Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Most cited papers from RELX Group (United Kingdom)

What are the most cited papers from RELX Group (United Kingdom)?

The most cited paper from RELX Group (United Kingdom) is "Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers" (Adrian N. Mulligan, Louise Hall, Ellen S. Raphael, 2012), with 406 citations. Next come "Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature" (385) and "TiPS receptor and ion channel nomenclature supplement 1994" (201).

Showing 50 of 59 papers. Every paper with more than 11 citations is listed.

Most cited papers, sortable by citations and release date
#Paper
1 Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers Adrian N. Mulligan, Louise Hall, Ellen S. Raphael · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 4 Dec 2012 406
2 Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature Iain Craig, Andrew Plume, Marie McVeigh et al. · Journal of Informetrics 22 Jun 2007 385
3 TiPS receptor and ion channel nomenclature supplement 1994 Steve P. Watson, Debbie Girdlestone · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 1994 201
4 Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? Karen A. Robinson, Klara Brunnhuber, Donna K. Ciliska et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Open access 23 Sep 2020 149
5 Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications Joan Starr et al. · PeerJ Computer Science Open access 27 May 2015 139
6 The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: Implementation and checklist development Heather Van Epps, Olaya Astudillo, Yaiza del Pozo Martín et al. · European Science Editing Open access 5 Oct 2022 123
7 The frontal lobes: Uncharted provinces of the brain Patricia S. Goldman‐Rakic · Trends in Neurosciences Review Nov 1984 120
8 Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures Thomas Jones, Sarah Huggett, Judith Kamalski · World Neurosurgery Jul 2011 111
9 Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value Hans Lund, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Birgitte Nørgaard et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Open access 26 Sep 2020 103
10 Digital Libraries: A Generic Classification and Evaluation Scheme Norbert Fuhr, Preben Hansen, Michael A. Mabe et al. · Lecture notes in computer science Conference paper 2001 103
11 Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author‐reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing Michael A. Mabe, Mayur Amin · Aslib Journal of Information Management Jun 2002 98
12 Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation Richard B. Primack, Elizabeth R. Ellwood, Abraham J. Miller‐Rushing et al. · Biological Conservation 13 Jul 2009 88
13 Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way Henk F. Moed, Lisa Colledge, Jan Reedijk et al. · Scientometrics 24 Mar 2012 82
14 Industrial contributions to desertification in South America Christopher John Schofield, Enrique H. Bucher · Trends in Ecology & Evolution Sep 1986 62
15 Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion Hans Lund, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Birgitte Nørgaard et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Open access 23 Sep 2020 59
16 Personalised Reranking of Paper Recommendations Using Paper Content and User Behavior Xinyi Li, Yifan Chen, Benjamin Pettit et al. · ACM Transactions on Information Systems 16 Mar 2019 58
17 Authors' Submission Toolkit: A practical guide to getting your research published Leighton Chipperfield, Leslie Citrome, Juli Clark et al. · Current Medical Research and Opinion Open access 23 Jun 2010 57
18 A brief guide to polymer nomenclature (IUPAC Technical Report) Roger C. Hiorns, Ray Boucher, Rumen Duhlev et al. · Pure and Applied Chemistry Open access 3 Oct 2012 57
19 The effect of the internet on researcher motivations, behaviour and attitudes Adrian N. Mulligan, Michael A. Mabe · Journal of Documentation 26 Feb 2011 57
20 Ontology mapping for semantically enabled applications Ian Harrow, Rama Balakrishnan, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz et al. · Drug Discovery Today Open access 31 May 2019 54
21 The 17th International Congress on Infectious Diseases workshop on developing infection prevention and control resources for low- and middle-income countries Sangeeta Sastry, Nadia Masroor, Gonzalo M. Bearman et al. · International Journal of Infectious Diseases Open access 16 Feb 2017 48
22 Happy 5th birthday Current Opinion in Pharmacology! Norman George Bowery, E HEADLEY, Robert R. Ruffolo Jr. · Current Opinion in Pharmacology 28 Dec 2005 46
23 Automatic identification of relevant chemical compounds from patents Saber A. Akhondi, Hinnerk Rey, Markus Schwörer et al. · Database Open access 2019 43
