Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Chinese history and philosophy

Chinese history and philosophy is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 105k research works in it since 1950. 3.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the religious diversity and regulation in Chinese society, covering topics such as Confucianism, Christianity, Falun Gong, the Cultural Revolution, nationalism, and the history of religion in China. It delves into the discourse of civilization, state regulation of religion, and the influence of emotions on beliefs.

  • Religion
  • China
  • Regulation
  • Confucianism
  • Christianity
  • Falun Gong
  • Cultural Revolution
  • Philosophy
  • Nationalism
  • History
Research works
105k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4k
per year above
Top-10% rate
3.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-22%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Chinese history and philosophy research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (3.5k and 1.7k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 3.5k works
  2. 2 United States 1.7k works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 441 works
  4. 4 France 322 works
  5. 5 Russia 301 works
  6. 6 Hong Kong 297 works
  7. 7 Germany 255 works
  8. 8 Japan 217 works
  9. 9 Australia 190 works
  10. 10 Canada 189 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 46.8%United States: 23.2%United Kingdom: 6.0%France: 4.4%6 others listed: 19.6%47%largest
China3,458 · 46.8%United States1,713 · 23.2%United Kingdom441 · 6.0%France322 · 4.4%6 others listed1,450 · 19.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Chinese history and philosophy research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Peking University publishes the most Chinese history and philosophy research, followed by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Renmin University of China.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Peking University China 156 works
  2. 2 Chinese Academy of Social Sciences China 109 works
  3. 3 Renmin University of China China 108 works
  4. 4 Wuhan University China 97 works
  5. 5 Beijing Language and Culture University China 95 works
  6. 6 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 90 works
  7. 7 Fudan University China 82 works
  8. 8 Tsinghua University China 81 works
  9. 9 Zhejiang University China 75 works
  10. 10 East China Normal University China 74 works

Who are the leading researchers in Chinese history and philosophy?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Chinese history and philosophy include Jun Zhang.

  1. 1 Jun Zhang 2.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Chinese history and philosophy research done?

The largest centres of Chinese history and philosophy research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Hong Kong (China) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Maha Sarakham.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 1k works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 417 works
  3. 3 Hong Kong China 213 works
  4. 4 Paris France 190 works
  5. 5 Wuhan China 179 works
  6. 6 Guangzhou China 151 works
  7. 7 Chengdu China 148 works
  8. 8 Moscow Russia 137 works
  9. 9 Nanjing China 137 works
  10. 10 Hangzhou China 135 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Maha SarakhamTH · 28.4 works28×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Chinese history and philosophy than the world average.

See Chinese history and philosophy on the map

Where is the best place to study Chinese history and philosophy?

Among universities, judged by research, Mahasarakham University, University of Vienna and Chinese University of Hong Kong score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 14.27%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Mahasarakham University: 28, 35.7%University of Vienna: 51, 7.4%Chinese University of Hong Kong: 90, 10.2%Ca' Foscari University of Venice: 32, 7.1%Chinese National Academy of Arts: 12, 29.8%University of Hong Kong: 72, 8.1%University of Macau: 44, 8.8%Hong Kong Baptist University: 37, 10.6%Education University of Hong Kong: 12, 18.2%Peking University: 156, 6.8%Mahasarakham Univers…Chinese University o…University of ViennaCa' Foscari Universi…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Mahasarakham University Thailand 71.235.7%31.5×28
2University of Vienna Austria 62.37.4%12.2×51 +297.8%
3Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 59.710.2%15.0×90 +14.9%
4Ca' Foscari University of Venice Italy 56.77.1%15.2×32 +301.5%
5Chinese National Academy of Arts China 56.729.8%372.7×12 -62.3%
6University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 56.58.1%9.8×72 +20.6%
7University of Macau Macau 55.38.8%15.9×44 +27.6%
8Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong 53.710.6%22.8×37 +8.3%
9Education University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 53.118.2%10.0×12 +44.8%
10Peking University China 52.86.8%11.7×156 -62.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Chinese history and philosophy research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 22% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2009.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.