Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Latin American history and culture

Latin American history and culture is a research topic within Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Science Explorer counts 19k research works in it since 1950. 14.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the visual culture, indigenous history, and cultural exchange in Colonial Spanish America. It delves into topics such as ethnic identities, religious practices, language policy, and legal cultures, offering insights into the complex dynamics of the era. The papers also touch on postcolonial studies and Mesoamerican voices, shedding light on the lasting impact of this historical period.

  • Colonial Spanish America
  • Visual Culture
  • Indigenous History
  • Cultural Exchange
  • Ethnic Identities
  • Religious Practices
  • Language Policy
  • Legal Cultures
  • Mesoamerican Voices
  • Postcolonial Studies
Research works
19k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
14.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+2%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Latin American history and culture research?

By volume, the United States and Mexico publish the most (648 and 563 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 648 works
  2. 2 Mexico 563 works
  3. 3 Spain 324 works
  4. 4 Peru 162 works
  5. 5 Chile 157 works
  6. 6 Argentina 127 works
  7. 7 France 109 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 72 works
  9. 9 Colombia 52 works
  10. 10 Canada 45 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 28.7%Mexico: 25.0%Spain: 14.3%Peru: 7.2%6 others listed: 24.9%29%largest
United States648 · 28.7%Mexico563 · 25.0%Spain324 · 14.3%Peru162 · 7.2%6 others listed561 · 24.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Latin American history and culture research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México publishes the most Latin American history and culture research, followed by El Colegio de México and National Institute of Anthropology and History.

Who are the leading researchers in Latin American history and culture?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Latin American history and culture include Alberto Ortíz and Eric R. Wolf.

  1. 1 Alberto Ortíz Spain 5.9k citations
  2. 2 Eric R. Wolf United States 1.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Latin American history and culture research done?

The largest centres of Latin American history and culture research in 2022–2025 are Mexico City (Mexico), Madrid (Spain), Lima (Peru) and Santiago (Chile). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Tlalpan.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Mexico City Mexico 302 works
  2. 2 Madrid Spain 113 works
  3. 3 Lima Peru 104 works
  4. 4 Santiago Chile 85 works
  5. 5 Buenos Aires Argentina 63 works
  6. 6 Tlalpan Mexico 50 works
  7. 7 Paris France 43 works
  8. 8 Chicago United States 30 works
  9. 9 Bogotá Colombia 30 works
  10. 10 Seville Spain 29 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. TlalpanMX · 49.6 works174×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Latin American history and culture than the world average.

See Latin American history and culture on the map

Where is the best place to study Latin American history and culture?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Tarapacá, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.97%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Tarapacá: 13, 26.0%Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins: 10, 15.7%Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 179, 12.7%Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México: 9, 37.2%University of Warsaw: 11, 31.6%Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: 20, 17.8%National University of San Marcos: 43, 21.7%Adolfo Ibáñez University: 10, 18.8%National University of Saint Anthony the Abbot in Cuzco: 12, 10.9%Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla: 21, 17.3%Universidad Autónoma…University of TarapacáUniversidad Bernardo…Universidad Nacional…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of TarapacáChile 65.826.0%86.5×13 +66.0%
2 Universidad Bernardo O'HigginsChile 61.515.7%105.7×10 +212.3%
3 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico 60.512.7%73.4×179 -20.4%
4 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoMexico 59.537.2%23.8×9 -7.6%
5 University of WarsawPoland 59.331.6%8.7×11 +86.7%
6 Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileChile 57.317.8%24.7×20 +43.2%
7 National University of San MarcosPeru 55.621.7%68.3×43 -35.4%
8 Adolfo Ibáñez UniversityChile 54.818.8%70.6×10 +58.2%
9 National University of Saint Anthony the Abbot in CuzcoPeru 54.510.9%170.3×12 +375.2%
10 Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaMexico 53.217.3%50.5×21 +56.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Latin American history and culture research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2019. The fastest-growing topics are Latin American history and culture.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.