Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Maastricht · Netherlands

Social Historic Centre for Limburg

In research, Social Historic Centre for Limburg stands highest in Social Sciences (#3,176 of 9,585 worldwide), Social Sciences (#3,128 of 5,988 worldwide) and Arts and Humanities (#1,467 of 1,896 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in History, History and Philosophy of Science and Finance (History is 59.3× its share of world research).

shclimburg.nl/enROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#10,318
of 22,385 · #26,041 all time
Rank in Netherlands
#95
of 197
Research works
350
▲ 6872% vs 2018-21
Citations
234
0.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.9%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.94×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
96%
world 40%
International
1%
world 18%
Social Historic Centre for Limburg

What is Social Historic Centre for Limburg known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #3,176 of 9,585 13.0%293 #7164
Social SciencesField #3,128 of 5,988 17.7%133 #6704
Arts and HumanitiesField #1,467 of 1,896 9.1%103 -
HistorySubfield #183 of 218 13.4%61 -

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Social Historic Centre for Limburg sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Social Historic Centre for Limburg work in?

In 2022-now, 91% of research at Social Historic Centre for Limburg is in Social Sciences, 4% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (41%), Arts and Humanities (32%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (16%). It does 3.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 293 fractional works · 90.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 133 fractional works · 41.3% of its workEducation: 52 fractional works · 16.3% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 31 fractional works · 9.5% of its workDemography: 16 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSociology and Political Science: 13 fractional works · 4.0% of its workPublic Administration: 6 fractional works · 1.8% of its workUrban Studies: 4 fractional works · 1.3% of its workLaw: 4 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAnthropology: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLinguistics and Language: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 103 fractional works · 31.9% of its workHistory: 61 fractional works · 19.0% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 28 fractional works · 8.7% of its workArcheology: 5 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 4 fractional works · 1.2% of its workConservation: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 52 fractional works · 16.1% of its workFinance: 33 fractional works · 10.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 19 fractional works · 6.0% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workStrategy and Management: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 4.0% of its workEnergy: 5 fractional works · 1.6% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 5 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPaleontology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 9 fractional works · 2.9% of its workMedicine: 7 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 4 fractional works · 1.2% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacy: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 7 fractional works · 2.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 6 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFood Science: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKSocial HistoricCentre for…322fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences3%Social Sciences91%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences13341.3%
    2. Arts and Humanities10331.9%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance5216.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting20.6%
    5. Psychology20.6%
    6. Decision Sciences10.3%
    1. Energy51.6%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences20.7%
    3. Environmental Science20.7%
    4. Computer Science20.5%
    5. Engineering10.4%
    1. Medicine72.1%
    2. Health Professions30.8%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences61.9%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.1%
    3. Neuroscience00.1%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Social Historic Centre for Limburg specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: History takes 59.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. HistorySubfield · 61.3 works59×
  2. History and Philosophy of ScienceSubfield · 28.0 works56×
  3. FinanceSubfield · 32.8 works34×
  4. Arts and HumanitiesField · 102.8 works11×
  5. Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField · 52.0 works7.5×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.40× its world share, 6 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.07× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.46× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.75× its world share, 5 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.03× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.15× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.31× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.11× its world share, 7 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 11.06× its world share, 103 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.18× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 7.54× its world share, 52 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.19× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.27× its world share, 133 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 11.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities11.06×103 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance7.54×52 works
  3. Social Sciences3.27×133 works
  4. Energy1.75×5 works
  5. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.46×2 works
  6. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.40×6 works
  7. Decision Sciences0.32×1 works
  8. Health Professions0.31×3 works
  9. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.29×0 works
  10. Psychology0.19×2 works
  11. Business, Management and Accounting0.18×2 works
  12. Environmental Science0.15×2 works
  13. Medicine0.11×7 works
  14. Computer Science0.07×2 works
  15. Neuroscience0.06×0 works
  16. Engineering0.03×1 works
  17. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Social Historic Centre for Limburg?

Ranked on the quality score, T. S. Jansma, W. Jappe Alberts and Joke Mooij lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Social Historic Centre for Limburg.

  1. 1 T. S. Jansma Netherlands · #2,640,800 worldwide 94 citations · 34 works
  2. 2 W. Jappe Alberts Netherlands · #3,205,169 worldwide 8 citations · 24 works
  3. 3 Joke Mooij Netherlands · #3,656,341 worldwide 35 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Peter Van Goethem Netherlands · #3,913,695 worldwide 4 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Willibrord Rutten Netherlands · #4,192,575 worldwide 19 citations · 32 works
  6. 6 Joeri Januarius Netherlands · #4,602,947 worldwide 8 citations · 18 works
  7. 7 J.F.R. Philips Netherlands · #5,003,187 worldwide 7 citations · 24 works
  8. 8 J.C.G.M. Jansen Netherlands · #5,613,153 worldwide 14 citations · 43 works
  9. 9 Remigius Dieteren Netherlands · #5,725,063 worldwide 2 citations · 36 works
  10. 10 Ad Knotter Netherlands · #6,040,486 worldwide 183 citations · 107 works
All ranked researchers at Social Historic Centre for Limburg

What are the most cited papers from Social Historic Centre for Limburg?

