Living with Disability
In research, Living with Disability stands highest in Social Sciences (#12,522 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #37,108 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #1,988 of 2,253
- Research works
- 258 ▼ 22% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 4.6k 17.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 22.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 30% world 28%
What is Living with Disability known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #12,522 of 16,945 | 25.5% | 147 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Living with Disability sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.7×
- Neuroscience 4.0×
- Health Professions 3.5×
- Social Sciences 3.0×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Nursing 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.1×
Which keywords describe research at Living with Disability?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Mental Health, Social Support, Inclusion, Elderly Care, Intersectionality, Poverty and Intellectual Disability.
- Systematic Review
- Social Skills Interventions
- Rehabilitation
- Coping Strategies
- Professionalism
- Neuroanatomy
- Elderly
- Down Syndrome
- Executive Functioning
- Embodiment
- Neuroscience
- Health Disparities
- Epidemiological Study
- Prevalence
- Intellectual Disability
- Depression
- Human Rights
- Healthcare
- Inclusion
- Mental Health
- Quality of Life
- Social Support
- Elderly Care
- Intersectionality
- Poverty
- Direct Payments
- Personalisation
- Social Work
- Social Model of Disability
- Income Inequality
- Stress
- Emotion Recognition
- Genetics
- Early Intervention
- Genetic Counseling
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Psychiatric Treatment
- Self-Efficacy
- Mental Health Services
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Quality of Life4▲ 7.8×13 topics
- Mental Health3▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Social Support2▲ 11×9 topics
- Inclusion2▲ 41×2 topics
- Elderly Care2▲ 35×2 topics
- Healthcare2▲ 4.5×3 topics
- Intersectionality2▲ 27×3 topics
- Human Rights2▲ 4.7×3 topics
- Poverty2▲ 53×2 topics
- Depression2▲ 5.0×5 topics
- Direct Payments2▲ 457×1 topic
- Intellectual Disability2▲ 196×2 topics
- Personalisation2▲ 457×1 topic
- Prevalence2▲ 11×4 topics
- Social Work2▲ 64×2 topics
- Epidemiological Study2▲ 65×1 topic
- Social Model of Disability2▲ 317×1 topic
- Health Disparities2▲ 15×3 topics
- Income Inequality1▲ 25×2 topics
- Neuroscience1▲ 13×4 topics
- Stress1▲ 10×3 topics
- Embodiment1▲ 18×3 topics
- Emotion Recognition1▲ 18×2 topics
- Executive Functioning1▲ 26×2 topics
- Genetics1▲ 5.0×5 topics
- Down Syndrome1▲ 284×1 topic
- Early Intervention1▲ 34×2 topics
- Elderly1▲ 12×2 topics
- Genetic Counseling1▲ 284×1 topic
- Neuroanatomy1▲ 32×3 topics
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders1▲ 24×3 topics
- Professionalism1▲ 18×2 topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorders1▲ 29×1 topic
- Coping Strategies1▲ 12×3 topics
- Psychiatric Treatment1▲ 125×2 topics
- Rehabilitation1▲ 7.2×4 topics
- Self-Efficacy1▲ 11×2 topics
- Social Skills Interventions1▲ 46×1 topic
- Mental Health Services1▲ 52×2 topics
- Systematic Review1▲ 52×2 topics
Which research topics does Living with Disability publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Healthcare innovation and challenges, Disability Rights and Representation, Down syndrome and intellectual disability research and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Healthcare innovation and challenges Education 2 works
- 2 Disability Rights and Representation Safety Research 2 works
- 3 Down syndrome and intellectual disability research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 4 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
- 5 Legal Education and Practice Innovations Law 1 works
- 6 Health and Well-being Studies Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 7 Mental Health and Psychiatry Philosophy 1 works
- 8 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 1 works
- 9 Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics Biomedical Engineering 1 works
- 10 Social Policy and Reform Studies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Living with Disability's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 22% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.