Phoenix Contact (United States)
In research, Phoenix Contact (United States) stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,818 of 10,521 worldwide), Health Sciences (#9,676 of 11,982 worldwide) and Medicine (#9,168 of 10,443 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in General Health Professions — General Health Professions is 5.9× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #17,588 of 28,054 · #13,371 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,520 of 4,192
- Research works
- 1.3k ▲ 159% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 13k 9.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 30% world 28%
What is Phoenix Contact (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,818 of 10,521 | 14.7% | 73 | #9987 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,676 of 11,982 | 2.6% | 167 | #3660 | |
| MedicineField | #9,168 of 10,443 | 1.6% | 126 | #7752 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Phoenix Contact (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#9,987 #6,818
- Health Sciences#3,660 #9,676
- Medicine#7,752 #9,168
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Phoenix Contact (United States) specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: General Health Professions takes 5.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- General Health ProfessionsSubfield · 25.0 works5.9×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 4.5×
- Nursing 2.4×
- Medicine 2.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.4×
- Psychology 1.3×
- Dentistry 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Arts and Humanities 1.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.9×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Energy 0.2×
- Veterinary 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Phoenix Contact (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, Antoinette Chauvenet, M Lluch and Femke Snelting lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Phoenix Contact (United States).
- 1 Antoinette Chauvenet United States · #618,733 worldwide 2 citations · 18 works
- 2 M Lluch United States · #718,515 worldwide 30 citations · 19 works
- 3 Femke Snelting United States · #1,124,151 worldwide 0 citations · 20 works
- 4 Jane United States · #1,204,421 worldwide 6 citations · 55 works
Which keywords describe research at Phoenix Contact (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Public Health, Primary Care, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Clinical Guidelines, Mental Health and Ethical Considerations.
- Advance Care Planning
- Health Care Utilization
- Practice Recommendations
- Clinical Practice
- Flexible Automation
- End-of-Life
- Ethical Practices
- Healthcare Utilization
- Health Policy
- Epidemiological Study
- Public Health Policy
- Chronic Diseases
- Medical Ethics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Risk Factors
- Management
- Palliative Care
- Treatment
- Primary Care
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Quality of Life
- Mental Health
- Healthcare
- Diagnosis
- Clinical Guidelines
- Ethical Considerations
- Quality Improvement
- Surgical Management
- Health Care Costs
- End-of-Life Care
- Patient Outcomes
- Healthcare Quality
- Patient Rights
- Healthcare Legislation
- Cancer Risk
- Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Guideline Development
- Germany
- Health Surveys
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology25▲ 2.1×85 topics
- Public Health18▲ 3.9×40 topics
- Quality of Life10▲ 2.4×37 topics
- Primary Care10▲ 8.5×15 topics
- Mental Health10▲ 2.2×26 topics
- Treatment8▲ 2.2×27 topics
- Healthcare7▲ 2.1×19 topics
- Palliative Care7▲ 15×6 topics
- Diagnosis7▲ 2.5×23 topics
- Management6▲ 2.5×20 topics
- Clinical Guidelines6▲ 6.8×7 topics
- Risk Factors6▲ 1.77×16 topics
- Ethical Considerations6▲ 5.5×9 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines5▲ 2.8×11 topics
- Quality Improvement5▲ 7.9×8 topics
- Medical Ethics5▲ 11×5 topics
- Surgical Management4▲ 3.5×14 topics
- Chronic Diseases4▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Health Care Costs4▲ 16×2 topics
- Public Health Policy4▲ 4.6×2 topics
- End-of-Life Care4▲ 11×3 topics
- Epidemiological Study4▲ 18×3 topics
- Patient Outcomes4▲ 21×3 topics
- Health Policy4▲ 7.7×4 topics
- Healthcare Quality4▲ 12×4 topics
- Healthcare Utilization4▲ 15×3 topics
- Patient Rights4▲ 16×2 topics
- Ethical Practices4▲ 18×1 topic
- Healthcare Legislation4▲ 19×1 topic
- End-of-Life4▲ 12×3 topics
- Cancer Risk3▲ 5.0×6 topics
- Flexible Automation3▲ 41×1 topic
- Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems3▲ 41×1 topic
- Clinical Practice3▲ 6.4×5 topics
- Guideline Development3▲ 46×1 topic
- Practice Recommendations3▲ 46×1 topic
- Germany3▲ 44×1 topic
- Health Care Utilization3▲ 7.6×2 topics
- Health Surveys3▲ 44×1 topic
- Advance Care Planning3▲ 14×1 topic
Which research topics does Phoenix Contact (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Health, Medicine and Society, Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Clinical practice guidelines implementation and Health and Medical Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 4 works
- 2 Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 3 works
- 3 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3 works
- 4 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 3 works
- 5 Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3 works
- 6 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 7 Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2 works
- 8 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 9 Ethics in medical practice General Health Professions 2 works
- 10 Climate Change and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Phoenix Contact (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 159% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.