Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Islamic Studies and History

Islamic Studies and History is a research topic within Political Science and International Relations. Science Explorer counts 38k research works in it since 1950. 10.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the politics of Islamic reform, including topics such as secularism, hermeneutics, empire, feminism, and gender equality in the context of the Middle East, with a focus on the Ottoman Empire and Iran. It delves into the complex interplay between religious traditions, modernity, and political dynamics in the region.

  • Islamic reform
  • Middle East
  • Ottoman Empire
  • Feminism
  • Iran
  • Secularism
  • Hermeneutics
  • Empire
  • Gender equality
  • Arab nationalism
Research works
38k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+15%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
Türkiye
23% of the 10 largest, 2022-now

Which countries lead Islamic Studies and History research?

By volume, Türkiye and the United States publish the most (1.6k and 1.5k works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Türkiye 1.6k works
  2. 2 United States 1.5k works
  3. 3 Indonesia 799 works
  4. 4 Pakistan 528 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 519 works
  6. 6 Iran 485 works
  7. 7 Iraq 477 works
  8. 8 France 328 works
  9. 9 Germany 298 works
  10. 10 India 293 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Türkiye: 22.8%United States: 22.5%Indonesia: 11.7%Pakistan: 7.8%6 others listed: 35.3%23%largest
Türkiye1,550 · 22.8%United States1,530 · 22.5%Indonesia799 · 11.7%Pakistan528 · 7.8%6 others listed2,400 · 35.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Islamic Studies and History research?

By volume in 2022-now, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most Islamic Studies and History research, followed by Islamic Azad University, Tehran and Russian Academy of Sciences.

Who are the leading researchers in Islamic Studies and History?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Islamic Studies and History include George Davey Smith, Aziz Sheikh and Michel Foucault.

  1. 1 George Davey Smith United Kingdom 435k citations
  2. 2 Aziz Sheikh United Kingdom 214k citations
  3. 3 Michel Foucault France 208k citations
  4. 4 David Alan Bennett United States 190k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Islamic Studies and History?

The most cited paper in Islamic Studies and History is "Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject" (Salwa Ismail, 2006), with 4,088 citations. Next come "Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others" (2,357) and "the romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women" (2,329).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject Salwa Ismail · American Anthropologist 26 Jul 2006 4,088
2 Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others Lila Abu‐Lughod · American Anthropologist Sep 2002 2,357
3 the romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women Lila Abu‐Lughod · American Ethnologist Feb 1990 2,329
4 Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity Michael Lambek · American Anthropologist 23 May 2005 2,190
5 Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival Saba Mahmood · Cultural Anthropology Open access May 2001 1,348
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Islamic Studies and History research done?

The largest centres of Islamic Studies and History research in 2022-now are Istanbul (Türkiye), Ankara (Türkiye), Tehran (Iran) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Herndon, Mardin and Qom.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 IstanbulTürkiye 279 works
  2. 2 AnkaraTürkiye 260 works
  3. 3 TehranIran 229 works
  4. 4 ParisFrance 181 works
  5. 5 MoscowRussia 133 works
  6. 6 LondonUnited Kingdom 126 works
  7. 7 Kuala LumpurMalaysia 121 works
  8. 8 TashkentUzbekistan 115 works
  9. 9 IslamabadPakistan 111 works
  10. 10 YogyakartaIndonesia 109 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. HerndonUS · 21.9 works66×
  2. MardinTR · 31.1 works35×
  3. QomIR · 47.4 works32×
  4. RamadiIQ · 68.9 works32×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Islamic Studies and History than the world average.

See Islamic Studies and History on the map

Where is the best place to study Islamic Studies and History?

Among universities, judged by research, International Islamic University Malaysia, Marmara University and Peking University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%mean 18.56%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Peking UniversityGulf University for …International Islami…Marmara University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1International Islamic University MalaysiaMalaysia 60.315.3%29.7×68 +47.2%
2Marmara UniversityTürkiye 55.611.8%18.5×58 +50.3%
3Peking UniversityChina 55.257.5%0.6×10 +95.7%
4Gulf University for Science & TechnologyKuwait 54.830.5%34.1×10 +612.5%
5Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University YogyakartaIndonesia 54.29.5%15.0×66 +240.0%
6Ankara UniversityTürkiye 53.515.3%10.6×42 +30.6%
7Istanbul UniversityTürkiye 53.113.0%13.5×46 +22.1%
8Institut Agama Islam Negeri BengkuluIndonesia 52.315.2%4.2×53 +483.3%
9UIN Sunan Ampel SurabayaIndonesia 52.312.1%16.6×47 +575.3%
10University of Islamic StudiesPakistan 52.15.4%162.8×51 +54.3%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Islamic Studies and History, country by country

Is Islamic Studies and History research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 15% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Islamic Studies and History.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Islamic Studies and History as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.043% in 2024.

still counting0.020%0.040%0.060%Islamic Studies and History0.045% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Islamic Studies and History over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Islamic Studies and History10.1% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Islamic Studies and History. Posts are plain text and can be reported.