Institute of Mongolian Buddhist and Tibetan Studies

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute of Mongolian Buddhist and Tibetan Studies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

1. Social Sciences#10,536 #5,452
2. Arts and Humanities#2,744 #1,387
3. Social Sciences#7,847 #4,454

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Language and Linguistics takes 38.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

1. Language and LinguisticsSubfield · 33.2 works38×
2. Arts and HumanitiesField · 61.0 works11×

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

• Arts and Humanities 10.7×
• Social Sciences 4.2×
• Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.0×
• Health Professions 0.6×
• Environmental Science 0.6×
• Psychology 0.6×
• Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.4×
• Computer Science 0.3×
• Nursing 0.3×
• Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
• Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
• Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
• Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
• Engineering 0.1×
• Medicine 0.1×

Ranked on the composite score, Richard K. Payne, Bulat R. Zoriktuev and В. В. Тишин lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute of Mongolian Buddhist and Tibetan Studies.

1. 1 🇷🇺 Richard K. Payne Russia · #283,994 worldwide 34 citations · 21 works
2. 2 🇷🇺 Bulat R. Zoriktuev Russia · #829,968 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
3. 3 🇷🇺 В. В. Тишин Russia · #979,187 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Linguistics, Etymology, Historical Phonology, Religion, History, Language Contact, Central Asia and Nationalism.

By volume in 2022–2025: Linguistics and Cultural Studies, Eurasian Exchange Networks, Chinese history and philosophy and Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication.

1. 1 Linguistics and Cultural Studies Language and Linguistics 22 works
2. 2 Eurasian Exchange Networks Anthropology 15 works
3. 3 Chinese history and philosophy Sociology and Political Science 13 works
4. 4 Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication Cultural Studies 8 works
5. 5 Linguistics and language evolution Language and Linguistics 7 works
6. 6 Soviet and Russian History Political Science and International Relations 7 works
7. 7 Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia Sociology and Political Science 7 works
8. 8 Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends Demography 6 works
9. 9 Indian and Buddhist Studies Religious studies 6 works
10. 10 Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies Literature and Literary Theory 5 works

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

Output in 2018–2022 was 1058% higher than in 2013–2017.

• Baikal Institute of Nature Management
• Buryat State University
• Institute of General and Experimental Biology
• Institute of Physical Materials Science
• East Siberia State University of Technology and Management
• Buryat State Academy of Agriculture
• East Siberian Academy of Culture and Arts
• Zabaykalsky National Park