Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Philosophy

Classical Philosophy and Thought

Classical Philosophy and Thought is a research topic within Philosophy. Science Explorer counts 31k research works in it since 1950. 13.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in ancient philosophy, including the works and influence of Plato, Aristotle, Stoicism, Epicureanism, Hellenistic philosophy, Presocratic philosophers, Roman thought, ancient ethics, metaphysics, and ancient theology.

  • Plato
  • Aristotle
  • Stoicism
  • Epicureanism
  • Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Presocratic Philosophers
  • Roman Thought
  • Ancient Ethics
  • Metaphysics
  • Ancient Theology
Research works
31k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
13.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+9%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Classical Philosophy and Thought research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (854 and 336 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 854 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 336 works
  3. 3 Italy 298 works
  4. 4 France 296 works
  5. 5 Brazil 240 works
  6. 6 Germany 226 works
  7. 7 Spain 168 works
  8. 8 Canada 135 works
  9. 9 Russia 134 works
  10. 10 Poland 93 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 30.7%United Kingdom: 12.1%Italy: 10.7%France: 10.7%6 others listed: 35.8%31%largest
United States854 · 30.7%United Kingdom336 · 12.1%Italy298 · 10.7%France296 · 10.7%6 others listed996 · 35.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Classical Philosophy and Thought research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Ca' Foscari University of Venice publishes the most Classical Philosophy and Thought research, followed by University of Cambridge and University of Oxford.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Ca' Foscari University of VeniceItaly 68 works
  2. 2 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 51 works
  3. 3 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 46 works
  4. 4 University of TorontoCanada 34 works
  5. 5 Universidad de Buenos AiresArgentina 29 works
  6. 6 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 24 works
  7. 7 KU LeuvenBelgium 24 works
  8. 8 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 22 works
  9. 9 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico 22 works
  10. 10 Universidade de BrasíliaBrazil 20 works

Who are the leading researchers in Classical Philosophy and Thought?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Classical Philosophy and Thought include Michel Foucault.

  1. 1 Michel Foucault Poland 4.6k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Classical Philosophy and Thought research done?

The largest centres of Classical Philosophy and Thought research in 2022–2025 are Paris (France), Moscow (Russia), Venice (Italy) and Madrid (Spain). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Venice and Pátrai.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Paris France 120 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 71 works
  3. 3 Venice Italy 68 works
  4. 4 Madrid Spain 64 works
  5. 5 New York United States 60 works
  6. 6 London United Kingdom 58 works
  7. 7 Rome Italy 58 works
  8. 8 Cambridge United Kingdom 53 works
  9. 9 Toronto Canada 52 works
  10. 10 Oxford United Kingdom 51 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. VeniceIT · 67.7 works52×
  2. PátraiGR · 21.8 works16×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Classical Philosophy and Thought than the world average.

See Classical Philosophy and Thought on the map

Where is the best place to study Classical Philosophy and Thought?

Among universities, judged by research, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, University of Novi Sad and University of Oxford score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 18.93%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Ca' Foscari University of Venice: 68, 14.2%University of Novi Sad: 14, 24.9%University of Oxford: 46, 16.8%KU Leuven: 24, 23.9%Durham University: 16, 20.2%University of Tübingen: 18, 11.9%University of Cambridge: 52, 9.6%Metropolitan State University of Denver: 8, 38.8%Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: 15, 16.3%Dartmouth College: 17, 12.7%University of Novi SadKU LeuvenUniversity of OxfordCa' Foscari Universi…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Ca' Foscari University of VeniceItaly 73.514.2%72.0×68 +212.5%
2 University of Novi SadSerbia 68.524.9%11.3×14 +255.9%
3 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 63.216.8%9.4×46 -5.4%
4 KU LeuvenBelgium 61.523.9%7.0×24 +82.7%
5 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 58.320.2%11.6×16 +31.6%
6 University of TübingenGermany 58.211.9%12.4×18 +124.1%
7 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 57.79.6%12.3×52 -65.1%
8 Metropolitan State University of DenverUnited States 57.738.8%96.5×8 -26.7%
9 Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinGermany 56.916.3%10.9×15 +71.9%
10 Dartmouth CollegeUnited States 55.112.7%22.7×17 +85.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Classical Philosophy and Thought research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 9% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Classical Philosophy and Thought.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.