- Research works
- 21 ▼ 79% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 174 8.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 66% world 28%
Not ranked overall: R.U.Robots (United Kingdom) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 5.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which keywords describe research at R.U.Robots (United Kingdom)?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cultural Identity, Ethnographic Research, Corporate Governance, Gender Studies, Social Movements, Economic Development, Hispanic World and Independence.
- State Policies
- Order Picking
- Healthcare Access
- Discourse Analysis
- Public Action
- Independence
- Economic Development
- Gender Studies
- Ethnographic Research
- Cultural Identity
- Corporate Governance
- Social Movements
- Hispanic World
- Professional Practices
- Argumentation
- Financialization
- Indigenous Peoples
- Shareholder Value
- Warehouse Design
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 19 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 19 words, with their numbers
- Cultural Identity2▲ 26×2 topics
- Ethnographic Research2▲ 207×2 topics
- Corporate Governance2▲ 13×2 topics
- Gender Studies1▲ 45×2 topics
- Social Movements1▲ 21×2 topics
- Economic Development1▲ 9.5×2 topics
- Hispanic World1▲ 349×1 topic
- Independence1▲ 349×1 topic
- Professional Practices1▲ 165×1 topic
- Public Action1▲ 165×1 topic
- Argumentation1▲ 121×1 topic
- Discourse Analysis1▲ 21×1 topic
- Financialization1▲ 54×1 topic
- Healthcare Access1▲ 26×2 topics
- Indigenous Peoples1▲ 222×1 topic
- Order Picking1▲ 110×1 topic
- Shareholder Value1▲ 53×1 topic
- State Policies1▲ 635×1 topic
- Warehouse Design1▲ 110×1 topic
Which research topics does R.U.Robots (United Kingdom) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Historical Studies in Latin America, Indigenous Cultures and History, Latin American history and culture and Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Historical Studies in Latin America Demography 1 works
- 2 Indigenous Cultures and History Anthropology 1 works
- 3 Latin American history and culture Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1 works
- 4 Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction General Health Professions 0 works
- 5 Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory History 0 works
- 6 Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Paleontology 0 works
- 7 Gender, Health, and Social Inequality Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 8 Robotic Path Planning Algorithms Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
- 9 Reinforcement Learning in Robotics Artificial Intelligence 0 works
- 10 Optimization and Search Problems Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has R.U.Robots (United Kingdom)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 79% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Manchester
- University of Manchester
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Manchester Royal Infirmary
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
- The Christie Hospital
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute
- Wythenshawe Hospital
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.