Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Budapest · Hungary

Institute for Literary Studies

In research, Institute for Literary Studies stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,457 of 10,521 worldwide), Social Sciences (#4,888 of 6,365 worldwide) and Geography, Planning and Development (#81 of 99 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Geography, Planning and Development, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory — Geography, Planning and Development is 181.2× its share of world research.

iti.mta.hu/index-eng.htmlROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#18,877
of 28,054 · #29,619 all time
Rank in Hungary
#74
of 118
Research works
1.9k
▲ 57% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.8k
1.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.5%
record average 16.5%
Open access
54%
world 28%

What is Institute for Literary Studies known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #6,457 of 10,521 4.7%509 #7685
Social SciencesField #4,888 of 6,365 2.8%352 #6158
Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSubfield #81 of 99 1.5%210 #244
Arts and HumanitiesField #1,660 of 1,998 10.0%132 #2308

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for Literary Studies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Social Sciences#7,685 #6,457
  2. Social Sciences#6,158 #4,888
  3. Geography, Planning and Development#244 #81
  4. Arts and Humanities#2,308 #1,660
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Institute for Literary Studies specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Geography, Planning and Development takes 181.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSubfield · 210.2 works181×
  2. Language and LinguisticsSubfield · 41.0 works17×
  3. Literature and Literary TheorySubfield · 43.2 works14×
  4. Arts and HumanitiesField · 131.9 works8.1×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 5 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.03× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.16× its world share, 2 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.41× its world share, 18 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.38× its world share, 3 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.19× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.05× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.14× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.80× its world share, 12 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.05× its world share, 5 worksMedicineNursing: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 8.07× its world share, 132 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.10× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.30× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.38× its world share, 5 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.99× its world share, 17 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.92× its world share, 352 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 8.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Institute for Literary Studies?

Ranked on the composite score, Clive T. Probyn, Anna Tüskés and Jennifer Strauss lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Literary Studies.

  1. 1 Clive T. Probyn Hungary · #119,226 worldwide 90 citations · 27 works
  2. 2 Anna Tüskés Hungary · #359,820 worldwide 0 citations · 40 works
  3. 3 Jennifer Strauss Hungary · #394,671 worldwide 27 citations · 23 works
  4. 4 Patrick Spedding Hungary · #409,406 worldwide 1 citations · 52 works
  5. 5 Michael Ackland Hungary · #578,762 worldwide 2 citations · 22 works
  6. 6 Robin Gerster Hungary · #580,556 worldwide 9 citations · 34 works
  7. 7 Sue Kossew Hungary · #619,270 worldwide 10 citations · 21 works
  8. 8 Alan Frank Dilnot Hungary · #875,528 worldwide 1 citations · 15 works
  9. 9 Tara McDowell Hungary · #917,302 worldwide 2 citations · 15 works
  10. 10 Melinda Harvey Hungary · #1,000,086 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Institute for Literary Studies

Which keywords describe research at Institute for Literary Studies?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Sustainability, Innovation, Economic Development, Social Impact, Regional Disparities, Tourism and Policy.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization244▲ 22×37 topics
  2. Sustainability216▲ 16×17 topics
  3. Economic Development212▲ 46×7 topics
  4. Innovation212▲ 36×10 topics
  5. Social Impact212▲ 94×4 topics
  6. Regional Disparities211▲ 729×2 topics
  7. Tourism211▲ 391×2 topics
  8. Policy211▲ 170×4 topics
  9. Knowledge Management210▲ 67×3 topics
  10. Environmental Influence210▲ 1153×1 topic
  11. Identity35▲ 8.4×32 topics
  12. Literature30▲ 9.7×32 topics
  13. Nationalism25▲ 9.4×21 topics
  14. Cultural Identity22▲ 7.7×17 topics
  15. European Union22▲ 17×10 topics
  16. International Relations22▲ 16×8 topics
  17. Cold War20▲ 56×4 topics
  18. Eastern Europe20▲ 64×3 topics
  19. Soviet Union20▲ 61×3 topics
  20. Diplomacy20▲ 37×3 topics
  21. Cultural Integration20▲ 15×3 topics
  22. European Integration19▲ 60×3 topics
  23. Sociology19▲ 25×7 topics
  24. Corpus Linguistics19▲ 15×5 topics
  25. National Identity19▲ 29×5 topics
  26. Gender19▲ 6.1×26 topics
  27. Australia19▲ 194×1 topic
  28. Postcolonial Theory19▲ 123×1 topic
  29. Geopolitics18▲ 21×5 topics
  30. Cultural Diplomacy18▲ 38×3 topics
  31. Social History18▲ 38×5 topics
  32. Sustainable Development Goals17▲ 18×2 topics
  33. Soft Power17▲ 73×2 topics
  34. Central Europe16▲ 386×1 topic
  35. Visegrad Group16▲ 386×1 topic
  36. Sociolinguistics16▲ 14×6 topics
  37. Colonialism15▲ 5.6×26 topics
  38. Feminism15▲ 9.2×11 topics
  39. Cosmopolitanism13▲ 21×4 topics
  40. Empire12▲ 25×4 topics

Which research topics does Institute for Literary Studies publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies, Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics, Central European and Russian historical studies and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Hungarian Social, Econom…210Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies: 210 fractional worksHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics: 19 fractional worksCentral European and Russian historical studies: 16 fractional worksNatural Language Processing Techniques: 9 fractional worksCentral European national history: 9 fractional worksComparative and World Literature: 8 fractional worksTranslation Studies and Practices: 7 fractional worksLinguistics and language evolution: 7 fractional worksAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies: 7 fractional worksEuropean Cultural and National Identity: 7 fractional works
Geography, Planning and DevelopmentPolitical Science and International RelationsArtificial IntelligenceSociology and Political Science3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies Geography, Planning and Development 210 works
  2. 2 Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 19 works
  3. 3 Central European and Russian historical studies Political Science and International Relations 16 works
  4. 4 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 9 works
  5. 5 Central European national history Sociology and Political Science 9 works
  6. 6 Comparative and World Literature Literature and Literary Theory 8 works
  7. 7 Translation Studies and Practices Language and Linguistics 7 works
  8. 8 Linguistics and language evolution Language and Linguistics 7 works
  9. 9 Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies Archeology 7 works
  10. 10 European Cultural and National Identity Sociology and Political Science 7 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available53.8%not open46.2%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors6.6%domestic only93.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Institute for Literary Studies's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 57% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Budapest

All research institutions in Budapest

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.