Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Vienna · Austria

International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River

Research works
21
▼ 18% vs 2013–17
Citations
488
22.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
33%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Which keywords describe research at International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, European Union, European Integration, Governance, Sovereignty, Constitutionalism, European Legal Systems and Fundamental Rights.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 27 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 27 words, with their numbers
  1. Human Rights6▲ 31×10 topics
  2. European Union5▲ 92×6 topics
  3. European Integration2▲ 155×1 topic
  4. Governance2▲ 33×1 topic
  5. Sovereignty2▲ 81×4 topics
  6. Constitutionalism2▲ 68×2 topics
  7. European Legal Systems1▲ 140×1 topic
  8. Fundamental Rights1▲ 312×2 topics
  9. Judicial Review1▲ 57×1 topic
  10. Research Methods1▲ 50×1 topic
  11. Social Work1▲ 78×1 topic
  12. Criminal Law1▲ 65×1 topic
  13. Global Governance1▲ 25×2 topics
  14. Mutual Recognition1▲ 329×1 topic
  15. Globalization1▲ 2.8×4 topics
  16. Resilience1▲ 13×2 topics
  17. Black Sea1▲ 126×1 topic
  18. Community1▲ 42×1 topic
  19. Development1▲ 14×1 topic
  20. Disaster1▲ 139×1 topic
  21. European Union Cohesion Policy1▲ 186×1 topic
  22. Holocene1▲ 28×1 topic
  23. Millennium Development Goals1▲ 304×1 topic
  24. Phenomenology1▲ 38×1 topic
  25. Psychiatric Disorders1▲ 31×1 topic
  26. Smart Specialization1▲ 125×1 topic
  27. Social Movements1▲ 15×2 topics

Which research topics does International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Crime Patterns and Interventions, Intimate Partner and Family Violence, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations and Global Health and Epidemiology.

  1. 1 Crime Patterns and Interventions Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  2. 2 Intimate Partner and Family Violence Health 0 works
  3. 3 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 0 works
  4. 4 Global Health and Epidemiology Health Information Management 0 works
  5. 5 Poxvirus research and outbreaks Virology 0 works
  6. 6 Diverse Scientific Research Studies General Health Professions 0 works
  7. 7 Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis Surgery 0 works
  8. 8 Virology and Viral Diseases Epidemiology 0 works
  9. 9 Immune responses and vaccinations Immunology 0 works
  10. 10 Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare Safety Research 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available32.9%not open67.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors43.2%domestic only56.8%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 18% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Vienna

All research institutions in Vienna

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.