martin Šícho et al. · Frontiers in Chemistry Open access 12 Jun 2019 81
16 Making use of available and emerging data to predict the hazards of engineered nanomaterials by means of in silico tools: A critical review Gianpietro Basei, Danail Rumenov Hristozov, Lara Lamon et al. · NanoImpact Open access 2019 76
17 Toxmatch–a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups Grace Y. Patlewicz, Nina Jeliazkova, A. Gallegos Saliner et al. · SAR and QSAR in environmental research Apr 2008 70
18 A Data Fusion Pipeline for Generating and Enriching Adverse Outcome Pathway Descriptions Penny E. H. Nymark, Linda Rieswijk, Friederike Ehrhart et al. · Toxicological Sciences Open access 14 Nov 2017 62
19 Industry-scale application and evaluation of deep learning for drug target prediction Noé Sturm, Andreas Mayr, Thanh Le Van et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 19 Apr 2020 60
20 A computational view on nanomaterial intrinsic and extrinsic features for nanosafety and sustainability Giulia Mancardi et al. · Materials Today Open access 20 Jun 2023 58
21 How can we justify grouping of nanoforms for hazard assessment? Concepts and tools to quantify similarity Nina Jeliazkova, Eric A.J. Bleeker, Richard Kynaston Cross et al. · NanoImpact Open access 19 Nov 2021 57
22 Ambit‐Tautomer: An Open Source Tool for Tautomer Generation Nikolay T. Kochev, Vesselina Paskaleva, Nina Jeliazkova · Molecular Informatics Jun 2013 50
23 Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report Shareen Heather Doak, C Andreoli, Michael J. Burgum et al. · Mutagenesis Open access 26 May 2023 49
24 Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterials Panagiotis Isigonis et al. · Small Open access 23 Jul 2020 48
25 The ToxBank Data Warehouse: Supporting the Replacement of In Vivo Repeated Dose Systemic Toxicity Testing Pekka J. Kohonen, Emilio Benfenati, David Bower et al. · Molecular Informatics Open access 2013 44
26 Insights into possibilities for grouping and read-across for nanomaterials in EU chemicals legislation Agnieszka Mech et al. · Nanotoxicology Open access 5 Sep 2018 43
27 CADASTER QSPR Models for Predictions of Melting and Boiling Points of Perfluorinated Chemicals Barun Bhhatarai, Wolfram Teetz, Tao Liu et al. · Molecular Informatics 14 Mar 2011 41
28 Toxmatch—A chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures Ana Gallegos, Albert Poater, Nina Jeliazkova et al. · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Jun 2008 40
29 Your Spreadsheets Can Be FAIR: A Tool and FAIRification Workflow for the eNanoMapper Database Nikolay T. Kochev, Nina Jeliazkova, Vesselina Paskaleva et al. · Nanomaterials Open access 24 Sep 2020 39
30 Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology Tomasz Puzyn, Nina Jeliazkova, Haralambos Sarimveis et al. · Food and Chemical Toxicology Open access 21 Sep 2017 38
31 AMBIT‐SMARTS: Efficient Searching of Chemical Structures and Fragments Nina Jeliazkova, Nikolay T. Kochev · Molecular Informatics Aug 2011 35
32 Artificial Intelligence-Powered Raman Spectroscopy through Open Science and FAIR Principles Nicolás Coca-López, Víctor Alcolea-Rodriguez, Miguel Á. Bañares et al. · ACS Nano Open access 27 Oct 2025 33
33 OpenTox predictive toxicology framework: toxicological ontology and semantic media wiki-based OpenToxipedia Olga Tcheremenskaia, Romualdo Benigni, Ivelina Nikolova et al. · Journal of Biomedical Semantics Open access 24 Apr 2012 33
34 Applicability Domain Dependent Predictive Uncertainty in QSAR Regressions Ullrika Sahlin, Nina Jeliazkova, Tomas Öberg · Molecular Informatics 7 Oct 2013 33
35 From principles to reality. FAIR implementation in the nanosafety community Verónica I. Dumit et al. · Nano Today Open access 30 Jun 2023 28
36 European Registry of Materials: global, unique identifiers for (undisclosed) nanomaterials Jeaphianne van Rijn, Antreas Afantitis, Mustafa Melih Culha et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 24 Aug 2022 27
37 Ambit-SMIRKS: a software module for reaction representation, reaction search and structure transformation Nikolay T. Kochev, Svetlana Avramova, Nina Jeliazkova · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 20 Aug 2018 27
38 Computational toxicology using the OpenTox application programming interface and Bioclipse Egon Willighagen, Nina Jeliazkova, Barry J. Hardy et al. · BMC Research Notes Open access 10 Nov 2011 27
39 Harmonising knowledge for safer materials via the “NanoCommons” Knowledge Base Dieter Maier et al. · Frontiers in Physics Open access 13 Nov 2023 26
40 Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project A. Furuhama et al. · SAR and QSAR in environmental research Open access 2 Dec 2023 25
41 A template wizard for the cocreation of machine-readable data-reporting to harmonize the evaluation of (nano)materials Nina Jeliazkova et al. · Nature Protocols Open access 16 May 2024 21
42 Governance of advanced materials: Shaping a safe and sustainable future Monique Groenewold et al. · NanoImpact Open access 29 May 2024 20
43 A methodology for the automatic evaluation of data quality and completeness of nanomaterials for risk assessment purposes Gianpietro Basei, Hubert Rauscher, Nina Jeliazkova et al. · Nanotoxicology Open access 7 Feb 2022 15
44 Evaluation of CADASTER QSAR Models for the Aquatic Toxicity of (Benzo)triazoles and Prioritisation by Consensus Prediction Stefano Cassani, Simona Kovarich, Ester Papa et al. · Alternatives to Laboratory Animals Open access Mar 2013 15
45 XMetDB: an open access database for xenobiotic metabolism Ola Spjuth, Patrik Rydberg, Egon Willighagen et al. · Journal of Cheminformatics Open access 15 Sep 2016 14
46 The QSPR-THESAURUS: The Online Platform of the CADASTER Project Stefan Brandmaier et al. · Alternatives to Laboratory Animals Open access Mar 2014 13
47 Structural motifs modulating the carcinogenic risk of aromatic amines Romualdo Benigni, Andrew Paul Worth, Tatiana I. Netzeva et al. · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 16 Jan 2009 13
48 Reliable Platform for Enhanced Living Environment Rossitza Goleva, Rumen Stainov, Alexander Savov et al. · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering Conference paper 2015 13
49 Possibilities to group nanomaterials across different substances – A case study on organic pigments Nina Jeliazkova, Lan Ma‐Hock, Gemma Janer et al. · NanoImpact Open access 12 Feb 2022 12
50 Bayesian based similarity assessment of nanomaterials to inform grouping Georgia Tsiliki, Didem Ag Seleci, Alex Zabeo et al. · NanoImpact Open access 2022 12

Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.