Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
In research, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences stands highest in Social Sciences (#1,048 of 10,521 worldwide), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (#191 of 1,775 worldwide) and Economics and Econometrics (#186 of 1,272 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Economics, Econometrics and Finance — General Economics, Econometrics and Finance is 15.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #4,539 of 28,054 · #5,640 all time
- Rank in China
- #1,026 of 3,058
- Research works
- 8.5k ▲ 2% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 45k 5.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 19.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 14% world 28%
What is Chinese Academy of Social Sciences known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #1,048 of 10,521 | 19.7% | 987 | #1651 | |
| Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField | #191 of 1,775 | 30.6% | 215 | #548 | |
| Economics and EconometricsSubfield | #186 of 1,272 | 39.2% | 134 | #527 | |
| Social SciencesField | #1,084 of 6,365 | 15.8% | 545 | #1644 | |
| Political Science and International RelationsSubfield | #341 of 1,201 | 19.1% | 125 | #634 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #911 of 2,578 | 11.6% | 263 | #1105 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,302 of 12,888 | 19.4% | 251 | #4475 | |
| Business, Management and AccountingField | #1,310 of 2,578 | 26.2% | 98 | #1637 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #2,037 of 3,551 | 20.0% | 85 | #2660 | |
| EngineeringField | #4,288 of 6,636 | 20.6% | 65 | #4718 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Chinese Academy of Social Sciences sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#1,651 #1,048
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance#548 #191
- Economics and Econometrics#527 #186
- Social Sciences#1,644 #1,084
- Political Science and International Relations#634 #341
- Sociology and Political Science#1,105 #911
- Physical Sciences#4,475 #5,302
- Business, Management and Accounting#1,637 #1,310
- Environmental Science#2,660 #2,037
- Engineering#4,718 #4,288
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Chinese Academy of Social Sciences specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: General Economics, Econometrics and Finance takes 15.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceSubfield · 49.9 works15×
- FinanceSubfield · 30.8 works7.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField · 215.2 works7.6×
- Economics and EconometricsSubfield · 134.4 works6.4×
- Political Science and International RelationsSubfield · 125.0 works6.4×
- Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield · 262.8 works5.6×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 7.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7.6×
- Social Sciences 3.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.3×
- Arts and Humanities 1.9×
- Environmental Science 1.3×
- Energy 1.3×
- Psychology 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Veterinary 0.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences?
Ranked on the composite score, Fang Cai, Yanqun Zhang and Wei Houkai lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
- 1 Fang Cai China · #52,024 worldwide 324 citations · 75 works
- 2 Yanqun Zhang China · #189,790 worldwide 119 citations · 35 works
- 3 Wei Houkai China · #237,394 worldwide 113 citations · 21 works
- 4 W. Di Nicolantonio China · #293,532 worldwide 143 citations · 20 works
- 5 Jia Shu-cun China · #397,778 worldwide 0 citations · 24 works
- 6 Lisheng Dong China · #413,735 worldwide 22 citations · 23 works
- 7 Wenzhao Tao China · #454,672 worldwide 1 citations · 21 works
- 8 Ying Chen China · #469,651 worldwide 276 citations · 83 works
- 9 Aijun Li China · #587,625 worldwide 166 citations · 60 works
- 10 Quheng Deng China · #626,172 worldwide 61 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: China, Nationalism, History, Economic Growth, Religion, Regulation, Globalization and Philosophy.
- Environmental Policy
- Geopolitics
- International Relations
- Kuznets Curve
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Environmental Regulation
- Financial Development
- land policy
- Regional Development
- Innovation
- Inequality
- Political Economy
- Governance
- Sustainable Development
- Falun Gong
- Christianity
- Philosophy
- Religion
- History
- Nationalism
- China
- Globalization
- Economic Growth
- Regulation
- Economic Development
- Confucianism
- Urbanization
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Migration
- Renewable Energy
- Authoritarianism
- Reform
- Panel Data Analysis
- Global Trade
- CO2 Emissions
- Energy Consumption
- Trade Openness
- Regional Planning
- Agricultural Development
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- China154▲ 126×7 topics
- Nationalism141▲ 23×15 topics
- Globalization137▲ 5.3×76 topics
- History128▲ 14×14 topics
- Economic Growth128▲ 11×29 topics
- Religion127▲ 20×18 topics
- Regulation120▲ 17×10 topics
- Philosophy113▲ 19×11 topics
- Economic Development113▲ 11×31 topics
- Christianity110▲ 141×3 topics
- Confucianism109▲ 199×1 topic
- Falun Gong109▲ 199×1 topic
- Urbanization84▲ 15×12 topics
- Sustainable Development75▲ 3.6×54 topics
- Climate Change71▲ 2.0×65 topics
- Governance67▲ 16×9 topics
- Sustainability65▲ 2.0×67 topics
- Political Economy63▲ 19×14 topics
- Migration59▲ 13×13 topics
- Inequality55▲ 18×9 topics
- Renewable Energy49▲ 2.6×32 topics
- Innovation44▲ 3.2×33 topics
- Authoritarianism42▲ 36×3 topics
- Regional Development39▲ 8.3×12 topics
- Reform38▲ 45×2 topics
- land policy38▲ 148×1 topic
- Panel Data Analysis36▲ 17×3 topics
- Financial Development34▲ 17×2 topics
- Global Trade32▲ 12×9 topics
- Environmental Regulation31▲ 16×3 topics
- CO2 Emissions31▲ 13×3 topics
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions31▲ 8.6×6 topics
- Energy Consumption29▲ 9.9×4 topics
- Kuznets Curve29▲ 20×1 topic
- Trade Openness29▲ 20×1 topic
- International Relations29▲ 9.0×17 topics
- Regional Planning28▲ 28×2 topics
- Geopolitics26▲ 13×10 topics
- Agricultural Development25▲ 12×3 topics
- Environmental Policy24▲ 9.1×7 topics
Which research topics does Chinese Academy of Social Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Chinese history and philosophy, China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance, Energy, Environment, Economic Growth and Regional Development and Environment.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Chinese history and philosophy Sociology and Political Science 109 works
- 2 China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance Political Science and International Relations 38 works
- 3 Energy, Environment, Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 29 works
- 4 Regional Development and Environment Sociology and Political Science 19 works
- 5 Global trade and economics General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 works
- 6 China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations Sociology and Political Science 17 works
- 7 Climate Change Policy and Economics Economics and Econometrics 16 works
- 8 International Development and Aid Development 14 works
- 9 Global Financial Crisis and Policies Finance 14 works
- 10 Environmental Impact and Sustainability Environmental Engineering 13 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Chinese Academy of Social Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Beijing
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Tsinghua University
- Peking University
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Beihang University
- Beijing Institute of Technology
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
- North China Electric Power University
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.