Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
In research, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,351 of 10,521 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,138 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Law, Political Science and International Relations and Social Sciences — Law is 40.0× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #26,184 of 28,054 · #22,980 all time
- Rank in Germany
- #1,072 of 1,178
- Research works
- 2.2k ◆ 2% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.4k 1.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 28% world 28%
What is Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,351 of 10,521 | 7.2% | 169 | #3879 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,138 of 6,365 | 7.5% | 126 | #3663 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Law takes 40.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- LawSubfield · 41.0 works40×
- Political Science and International RelationsSubfield · 35.5 works14×
- Social SciencesField · 125.8 works5.7×
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 27.8 works5.5×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Social Sciences 5.7×
- Arts and Humanities 5.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.2×
- Psychology 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Engineering 0.0×
- Decision Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory?
Ranked on the composite score, Heinz Mohnhaupt, Karl Härter and Miloš Več lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory.
- 1 Heinz Mohnhaupt Germany · #212,862 worldwide 10 citations · 67 works
- 2 Karl Härter Germany · #216,203 worldwide 17 citations · 75 works
- 3 Miloš Več Germany · #235,304 worldwide 32 citations · 81 works
- 4 Michael Stolleis Germany · #278,344 worldwide 70 citations · 252 works
- 5 Caspar Ehlers Germany · #302,116 worldwide 1 citations · 49 works
- 6 Thomas Duve Germany · #313,144 worldwide 11 citations · 59 works
- 7 Thomas Gergen Germany · #347,096 worldwide 3 citations · 89 works
- 8 Manuela Bragagnolo Germany · #376,968 worldwide 4 citations · 25 works
- 9 Stefan Vogenauer Germany · #379,207 worldwide 18 citations · 25 works
- 10 Jan-Henrik Meyer Germany · #382,023 worldwide 17 citations · 43 works
Which keywords describe research at Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, Nationalism, Legal Methodology, Constitutionalism, Gender, Criminal Justice, Regulatory Agencies and Constitutional Courts.
- Constitutional government
- Imperialism
- Ethical Theory
- Constitutional Law
- Political Philosophy
- Social Change
- Judicial Review
- History
- Transatlantic Slave Trade
- Identity
- Religion
- Cultural Identity
- Legal History
- Colonialism
- Digital Governance
- Migration Law
- Regulatory Agencies
- Criminal Justice
- Legal Methodology
- Nationalism
- Human Rights
- Constitutionalism
- Gender
- Globalization
- Constitutional Courts
- Privacy
- Party Competition
- African Diaspora
- Public Opinion
- Racial Identity
- Reformation
- Atlantic History
- Religious Influence
- Democracy
- European Union
- Federalism
- Cultural Studies
- Legal Education
- Nordic Welfare States
- American founding
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Human Rights36▲ 20×22 topics
- Nationalism16▲ 19×12 topics
- Constitutionalism15▲ 91×5 topics
- Legal Methodology15▲ 470×2 topics
- Gender14▲ 15×18 topics
- Criminal Justice14▲ 36×4 topics
- Globalization14▲ 4.0×23 topics
- Regulatory Agencies14▲ 350×2 topics
- Constitutional Courts14▲ 509×2 topics
- Migration Law14▲ 520×2 topics
- Privacy13▲ 26×2 topics
- Digital Governance13▲ 634×1 topic
- Party Competition13▲ 634×1 topic
- Colonialism12▲ 15×18 topics
- African Diaspora10▲ 153×3 topics
- Legal History10▲ 210×4 topics
- Public Opinion10▲ 45×3 topics
- Cultural Identity10▲ 10×6 topics
- Racial Identity9▲ 221×2 topics
- Religion9▲ 11×13 topics
- Reformation9▲ 179×2 topics
- Identity9▲ 7.2×14 topics
- Atlantic History8▲ 277×1 topic
- Transatlantic Slave Trade8▲ 277×1 topic
- Religious Influence8▲ 237×2 topics
- History8▲ 6.2×13 topics
- Democracy8▲ 12×8 topics
- Judicial Review8▲ 47×3 topics
- European Union7▲ 18×13 topics
- Social Change7▲ 32×3 topics
- Federalism7▲ 60×3 topics
- Political Philosophy7▲ 68×3 topics
- Cultural Studies7▲ 10×5 topics
- Constitutional Law6▲ 26×5 topics
- Legal Education6▲ 40×2 topics
- Ethical Theory6▲ 499×1 topic
- Nordic Welfare States6▲ 615×1 topic
- Imperialism6▲ 40×4 topics
- American founding5▲ 100×1 topic
- Constitutional government5▲ 100×1 topic
Which research topics does Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Law and Political Science, Colonialism, slavery, and trade, Historical Legal Studies and Society and American Constitutional Law and Politics.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Law and Political Science Law 13 works
- 2 Colonialism, slavery, and trade Anthropology 8 works
- 3 Historical Legal Studies and Society Political Science and International Relations 6 works
- 4 American Constitutional Law and Politics Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 5 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 6 Judicial and Constitutional Studies Law 4 works
- 7 African history and culture studies Anthropology 4 works
- 8 Legal Education and Practice Innovations Law 4 works
- 9 Reformation and Early Modern Christianity History 4 works
- 10 Criminal Law and Policy Sociology and Political Science 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Frankfurt am Main
- Goethe University Frankfurt
- University Hospital Frankfurt
- European Central Bank
- DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education
- Gesundheitsamt
- Max Planck Institute of Biophysics
- Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt
- Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.