Political and Economic history of UK and US
Political and Economic history of UK and US is a research topic within Political Science and International Relations. Science Explorer counts 23k research works in it since 1950. 22.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the concept of depoliticisation in the context of British politics and society, focusing on issues such as deindustrialization, rhetoric, the Conservative Party, economic policy, Thatcherism, social democracy, and the impact of industrial change. It delves into the processes and consequences of depoliticisation, examining its historical significance and theoretical implications within the British political landscape.
- Depoliticisation
- British Politics
- Deindustrialization
- Rhetoric
- Conservative Party
- Economic Policy
- Thatcherism
- Social Democracy
- Industrial Change
- Monetary Policy
- Research works
- 23k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 22.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -6% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Political and Economic history of UK and US research?
By volume, the United Kingdom and the United States publish the most (965 and 745 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United Kingdom 965 works
- 2 United States 745 works
- 3 Australia 259 works
- 4 Canada 145 works
- 5 France 117 works
- 6 Germany 99 works
- 7 Netherlands 58 works
- 8 Italy 58 works
- 9 Sweden 44 works
- 10 Denmark 44 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Political and Economic history of UK and US research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of Canberra publishes the most Political and Economic history of UK and US research, followed by Queen Mary University of London and University of Oxford.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of CanberraAustralia 51 works
- 2 Queen Mary University of LondonUnited Kingdom 40 works
- 3 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 36 works
- 4 Australian National UniversityAustralia 34 works
- 5 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 30 works
- 6 The University of SydneyAustralia 29 works
- 7 King's College LondonUnited Kingdom 27 works
- 8 University of EssexUnited Kingdom 26 works
- 9 University of GlasgowUnited Kingdom 25 works
- 10 London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom 25 works
Who are the leading researchers in Political and Economic history of UK and US?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Political and Economic history of UK and US include Robert J. Barro, Anthony Giddens and Francis Fukuyama.
- 1 Robert J. Barro United States 7.9k citations
- 2 Anthony Giddens United States 4.9k citations
- 3 Francis Fukuyama United States 4.1k citations
- 4 William Diebold United States 3.8k citations
- 5 Charles Tilly United States 3.7k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Political and Economic history of UK and US research done?
The largest centres of Political and Economic history of UK and US research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Canberra (Australia), Sydney (Australia) and New York (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Colchester, Canberra and York.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 London United Kingdom 232 works
- 2 Canberra Australia 85 works
- 3 Sydney Australia 52 works
- 4 New York United States 49 works
- 5 Oxford United Kingdom 49 works
- 6 Melbourne Australia 45 works
- 7 Cambridge United Kingdom 39 works
- 8 Toronto Canada 39 works
- 9 Paris France 37 works
- 10 Glasgow United Kingdom 36 works
Where it is the local speciality
- ColchesterGB · 25.6 works46×
- CanberraAU · 84.9 works21×
- YorkGB · 20.9 works18×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Political and Economic history of UK and US than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Political and Economic history of UK and US?
Among universities, judged by research, Leiden University, Queen Mary University of London and University of Glasgow score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leiden UniversityNetherlands | 79.9 | 47.7% | 10.2× | 10 | +207.1% |
| 2 | Queen Mary University of LondonUnited Kingdom | 77.2 | 19.2% | 34.6× | 40 | +189.8% |
| 3 | University of GlasgowUnited Kingdom | 73.6 | 24.8% | 14.6× | 25 | +186.7% |
| 4 | University of SheffieldUnited Kingdom | 71.6 | 36.2% | 15.4× | 23 | +58.2% |
| 5 | University of OxfordUnited Kingdom | 69.9 | 25.0% | 9.6× | 36 | +53.0% |
| 6 | University of WarwickUnited Kingdom | 67.4 | 30.5% | 18.5× | 24 | +23.7% |
| 7 | King's College LondonUnited Kingdom | 67.0 | 22.2% | 12.4× | 27 | +76.8% |
| 8 | London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom | 66.0 | 29.8% | 35.3× | 25 | +12.2% |
| 9 | University of CanberraAustralia | 65.6 | 1.3% | 109.7× | 51 | +686.4% |
| 10 | University of YorkUnited Kingdom | 64.5 | 25.6% | 19.9× | 18 | +93.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Political and Economic history of UK and US research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 6% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2017. The fastest-growing topics are Political and Economic history of UK and US.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.