Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Brussels · Belgium

Polis

Research works
28
▲ 59% vs 2013–17
Citations
102
3.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
62%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Polis is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.61× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 4.76× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 2.01× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.38× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Polis?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Religion, Governance, Leadership, Sustainability, Democracy, Neoliberalism, Inequality and Ecosystem Services.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 20 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 20 words, with their numbers
  1. Sustainability2▲ 3.6×5 topics
  2. Globalization2▲ 2.9×5 topics
  3. Governance1▲ 17×4 topics
  4. Religion1▲ 8.6×4 topics
  5. Leadership1▲ 14×2 topics
  6. Mental Health1▲ 3.7×4 topics
  7. Democracy1▲ 10×4 topics
  8. Inequality1▲ 15×4 topics
  9. Neoliberalism1▲ 11×2 topics
  10. Public Health1▲ 2.8×3 topics
  11. Archaeology1▲ 23×1 topic
  12. COVID-191▲ 5.3×1 topic
  13. Ecological Wisdom1▲ 1113×1 topic
  14. Ecosystem Services1▲ 11×2 topics
  15. Health Effects1▲ 5.9×1 topic
  16. Landscape Urbanism1▲ 1113×1 topic
  17. Media System1▲ 326×1 topic
  18. Mediterranean1▲ 33×1 topic
  19. Noise Pollution1▲ 85×1 topic
  20. Urban Planning1▲ 49×2 topics

Which research topics does Polis publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Gender, Feminism, and Media, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Classical Philosophy and Thought and Gender Roles and Identity Studies.

  1. 1 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 1 works
  2. 2 Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender Studies 0 works
  3. 3 Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophy 0 works
  4. 4 Gender Roles and Identity Studies Gender Studies 0 works
  5. 5 Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  6. 6 Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology Clinical Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Contemporary Literature and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  8. 8 Smart Cities and Technologies Media Technology 0 works
  9. 9 Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation 0 works
  10. 10 Legal and Social Justice Studies Law 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available62.4%not open37.6%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors56.6%domestic only43.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Polis's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 59% higher than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Brussels

All research institutions in Brussels

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.