24 What Journal Authors Want: Ten Years of Results from Elsevier's Author Feedback Programme Michael A. Mabe, Adrian N. Mulligan · New Review of Information Networking May 2011 43
25 A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Impact of Galantamine on Anterograde Memory Impairment During Electroconvulsive Therapy John Matthews, Caleb J. Siefert, Mark A. Blais et al. · Journal of Ect 22 Mar 2013 34
26 Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines Mario Malički, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, L.M. Bouter et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 8 Mar 2023 33
27 Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review Hans Lund, Karen A. Robinson, Ane Gjerland et al. · Systematic Reviews ReviewOpen access 15 Nov 2022 31
28 Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis Birgitte Nørgaard, Eva Draborg, Jane Andreasen et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Review 16 Jan 2022 31
29 Down to the origin: Cdc6 protein and the competence to replicate Cristina Pelizon · Trends in Cell Biology Review Mar 2003 30
30 Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies Jane Andreasen, Birgitte Nørgaard, Eva Draborg et al. · PLoS ONE ReviewOpen access 31 Oct 2022 23
31 Scoping reviews MONIKA HARMS, Victoria A Goodwin · Physiotherapy 12 Nov 2019 22
32 Empowering industrial research with shared biomedical vocabularies Lee Harland, Christopher G. C. Larminie, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone et al. · Drug Discovery Today Open access 23 Sep 2011 22
33 Identification of false positives in “HTS hits to lead”: The application of Bayesian models in HTS triage to rapidly deliver a series of selective TRPV4 antagonists Sarah E. Skerratt, James E. J. Mills, Jayesh Mistry · MedChemComm 23 Oct 2012 20
34 Chemical complexity challenge: Is multi‐instance machine learning a solution? Dmitry V. Zankov, Timur Madzhidov, Alexandre A. Varnek et al. · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science Open access 27 Nov 2023 19
35 Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies Eva Draborg, Jane Andreasen, Birgitte Nørgaard et al. · Systematic Reviews ReviewOpen access 5 Sep 2022 19
36 How the Severity Factor in Biomass Hydrolysis Came About Esteban Chornet, Ralph P. Overend Book chapter 2017 19
37 ChemInform Abstract: Layered Metal Phosphates and Their Intercalation Chemistry Abraham Clearfield, Umberto Costantino · ChemInform 1997 19
38 ChemInform Abstract: Shape and Symmetry in the Design of New Hosts Ernst Heinrich Weber · ChemInform 7 Jan 1997 19
39 A New Era of National Guideline Development in Saudi Arabia Ziad Ahmed Memish, Abdulrahman Saad Alqahtani, Nahar Alazemi et al. · Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health Open access 28 Nov 2022 17
40 Something to Believe In J. Honious, Jonathan Clark Conference paper 8 Aug 2006 17
41 Honey I've shrunk biomedical technology! Suzanne Berry · Trends in biotechnology 2002 16
42 Achieving an Equitable Transition to Open Access for Researchers in Lower and Middle-Income Countries [ICSR Perspectives] Andrea Powell, Rob Johnson, Rachel Herbert · SSRN Electronic Journal PreprintOpen access 2020 15
43 ChemInform Abstract: Calixarenes and Related Hosts Andrea Pochini, R. Ungaro · ChemInform 11 Feb 1997 15
44 ChemInform Abstract: Deoxycholic Acid and Related Hosts Mikiji Miyata, Kazunori Sada · ChemInform 7 Jan 1997 15
45 Dragging (and zooming and rotating) publication of 3D molecular structures into the 21st century Jonathan K. Tyzack · Trends in Biochemical Sciences Open access 16 Aug 2008 15
46 A Topic-Based Browser for Large Online Resources Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Anita de Waard, Ravinder Bhogal et al. · Lecture notes in computer science Conference paper 2004 15
47 ChemInform Abstract: Specific Guest Types Éva Fenyvesi, Lajos Szente, N. R. RUSSELL et al. · ChemInform 21 Jan 1997 14
48 Towards Virtual Knowledge Broker services for semantic integration of life science literature and data sources Ian Harrow, Wendy Filsell, Peter M. Woollard et al. · Drug Discovery Today Open access 12 Dec 2012 14
49 ChemInform Abstract: Cation Binding by Calixarenes M. Anthony McKervey, Marie‐José Schwing‐Weill, A.‐N. EHICS · ChemInform 7 Jan 1997 13
50 Reference models for digital libraries: actors and roles Jose Luis Borbinha, John Kunze, Angela Spinazzè et al. · International Journal on Digital Libraries Aug 2005 13

Citations are OpenAlex's own counts, from its 2026-09-23 snapshot, so the ranking can differ from Google Scholar or Web of Science. A paper is listed for an institution when any of its authors gave it as an affiliation; retracted papers and papers whose citation count cannot be traced to citing works are left out, and a preprint and the article it became are shown once. Release dates are OpenAlex's: where a source gave only a month or a year, that is what is shown. How the lists are chosen.