Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Philosophy

Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Theology and Philosophy of Evil is a research topic within Philosophy. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1950. 16.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the philosophical and theological problem of evil, including discussions on theodicy, divine hiddenness, skeptical theism, original sin, free will defense, divine providence, moral skepticism, evidential arguments, and human suffering.

  • Problem of Evil
  • Theodicy
  • Divine Hiddenness
  • Skeptical Theism
  • Original Sin
  • Free Will Defense
  • Divine Providence
  • Moral Skepticism
  • Evidential Arguments
  • Human Suffering
Research works
13k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
16.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+14%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Theology and Philosophy of Evil research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (709 and 276 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 709 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 276 works
  3. 3 Germany 76 works
  4. 4 Poland 62 works
  5. 5 Canada 61 works
  6. 6 Italy 58 works
  7. 7 Australia 46 works
  8. 8 South Africa 39 works
  9. 9 Netherlands 37 works
  10. 10 China 32 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 50.8%United Kingdom: 19.8%Germany: 5.5%Poland: 4.5%6 others listed: 19.5%51%largest
United States709 · 50.8%United Kingdom276 · 19.8%Germany76 · 5.5%Poland62 · 4.5%6 others listed272 · 19.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Theology and Philosophy of Evil research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Oxford publishes the most Theology and Philosophy of Evil research, followed by University of Cambridge and University of St Andrews.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 43 works
  2. 2 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 25 works
  3. 3 University of St AndrewsUnited Kingdom 23 works
  4. 4 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 17 works
  5. 5 University of Notre DameUnited States 17 works
  6. 6 The University of Texas at AustinUnited States 15 works
  7. 7 Loyola University ChicagoUnited States 14 works
  8. 8 Baylor UniversityUnited States 14 works
  9. 9 University of TorontoCanada 12 works
  10. 10 Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNetherlands 12 works

Who are the leading researchers in Theology and Philosophy of Evil?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Theology and Philosophy of Evil include Thomas Nagel.

  1. 1 Thomas Nagel Germany 1.8k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Theology and Philosophy of Evil research done?

The largest centres of Theology and Philosophy of Evil research in 2022–2025 are Oxford (United Kingdom), London (United Kingdom), Rome (Italy) and Cambridge (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in St Andrews and Oxford.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Oxford United Kingdom 49 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 35 works
  3. 3 Rome Italy 32 works
  4. 4 Cambridge United Kingdom 28 works
  5. 5 New York United States 23 works
  6. 6 St Andrews United Kingdom 23 works
  7. 7 Chicago United States 22 works
  8. 8 Toronto Canada 19 works
  9. 9 Austin United States 18 works
  10. 10 Los Angeles United States 17 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. St AndrewsGB · 22.5 works57×
  2. OxfordGB · 48.8 works15×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Theology and Philosophy of Evil than the world average.

See Theology and Philosophy of Evil on the map

Where is the best place to study Theology and Philosophy of Evil?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Pretoria, University of St Andrews and University of Oxford score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 24.04%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Pretoria: 11, 52.7%University of St Andrews: 22, 22.9%University of Oxford: 43, 13.0%University of Cambridge: 25, 12.1%Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: 12, 20.7%University of Notre Dame: 17, 30.2%University of Helsinki: 12, 17.0%University of Aberdeen: 9, 30.8%University of Birmingham: 12, 24.1%Durham University: 17, 16.9%University of PretoriaUniversity of St And…University of OxfordUniversity of Cambri…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of PretoriaSouth Africa 65.352.7%14.1×11 -16.1%
2 University of St AndrewsUnited Kingdom 65.022.9%57.1×22 +98.4%
3 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 63.313.0%18.9×43 -23.8%
4 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 62.512.1%12.6×25 +80.0%
5 Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNetherlands 57.620.7%17.2×12 +59.3%
6 University of Notre DameUnited States 57.330.2%30.0×17 +27.7%
7 University of HelsinkiFinland 55.717.0%11.2×12 +101.4%
8 University of AberdeenUnited Kingdom 55.030.8%25.5×9 -16.4%
9 University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom 53.924.1%11.4×12 -10.1%
10 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 52.816.9%25.8×17 -3.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Theology and Philosophy of Evil research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 14% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Theology and Philosophy of Evil.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.