The most cited paper from Social Historic Centre for Limburg is "ANALYSING NON-COMPLIANCE IN CLINICAL TRIALS: ETHICAL IMPERATIVE OR MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?" (Els J. T. Goetghebeur, Stanley H. Shapiro, 1996), with 25 citations. Next come "Perspectives on Cross-Border Labor in Europe: “(Un)familiarity” or “Push-and-Pull”?" (18) and "Migration and Ethnicity in Coalfield History: Global Perspectives" (16).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 ANALYSING NON-COMPLIANCE IN CLINICAL TRIALS: ETHICAL IMPERATIVE OR MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? Els J. T. Goetghebeur, Stanley H. Shapiro · Statistics in Medicine 30 Dec 1996 25
2 Perspectives on Cross-Border Labor in Europe: “(Un)familiarity” or “Push-and-Pull”? Ad Knotter · Journal of Borderlands Studies 3 Jul 2014 18
3 Migration and Ethnicity in Coalfield History: Global Perspectives Ad Knotter · International Review of Social History Open access 9 Oct 2015 16
4 Justice for Janitors Goes Dutch. Precarious Labour and Trade Union Response in the Cleaning Industry (1988–2012): A Transnational History Ad Knotter · International Review of Social History Open access 10 Mar 2017 14
5 “Little Moscows” in Western Europe: The Ecology of Small-Place Communism Ad Knotter · International Review of Social History Open access Sep 2011 13
All 73 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Social Historic Centre for Limburg?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Cultural Diversity, Gender, Social Work, Identity, Inclusion, Cultural History and Empowerment.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Education95▲ 17×13 topics
  2. Cultural Diversity46▲ 64×4 topics
  3. Gender46▲ 26×7 topics
  4. Identity45▲ 19×9 topics
  5. Social Work45▲ 212×2 topics
  6. Cultural History45▲ 116×2 topics
  7. Inclusion45▲ 95×2 topics
  8. Empowerment44▲ 140×1 topic
  9. Research Methods44▲ 89×1 topic
  10. Ethnicity44▲ 36×7 topics
  11. Literature44▲ 25×3 topics
  12. Nationalism42▲ 29×5 topics
  13. Colonialism42▲ 27×4 topics
  14. Memory42▲ 53×3 topics
  15. Community41▲ 108×2 topics
  16. Art History41▲ 510×1 topic
  17. Cultural Analysis41▲ 272×2 topics
  18. Financial Crisis36▲ 101×2 topics
  19. Economic Impact34▲ 20×3 topics
  20. Urbanization33▲ 26×2 topics
  21. Global World33▲ 1758×1 topic
  22. Seventeenth Century33▲ 1758×1 topic
  23. Globalization32▲ 5.1×18 topics
  24. European Union31▲ 43×5 topics
  25. Healthcare31▲ 8.3×5 topics
  26. Research28▲ 69×2 topics
  27. Physical Training27▲ 887×1 topic
  28. Statistical Analysis27▲ 49×1 topic
  29. International Relations19▲ 24×3 topics
  30. Diplomacy18▲ 62×2 topics
  31. Urban Development17▲ 15×4 topics
  32. Migration17▲ 15×3 topics
  33. Immigration16▲ 45×4 topics
  34. European Integration16▲ 88×2 topics
  35. Trade16▲ 63×2 topics
  36. Healthcare Systems15▲ 104×2 topics
  37. Integration15▲ 32×1 topic
  38. Policy15▲ 21×1 topic
  39. Health12▲ 9.7×2 topics
  40. Eastern Europe11▲ 64×2 topics

Which research topics does Social Historic Centre for Limburg publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Cultural History and Identity Formation, Financial Crisis of the 21st Century and Sports Science and Education.

Dutch Social and Cultura…44Dutch Social and Cultural Studies: 44 fractional worksCultural History and Identity Formation: 41 fractional worksFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century: 33 fractional worksSports Science and Educa…27Sports Science and Education: 27 fractional worksMigration, Policy, and D…15Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies: 15 fractional worksHistorical Economic and Social Studies: 11 fractional worksHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics: 10 fractional worksHistorical Influence and Diplomacy: 8 fractional worksLabor Movements and Unions: 6 fractional worksCross-Border Cooperation and Integration: 5 fractional works
EducationHistoryFinanceHistory and Philosophy of Science4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 44 works
  2. 2 Cultural History and Identity Formation History 41 works
  3. 3 Financial Crisis of the 21st Century Finance 33 works
  4. 4 Sports Science and Education History and Philosophy of Science 27 works
  5. 5 Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies Demography 15 works
  6. 6 Historical Economic and Social Studies Economics and Econometrics 11 works
  7. 7 Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 10 works
  8. 8 Historical Influence and Diplomacy Political Science and International Relations 8 works
  9. 9 Labor Movements and Unions Public Administration 6 works
  10. 10 Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration Political Science and International Relations 5 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available95.5%not open4.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors0.6%domestic only99.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Social Historic Centre for Limburg's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 6872% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Social Historic Centre for Limburg as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0056% in 2023.

still counting0.0020%0.0040%0.0060%Social Historic Centre for Limburg0.0000015% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Social Historic Centre for Limburg over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Maastricht

All research institutions in Maastricht

Share Social Historic Centre for Limburg's ranking

Social Historic Centre for Limburg on Science Explorer

A card with Social Historic Centre for Limburg's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Social Historic Centre for Limburg. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.