Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Central European and Russian historical studies

Central European and Russian historical studies is a research topic within Political Science and International Relations. Science Explorer counts 4.7k research works in it since 1950. 6.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the geopolitical, sociological, and historical aspects of Central and Eastern Europe, with a focus on the Visegrad Group, migration policy, sustainable development goals, and the influence of cultural diplomacy and soft power. It delves into the complexities of national identity, historical legacies, and the role of Central Europe in contemporary geopolitics.

  • Central Europe
  • Visegrad Group
  • Geopolitics
  • Sociology
  • Cultural Diplomacy
  • Soft Power
  • Migration Policy
  • Historical Legacy
  • Sustainable Development Goals
  • National Identity
Research works
4.7k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
304
per year above
Top-10% rate
6.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+153%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Central European and Russian historical studies research?

By volume, Russia and Hungary publish the most (366 and 270 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Russia 366 works
  2. 2 Hungary 270 works
  3. 3 United States 134 works
  4. 4 Germany 131 works
  5. 5 Ukraine 115 works
  6. 6 Poland 92 works
  7. 7 Romania 56 works
  8. 8 Czechia 45 works
  9. 9 France 44 works
  10. 10 Austria 39 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Russia: 28.4%Hungary: 20.9%United States: 10.4%Germany: 10.1%6 others listed: 30.2%28%largest
Russia366 · 28.4%Hungary270 · 20.9%United States134 · 10.4%Germany131 · 10.1%6 others listed390 · 30.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Central European and Russian historical studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Ludovika University of Public Service publishes the most Central European and Russian historical studies research, followed by Eötvös Loránd University and University of Szeged.

Who are the leading researchers in Central European and Russian historical studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Central European and Russian historical studies include Barry Turner.

  1. 1 Barry Turner United Kingdom 638 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Central European and Russian historical studies research done?

The largest centres of Central European and Russian historical studies research in 2022–2025 are Budapest (Hungary), Moscow (Russia), Saint Petersburg (Russia) and Kyiv (Ukraine). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Budapest and Szeged.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Budapest Hungary 180 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 154 works
  3. 3 Saint Petersburg Russia 55 works
  4. 4 Kyiv Ukraine 43 works
  5. 5 Szeged Hungary 27 works
  6. 6 Vienna Austria 26 works
  7. 7 Prague Czechia 22 works
  8. 8 Weatherford United States 22 works
  9. 9 Warsaw Poland 20 works
  10. 10 Debrecen Hungary 20 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BudapestHU · 180.3 works60×
  2. SzegedHU · 26.7 works58×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Central European and Russian historical studies than the world average.

See Central European and Russian historical studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Central European and Russian historical studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Babeș-Bolyai University, University of Szeged and University of Pecs score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%5%10%15%mean 6.35%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Babeș-Bolyai University: 13, 11.3%University of Szeged: 25, 8.5%University of Pecs: 14, 9.5%Jagiellonian University: 11, 12.0%Eötvös Loránd University: 32, 6.3%Ludovika University of Public Service: 38, 5.3%Moscow State University: 13, 3.9%St Petersburg University: 13, 3.7%Weatherford College: 22, 3.0%University of Debrecen: 16, 0.0%Jagiellonian Univers…Babeș-Bolyai Univers…University of PecsUniversity of Szeged
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Babeș-Bolyai UniversityRomania 76.311.3%36.6×13 +550.0%
2 University of SzegedHungary 72.98.5%67.1×25 +118.6%
3 University of PecsHungary 72.39.5%45.5×14 +203.8%
4 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 69.112.0%10.4×11 +105.0%
5 Eötvös Loránd UniversityHungary 67.16.3%77.5×32 +56.0%
6 Ludovika University of Public ServiceHungary 64.55.3%221.8×38
7 Moscow State UniversityTajikistan 56.73.9%31.5×13
8 St Petersburg UniversityRussia 56.23.7%18.4×13 +189.3%
9 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 47.43.0%10.8×22 -35.7%
10 University of DebrecenHungary 42.80.0%37.5×16 +69.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Central European and Russian historical studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 153% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Central European and Russian historical studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.