Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Norfolk · United States

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

peta.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
17
▼ 64% vs 2013–17
Citations
215
12.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
24.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
55%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Immunology and Microbiology: 4.18× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 3.71× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceEnvironmental Science: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMedicine: 0.69× its world share, 0 worksMedicineVeterinary: 46.47× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryPsychology: 0.97× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.99× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 46.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which research topics does People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Ombudsman and Human Rights, Environmental law and policy, European and International Law Studies and Immune responses and vaccinations.

Ombudsman and Human Rights0Ombudsman and Human Rights: 0 fractional worksEnvironmental law and po…0Environmental law and policy: 0 fractional worksEuropean and Internation…0European and International Law Studies: 0 fractional worksImmune responses and vaccinations: 0 fractional worksAnimal testing and alternatives: 0 fractional worksZoonotic diseases and public health: 0 fractional worksVirology and Viral Diseases: 0 fractional works
Sociology and Political ScienceLawPolitical Science and International RelationsImmunology3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Ombudsman and Human Rights Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  2. 2 Environmental law and policy Law 0 works
  3. 3 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  4. 4 Immune responses and vaccinations Immunology 0 works
  5. 5 Animal testing and alternatives Small Animals 0 works
  6. 6 Zoonotic diseases and public health Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  7. 7 Virology and Viral Diseases Epidemiology 0 works
  8. 8 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Treatment of Major Depression Pharmacology 0 works
  10. 10 Pain Management and Placebo Effect Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available55.3%not open44.7%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.3%domestic only90.7%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 64% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Norfolk

All research institutions in Norfolk

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.